<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for floydbogart</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-3027f828" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/floydbogart/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 06:38:58 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: We just attacked Syria</title><link>http://www.americablog.com/2008/10/we-just-attacked-syria.html#comment-3320852</link><description>Is this really a surprise to anybody?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">floydbogart</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 06:38:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: McCain crowd boos mention of Tina Fey while Palin gets to do a comedy show on NBC when she won't do a news show on NBC</title><link>http://www.americablog.com/2008/10/mccain-crowd-boos-mention-of-tina-fey.html#comment-3159588</link><description>I'd have to say that was the weakest SNL politically in a while.  They obviously toned things down to make Palin comfortable.  So what was the point?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">floydbogart</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 18:53:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Obama: Did Freddie and Fannie buy access to John McCain via campaign manager Rick Davis?</title><link>http://www.americablog.com/2008/09/obama-did-freddie-and-fannie-buy-access.html#comment-2573033</link><description>Of course they did!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Any other interpretation is nothing but spin.&lt;br&gt;The GOP has treated us all as fools for years.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is this a surprise to anyone?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">floydbogart</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 18:18:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sarah Palin still refusing to give interviews to the media</title><link>http://www.americablog.com/2008/09/sarah-palin-still-refusing-to-give.html#comment-2528152</link><description>And with John McCain showing signs that his age is catching up with his cognitive abilities, this is a real concern.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Not only should Gov. Palin submit to the normal level of press scrutiny, but Senator McCain should disclose his medical records in an open way.  Not the "3 Hour" perusal by a select few journalists that he has allowed so far.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Floyd&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://floydbogart.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://floydbogart.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;What I see here is a man that wants to be President so badly that he will do and say virtually anything to get there.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">floydbogart</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 01:37:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ShareMe -The Mobile Future : Weblog</title><link>http://www.jroller.com/shareme/entry/deelting_seos_on_twitter#comment-399955</link><description>Thanks for the link!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;FB&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://squidoo.com/freelenstraffic" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://squidoo.com/freelenstraffic&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">floydbogart</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 00:33:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who said Twitter couldn&amp;#8217;t be spammed?</title><link>http://www.technovia.co.uk/2008/04/who-said-twitter-couldnt-be-spammed.html#comment-324789</link><description>Which would be a valid point except that I &lt;i&gt;do&lt;/i&gt; interact with those people that I have "Mass Friended" and I &lt;i&gt;do&lt;/i&gt; visit their sites and respond to their comments.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The fact that I wish to be exposed to a &lt;i&gt;larger&lt;/i&gt; Twitter community within a niche doesn't make my view or use of Twitter less valuable than yours.  I can and do choose not to follow individuals, and many can and do choose to limit their Twitter experience by making their posts private.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is all just MHO of course, and you are free to yours as well.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I just don't see how you are adversely affected unless you choose to be....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This will be my last post on the matter.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Floyd Bogart&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://floydbogart.com/FreeLensTraffic.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;The Offending Lens&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">floydbogart</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 14:49:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who said Twitter couldn&amp;#8217;t be spammed?</title><link>http://www.technovia.co.uk/2008/04/who-said-twitter-couldnt-be-spammed.html#comment-324575</link><description>Can't see how this can be qualified as Spamming anything, as every single person that gets my updates has "Opted-In" by clicking that they choose to "Follow" me.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Likewise, they may "Opt-Out" at any time with a click of the "Remove" button.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is the simple action that I have taken anytime I have found the content of another Twitterer objectionable in any way.  I would agree that I was spamming if every Twitter member had no choice but to either be exposed to my posts, or leave the service, as would be the case in a forum.  Here I gotta say that I disagree.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Floyd Bogart&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://floydbogart.com/blog.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Floyd's Blog&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">floydbogart</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 14:11:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who said Twitter couldn&amp;#8217;t be spammed?</title><link>http://www.technovia.co.uk/2008/04/who-said-twitter-couldnt-be-spammed.html#comment-322909</link><description>An interesting perspective, but frankly (as the Wanker that wrote the lens) I've gotten a lot of positive feedback from my Twitter buddies on each of my profiles saying that they appreciated my Twits!  Those that feel they don't like the nature of my "Twits" can and do opt to stop following me, but that really happens quite infrequently...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Can't even say though that I was the one that came up with this.  It is often called "MicroBlogging" and one version or another of this method is taught in quite a few YouTube vids.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But thanks for the PR for my lens, as it's gotten me quite a few hits, and several clickouts as well.  You know what they say:  "There's no such thing as bad publicity!"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Floyd Bogart&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;a href="http://floydbogart.com/blog.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Floyd's Social Marketing Blog&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">floydbogart</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 01:00:07 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>