Disqus - Latest Comments for Jack Humphrey

Re: 2009 Business Plan for an authority blog

Jack Humphrey — Sat, 03 Jan 2009 22:09:32 -0000

Thanks for the mention and good luck on your plan!

Re: Review of Social Power Linking

Jack Humphrey — Sat, 19 Jan 2008 12:45:43 -0000

Hey thanks Hector! You know how to get my attention!

Thanks for the great review and congrats on that speedy pickup by Google!

Re: Speed Linking Slow Linking

Jack Humphrey — Wed, 17 Jan 2007 03:40:14 -0000

Thanks Andy - you can clarify for me anytime!

I like your linking policy too. People who use "no follow" or worse, turn off their trackbacks and comments, are giving in to the biggest failed effort in history to stop comment spam.

If people only realized how they are killing their own business by turning off user interaction with their sites, they'd stop doing it in a second!

ASKIMET kills all my comment spam - no idea why people are so worked up over it!

Re: Speed Linking Slow Linking

Jack Humphrey — Wed, 17 Jan 2007 03:40:14 -0000

Re: Social Power Linking Review

Jack Humphrey — Wed, 22 Aug 2007 12:52:25 -0000

Andy,

You are beating me in Google for my own product man! Good Job!

I will try to figure out a digital delivery for this. I understand your hesitation and frankly, I hate shipping things for many of the same reasons you don't like ordering "shipables!"

It's just that these files are so huge, I know I'd get a lot of complaints from people on download times and problems too. There's around 27 videos on the disks along with a lot of other stuff, and the audios.

It's a tough call either way but I will talk to my partners about it and try to come up with a solution. Yours isn't the only reservation I have heard on this point thus far.

Thanks for being #1 in Google for "social power linking!"

Jack

Re: Social Power Linking Review

Jack Humphrey — Wed, 22 Aug 2007 12:52:25 -0000

Re: Why Blogs Suck

Jack Humphrey — Wed, 03 Oct 2007 23:10:55 -0000

I have been reading that blogging is already on the decline.

I read a lot. Never read that before. Blogging, like Andy said, is a content management system choice.

If blogging is on the decline it is mots certainly with the people another commentator wrote about who jumped into it looking at it like a biz opp and that it would be easy.

If blogging is on the decline, it is a good decline, like the housing market coming into line. There are still realtors making a killing out there and the housing industry isn't dead. It's just that the easy money people are leaving (bad mortgage brokers for instance) and the market is coming back in line with true demand and value and not the over-hyped, inflated values before the bubble burst.

Never thought blogging and the US housing market could be so closely related, lol.

On a final note - A-list bloggers were not chosen to be such by some governing internet blogging agency. They made themselves.

A successful blog is created with blood, sweat, and Red Bull. If you want to be an A-lister - do it if you have it in you. But never make the mistake that these guys had anything handed to them. That's precisely why they are on the list and you are not.

Re: Why Blogs Suck

Jack Humphrey — Wed, 03 Oct 2007 23:10:55 -0000

I have been reading that blogging is already on the decline.

Re: Why Blogs Suck

Jack Humphrey — Sat, 06 Oct 2007 13:02:50 -0000

Busy thread here - good job Andy. :)

Couple clarifications needed:

1. I mentioned blogging is in decline because people who don't want to take the time to build a quality site, whether its a blog or not, quit. Blogging just happens to be the easiest way to create a website these days and people are glomming on to it by the millions, finding out success takes work, and go back to their day jobs considering what we do a scam - or worse - they blame an inanimate object like the code that runs a site (blog software) for their failure.

Notice how Andy said "blogging sucks." Knowing the value of a good title doesn't mean he truly thinks that the way he publishes online sucks because he'd be gone already. Why wouldn't this be his farewell post if he thought software was to blame?

Would you write differently or interact differently with your market simply because you were using Dreamweaver to publish instead of your blog?

You still have to connect with readers. The information still has to get out there on SOME platform.

2. People making comments about how social sites only have other bloggers on them, so why spend time on social marketing, are missing the point entirely. Being on the social sites gets you into the engines. The traffic you get from the ENGINES is largely outside the social networks where the heavy-duty geeks live. These are people looking for information you have and they have nothing to do with blogging, blogs, or social networks.

