<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for fostert</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/fostert/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/fostert/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2019 13:51:41 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The Trump Doctrine: Bash Our Friends, Cozy Up to Our Enemies</title><link>http://www.motherjones.com/node/762607#comment-4518503011</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Booker used it as a clever tactic to get more time. He didn't really criticize the deal.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fostert</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2019 13:51:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: There’s a Disturbing Reason Europe Has Stayed So Peaceful For So Long</title><link>http://www.motherjones.com/node/620004#comment-3988853604</link><description>&lt;p&gt;And yet, it still does not say what it is. I assume it's some theoretical cultural boundaries from the early 20th century. It isn't political boundaries from any time. Or even linguistic boundaries. I'd love to know the source.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fostert</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2018 17:06:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Raw Data: Kids and Their Cars</title><link>http://www.motherjones.com/node/603042#comment-3897788913</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This strikes me as one of those things that should be true, but apparently isn't. Uber alone should greatly reduce car ownership, especially among millennials who are more likely to embrace new concepts. Add in the declining status of car ownership, better public transportation, and a stronger desire for fitness, car ownership really should be dropping noticeably. I guess we just still love our cars.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fostert</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2018 14:30:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are Today’s Young Men Slackers and Chumps?</title><link>http://www.motherjones.com/node/600096#comment-3884256935</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The decline in median income for young men is hardly their fault. It's that the old men aren't paying them what they are worth.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fostert</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2018 11:07:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Raw Data: Southwest Border Apprehensions</title><link>http://www.motherjones.com/node/590724#comment-3834459508</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'd like to see a comparison chart that shows people caught using shipping containers to get in. They might be going up. Unless ICE isn't trying.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fostert</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2018 13:44:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Here’s a Textbook Criticism of Econometrics Gone Bad</title><link>http://www.motherjones.com/node/587087#comment-3818797650</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Just wondering. Did the original study publish correlation coefficients? That's usually the quickest way to determine if you should ignore a study.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fostert</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2018 11:19:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Let’s Please Calm Down For a Few Days Over the Uber Car Crash</title><link>http://www.motherjones.com/node/586742#comment-3817464739</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That was my first thought. Elevator lawsuits are fairly common, so there is plenty of legal precedent.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fostert</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2018 14:31:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Did No One Notice Yosemite’s Horsetail “Firefall Effect” Before 1973?</title><link>http://www.motherjones.com/node/584266#comment-3796937546</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I remember seeing a print of this in a gallery and wondering why Adams didn't have a color version of it. Yes, Ansel Adams did dabble in color photography. The more interesting question is why his notes never mentioned it. Then again, a lot of his notes are lost, so maybe he did mention it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fostert</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2018 19:16:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Did No One Notice Yosemite’s Horsetail “Firefall Effect” Before 1973?</title><link>http://www.motherjones.com/node/584266#comment-3796861007</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Look at the Ansel Adams shot, he certainly took it when the setting sun was catching the waterfall. The photograph is black and white, so we cannot say what color the waterfall was, but Adams caught that same light.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fostert</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2018 18:01:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clean, Endless Fusion Power Now Only 15 Years Away. Maybe.</title><link>http://www.motherjones.com/node/584049#comment-3795297860</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I remember the thirty years or so when HDTV was only ten years away. Guess what? It did come, and it's on you phone now. I'll remain skeptical, but I don't think we are waiting for Gedot.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fostert</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2018 15:21:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Holocaust Museum Revokes Award to Aung San Suu Kyi</title><link>http://www.motherjones.com/node/584021#comment-3795252368</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Actually being persecuted makes it more likely that you will persecute others when you get power.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fostert</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2018 14:50:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Donald Trump Finally Makes His Stupid Tariff Announcement</title><link>http://www.motherjones.com/node/583889#comment-3793951389</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, the good news is that Canada and Mexico are exempted. This means we can buy all the foreign steel we need through them without tariffs. It won't help the US steel industry at all because there is a loophole big enough to pilot a container ship through. I don't mind, the steel workers backed Trump and deserve to get burned for it. As long as I can get the steel I need from Mexico and Canada, I don't care, and neither does anyone else who makes things out of steel.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fostert</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2018 18:21:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Republican Party Finance Chairman Accused of “Decades-Long Pattern of Sexual Misconduct”</title><link>http://www.motherjones.com/node/571817#comment-3727944841</link><description>&lt;p&gt;He's the perfect guy for finance chairman. The Republicans certainly need someone with experience at paying off women.