<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Keilaron</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/fefba7bc53af8b66f3062969c85c6856/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 01:34:12 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Top 20 Reasons why Web Apps are Superior to Desktop Apps</title><link>http://vinnylingham.disqus.com/top_20_reasons_why_web_apps_are_superior_to_desktop_apps/#comment-1608886</link><description>"Never installed"&lt;br&gt;No, instead, it's always downloaded. Forget gigabit - with enough users you'd need terabit... internet connections.&lt;br&gt;Not networks.&lt;br&gt;Unless the company's the one hosting the web app, that is.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Updates are seamless"&lt;br&gt;I'll give you that one; "Clear your browser cache" "Huh?" is the only problem I see. However, there's still the ability to use regular thin clients, e.g. Citrix.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"No legacy"&lt;br&gt;What? Aren't there people still clinging to that evil NS4, or to IE6, or to Lynx?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"No admin rights required"&lt;br&gt;Assuming /everything/ you want is on the web, yes. Also, RDP/VNC, Citrix, etc....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Available anywhere, anytime"&lt;br&gt;Yay, another Adobe product... am I the only one that sees a problem with that?&lt;br&gt;Anyway, true so long as the company's not the one hosting the web apps, otherwise it's up to the company whether or not it's available anywhere.&lt;br&gt;Also, let's not forget that this can be done with desktop apps anyway (RDP/VNC, Citrix, etc.).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Platform independent"&lt;br&gt;N/A. It just turns from "This OS isn't supported" into "This browser isn't supported".&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Less environmental conflicts"&lt;br&gt;See above, though granted there will still be less.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Enables social possibilities"&lt;br&gt;N/A. You can have desktop chat/collab apps as much as you can have web ones, .. just like you can have NO web ones.&lt;br&gt;Collab files? Network files, collab apps, etc..&lt;br&gt;Just not applicable.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Lower cost of sale"&lt;br&gt;I have to give you that one too.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Usable from inexpensive PCs"&lt;br&gt;Thin client? What are you talking about?&lt;br&gt;Often enough you have to load a fair amount of resources and have to process all those fancy effects - they are a LOT more taxing when emulated from a browser rather than done natively.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Piracy-proof"&lt;br&gt;Piracy often occurs from the inside, i.e. leaks, and therefore this is incorrect. The only way this wouldn't apply is if everything were to be open-source (Yeah, right - like they'd be that brave!).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"No bad debts"&lt;br&gt;Conversely, if your web app provider goes bust and you had to use their servers, there go your apps.&lt;br&gt;Possibly your files too.&lt;br&gt;"Say, did anyone export that document I spent a few weeks on...?"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Low-cost support and maintenance"&lt;br&gt;Instead, you're just saying, "We did a boo-boo exporting our code from the test server to the production server. Come back tomorrow. Have a day off or something."&lt;br&gt;Well, 'day' is a stretch, but you get the idea. Everyone using that web app goes down when that happens, not just one person, or one group/team, or (maybe) one company.&lt;br&gt;This makes potential faults and other issues become a SEVERE cost.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"User's data is kept safe in hosting environment"&lt;br&gt;Pseudo-safe. Viruses will adapt to web apps too, likely.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"No Viruses"&lt;br&gt;As long as there's something executing, there's a possibility of infection. It may be harder, but it's still there.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Low cost global distribution"&lt;br&gt;Yeah. All you have to worry about is latency (Again, if not hosted by the company).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Lower software price entry point for customers"&lt;br&gt;This was possible beforehand; The ideals that people are having about the Web, however, is forcing companies to realise that sharing with the end-users is a good thing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Access to the entire assets of the Web (APIs, widgets, messaging, collaboration)"&lt;br&gt;...? Do you think these things are exclusive to the web somehow? They quite simply aren't.&lt;br&gt;Unless, of course, you've forgotten that the Web is part of the Internet (for one).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Mobile is here"&lt;br&gt;Depending on your resolution, yes.&lt;br&gt;Don't try Gmail on your cell phone! (Although they probably have a special interface for those, the point is that no, you still have to make changes.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Widest potential audience"&lt;br&gt;Given, but it seems to me you've already mentioned that with 'channels'.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Keilaron</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 19:08:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top 20 Reasons why Web Apps are Superior to Desktop Apps</title><link>http://vinnylingham.disqus.com/top_20_reasons_why_web_apps_are_superior_to_desktop_apps/#comment-1608888</link><description>Neither. The only reason desktop apps have those in the first place is because PEOPLE LOVE THEM.&lt;br&gt;So, web or not, that one gets scratched.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Keilaron</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 01:34:12 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>