Whatever traffic you do skim off the network itself that produces for you, great. But don't discount the fact that your main site plus several of your satellite blogs and profiles from social sites should also be getting into the SERPS and bolstering your link popularity and traffic.

3. I wanted to support Andy's position here, but I think it's important to point out that a lot of comments here are tending toward the gloom and doom side and can be seen as very short sighted when it comes to the power of blogging.

So my position is: Blogging as a traffic generation and sales tool doesn't suck. Blogs are a way of communicating on the web like any other website platform. If you suck at communicating, testing your conversation and driving traffic in a profitable direction from your content, then switching to another publishing platform isn't going to help at all.

Re: Why Blogs Suck

Jack Humphrey — Sat, 06 Oct 2007 13:02:50 -0000

Re: Aweber RSS To Email Scheduling And Feed Counts

Jack Humphrey — Fri, 18 Jan 2008 19:24:57 -0000

I just switched completely over to Feedblitz. I have to still move my AWEBER people over, but I'm tired of waiting for the old school to catch up.

I don't need to personalize every damn email that goes out and I'm not in a niche where anyone is even impressed by that feature, which to me, is the only thing I am giving up.

They should have reported their numbers to Feedburner a long time ago. Too little too late.

My subscriber count went up by 3000 this week. Wonder if that's my AWEBER subs. Think I will leave them there :)

Re: Aweber RSS To Email Scheduling And Feed Counts

Jack Humphrey — Fri, 18 Jan 2008 19:24:57 -0000

Re: SEO Linking Gotchas Even The Pros Make

Jack Humphrey — Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:14:09 -0000

This got my vote for the Semmy Award. Best one hands down! Great job.

Re: Ken Evoy Attacks Blogging & WordPress

Jack Humphrey — Sat, 26 Apr 2008 23:41:19 -0000

After I read the thing I wanted to rip into it with vigor. But Ken defeated me ultimately because there was so damn much spin in that thing to sell SBI it was like watching FOX News.

Just thinking about taking the 20-30 points that were so clearly set up to sell an old school system on the new web and explaining why Ken has completely lost his mind was exhausting.

So I waited for people like you to respond, Andy, and then you were far too diplomatic in your response.

So I'm still waiting for someone with more time than Ken (and who has that kind of time?) to write so much about a topic that you lose interest in life itself by the time you are halfway through.

Re: Ken Evoy Attacks Blogging & WordPress

Jack Humphrey — Sat, 26 Apr 2008 23:41:19 -0000

Re: PageRank Update – Twitter Profiles – Tosh

Jack Humphrey — Thu, 28 May 2009 14:18:38 -0000

Andy,

Very good stuff. The thing about engineers at conferences and pagerank would be funny if I didn't think it was also true.

Re: What Grade Do YOU Give Obama?

Jack Humphrey — Tue, 04 Aug 2009 12:22:28 -0000

A- because he's one of the few in Washington trying to DO something instead of saying no to everything.

Re: These Test Results Are Dense!

Jack Humphrey — Fri, 08 Dec 2006 15:22:01 -0000

Thanks for this Michel. This is a killer tracking tool. I love the heat map feature. Remember when someone was trying to charge massive amounts to generate what Crazy Egg is charging peanuts for?

Always pays to wait. Someone is bound to come up with a product that is better and cheaper after the newness of the technology normalizes.

Re: Five Things You Don’t Know About Me

Jack Humphrey — Tue, 19 Dec 2006 14:36:29 -0000

Everything major Michel has to say about copywriting he has said. Is that a bad thing? No. Human nature doesn't change, so tapping into it via myriad techniques stays basically the same.

Will Michel run out of things to say about copy writing? I hope not. Will he bring new ways to train people the solid, immovable principles of copywriting? I'm sure he will.

Can he do something fun, off topic with his own blog? You bet.

Talking about the same thing all the time (I know first hand) gets really old sometimes and you need a break.

All we as educators do is come up with new ways to explain and train about things that never change, along with keeping up with our industry and reporting on new trends.