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fostert</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2018 14:40:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: In the Era of Trump, Everybody Hates Us</title><link>http://www.motherjones.com/node/546848#comment-3713676218</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What happened in 2011?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fostert</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2018 01:34:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Conservatives Are Sick and Tired of…Something or Other</title><link>http://www.motherjones.com/node/546748#comment-3713365113</link><description>&lt;p&gt;These Republicans investigated Clinton's adultery for years and now suddenly think it's acceptable behavior. Hell, they impeached Clinton over adultery.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fostert</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2018 19:50:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Split Up All the Big States? Why Not Just Reform the Senate Instead?</title><link>http://www.motherjones.com/node/546534#comment-3712898518</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The last time a state split, it took an issue as monumental as slavery. Maine split from Massachusetts under the Missouri Compromise.  I just don't see an issue that is as important today. Maybe abortion, but the Republicans can already ban it at the federal level and it might survive the Supreme Court. It would definitely survive the Supreme Court if they assassinated Justice Kennedy and rammed through a new justice before they lose the Senate. They don't need another state when they can overrule all of them.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fostert</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2018 14:35:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: California Is Doing Fine, Thank You Very Much</title><link>http://www.motherjones.com/node/545970#comment-3708108581</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In fairness, his house in Austin is old and near downtown. You want old in Texas because the trees are tall enough to provide shade. He probably paid an extra $150k for shade. But if you ever lived through a Texas summer, you appreciate the value of shade and will pay for it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fostert</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2018 18:02:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: California Is Doing Fine, Thank You Very Much</title><link>http://www.motherjones.com/node/545970#comment-3708101129</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Both three bedroom houses with almost no yard. Same two parents, same two kids. About 1300 sq ft. So yeah, now a little under $1 million in Austin.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fostert</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2018 17:55:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: California Is Doing Fine, Thank You Very Much</title><link>http://www.motherjones.com/node/545970#comment-3707950876</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As for housing prices, I have a friend who moved from Berkeley, CA to Austin, TX several years ago, and his housing costs went up by 30%. And given that Texas has no income tax and relies on property taxes, his overall taxes (property + income) actually went up too. He's even more financially squeezed in Texas than he was in California.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fostert</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2018 16:02:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: California Is Doing Fine, Thank You Very Much</title><link>http://www.motherjones.com/node/545970#comment-3707939790</link><description>&lt;p&gt;At least they gave up on beating up Massachusetts. We rank 26th in median tax rates, so the "Taxachuesstes" thing really doesn't fly. Want to challenge us on crime or education? Ha! How about teen pregnancy? Sorry. They need someone  new to beat up, and Minnesota surely won't work. Damn you liberals! You keep running states better than we can!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fostert</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2018 15:55:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: America Needs a Troglodyte/Eat-the-Rich Party</title><link>http://www.motherjones.com/node/544542#comment-3698410977</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In fairness, some flavor comes from salt and sugar. But yeah, if you're not sure, you should probably add more butter.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fostert</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2018 19:22:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: America Needs a Troglodyte/Eat-the-Rich Party</title><link>http://www.motherjones.com/node/544542#comment-3698362029</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Look at Maine. The only thing a third party does is guarantee that the Republicans win. They hate LePage, but elected him. Twice. Both times with a minority of the vote. The most right wing candidate that can get 34% of the vote wins a three way race every time. And the liberals always fall for it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fostert</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2018 18:43:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NATO Defense Spending Started Increasing Three Years Ago</title><link>http://www.motherjones.com/node/543298#comment-3688664324</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Obama doesn't really deserve the credit. Much of the increase is Scandinavian countries that genuinely fear a Russian invasion. Who's next after Ukraine? Those are the countries that are really boosting their defense spending.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fostert</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 15:43:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What’s Really Causing the Decline in US Life Expectancy? It’s Not Opioid Overdoses.</title><link>http://www.motherjones.com/node/542959#comment-3683420581</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There has been a dramatic increase in death during childbirth. Those are often two deaths, and one of them is very young.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fostert</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2017 14:03:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pentagon Ignores Trump, Will Allow Transgender Enlistments</title><link>http://www.motherjones.com/node/538162#comment-3657424183</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It appears to be an order by a federal judge.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fostert</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2017 13:44:53 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>