If it weren't for the new trends, there'd be precious little new things anyone would have to talk about in their professional on a daily basis.

Also - you have to market your site. This is a great Power Linking tactic Michel is taking part in, and, counter to Adam's reaction lots of people like getting to know a bit about the people who's blogs they read everyday.

About Michel having said everything about copywriting: If you took just 10% of his best material on this bog and in his membership site and applied it you'd be doing very well right now.

I have, so I know I don't need to hear about copywriting in every single post he makes.

He's a great guy and we all had bad hair in the 80's.

I am off to my blog to confess (but not brave enough to put pics of my parachute pants up from '84.)

Thanks for the break Michel and Happy Holidays to you and Sylvie!

Jack Humphrey

Re: Five Things You Don’t Know About Me

Jack Humphrey — Tue, 19 Dec 2006 15:25:04 -0000

I would hate this blog if all Michel did was come up with content to sell products, which is every magazine's #1 goal whether the products are good, bad, needed, or wanted.

That is what the blogosphere is defiantly opposed to and so few marketers actually understand.

Sure Michel could come up with a ton of content every single day without repeating himself exactly. They have spam bots that do this. You can churn out 5 pieces of content and have the bot mix it up 100 different ways so nothing is technically the same - except the message.

I lose readers all the time - and customers - because I have chosed to focus on things they aren't interested in and I don't always talk about what they want.

This happens to every blogger in the world.

Chosing to leave Michel's 'sphere over something like this is a detriment only to you. Michel will be quite fine and doesn't need saving.

Re: The Key To Getting The Fees You Deserve

Jack Humphrey — Tue, 20 Nov 2007 01:49:14 -0000

Awesome post Michel.

I think some people assume many copywriters and consultants charge less because they are trying to undersell and compete. When in reality I think many of them don't know the market, the value of their service, and are scared to charge too much based on what they THINK the customer THINKS would be too much.

Re: Give Your Joint-Venture Offer An Extra Punch

Jack Humphrey — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:30:42 -0000

Michel,

Awesome post man. Now that you've done the heavy lifting, I have a place to point FTR readers for this info.

Here's another thing you can do to get their attention: Send them traffic! If they have a blog, submit some of their posts with StumbleUpon, Digg, etc. and get them ready to hear from you.

You will be able to tell when they've registered the extra traffic and where it came from because they are likely to come check out YOUR blog and even comment. Great time to contact them and ask how they liked the extra traffic.

We do that to get JVs and it works like gangbusters. We use our product on their sites and then tell them what we did. Once they "feel" it in action, they're hooked. Never had anyone turn us down after that.

Re: How I Grow My Blog Organically Using These 5 Tips

Jack Humphrey — Tue, 28 Apr 2009 12:39:20 -0000

Excellent post man! This post should be responsible for millions of new visitors for all of your readers in the next month. All they have to do is implement!

Re: To Up Sales, Up Words!

Jack Humphrey — Tue, 05 May 2009 00:56:56 -0000

You shouldn't need advice this important after learning it once before, but I sure did need to read this post! I've strayed away from this important rule lately - badly. Thanks Michel for bringing me back to the light! :)

Re: Purging My Way to Freedom From Email Clutter

Jack Humphrey — Mon, 25 May 2009 17:23:07 -0000

Yep - TalkBiz is probably the only newsletter still 99% about giving good content. One I'd never leave.

Re: How to Convert Articles Into Videos

Jack Humphrey — Thu, 05 Mar 2009 19:58:14 -0000

Robert,

I take back everything I ever said about you. I have to take back everything because it was all bad. This rocks. And it totally makes up for all the stuff you said to me in Warriors years ago. :)

Really - this rocks!

Re: Kicking the Big Butts of Life Motivational Speech Video

Jack Humphrey — Mon, 11 Feb 2008 14:31:45 -0000

Rick,

Just posted this to my new community site:
http://socialauthority.ning.com

You are the original lolcat!

Re: Projectile Product Launch only different

Jack Humphrey — Fri, 07 Mar 2008 09:26:22 -0000

Figures Dean would be the first one to hump this post!

Jack Humphrey's last blog post..Al Kirke joined the group Viral Video Marketers

Re: Jack Humphrey and Building a True Authority Site

Jack Humphrey — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:16:42 -0000

Rick,

Great post! And I am not saying that just because I'm in it either. Someday being genuine will be worth a lot of money. It's an investment, but the dividends do pay.

Jack Humphrey's last blog post..Microblogging Webinar Available: Twitter Traffic!

Re: Link Bait 74 Resources for Getting Links

Jack Humphrey — Fri, 23 May 2008 15:49:15 -0000

Rick,

Did you download the 60 day plan 2.0? You might have the older version. The newest version is more kick buttery anyway.

Jack Humphreys last blog post..Michael Lofton left a comment for Alan Cheng

Re: Unsubscribe From Whomever Emailed You Stompernet

Jack Humphrey — Tue, 27 May 2008 12:57:56 -0000

re: Michael Campbell,

The panic button and adrenaline thing...wow! That single idea is the best way to sum up the whole thing in a nutshell.

re: News and overload

I watch Comedy Central's Daily Show and Steven Colbert more than CNN. Why? Because the news is so damn depressing I'd rather have someone give me the headlines with a laugh than watch straight news with no chaser.

Rick is my Colbert. You get the "news" but with inspired commentary rather than regurgitated, recommended affiliate information.

I am taking all the credit for it too. Simply because Rick asked what I thought before he "launched" this blog and I agreed, which, I am positive, is the whole reason this blog is here today. :)

Re: Unsubscribe From Whomever Emailed You Stompernet

Jack Humphrey — Wed, 28 May 2008 19:32:18 -0000

Sorry - didn't mean to say the Black Book is where the idea for SMARTS came from. Had that been the case it would have been much better.

There were a lot of "hackers" in the program.

Re: Unsubscribe From Whomever Emailed You Stompernet

Jack Humphrey — Thu, 29 May 2008 00:06:53 -0000

"I haven't bought your program, but I doubt that it includes as much in-depth instruction as SMARTS."

You can doubt all you want. You haven't been inside. You DON'T know what you're talking about and I'm beginning to see that you don't know me at all.

"If you think it's about linking, you're way off the mark."

Good - you read the word linking and figure the training is about link building. I guess I need a big damn Emmy-winning video for you to understand anything about this topic.

"If you think it's all "stolen" from you, you're delusional."

Delusional is the man who thinks a great portion of the material a lot of gurus put out is original. They rip off ideas from all over the damn place.

I wouldn't have cared about SMARTS at all if it weren't POSITIONED as the first best finest damn social marketing training ever. They positioned it that way. They have to eat those words unless they expect all of us doing this long before them to just sit back and put up with all this "Almighty Savior" shit.

I'd have let it ride if it were positioned in any of 1000 different ways than the way it was. No, I'm sure nothing was "stolen" in the strictest sense. We all learn things and apply them and even make them into training sometimes.

Everyone is talking about stuff me and a few others were talking about when few people would listen (because they were doing all the Adsense crap trying to figure out why they weren't making anymore money).

Find me out there, ANYWHERE, claiming I invented social marketing. You won't. I'm not the guy you so desperately want to paint with that brush.

This is the only place I brought this up because I was tired of all the chest beating bullshit about something everyone was led to believe WAS invented by SMARTS people.

I didn't invent it, but neither the hell did they. Watch the videos again and see for yourself how they positioned all of it.

I don't have any more time for the this history lesson than a lauded Stomper Faculty Member should, so I'll sign off this one. My words here don't mean squat compared to my track record the last 10 years. (Google me before you reply to this or you'll keep embarrassing yourself.)

If you want to win this debate you're up against 10 years of impeccable credentials. I heard yours are pretty fine, or at least they were until I saw you getting into this mess.

Just remember, none of these people are pissed at ME. You won't find a single spec anywhere on the web containing the kind of venom spewing on this page about my products, services or reputation.

I've had 10 years to destroy my reputation and haven't managed to do it yet. Stomper is in danger of accomplishing the task in virtually no time at all.

I'm not the one on public trial here. Think about that before you tighten the noose even more by trying to act like somehow everyone else is a pile of scroungy infidels and that your position here is the solid one.

Re: Unsubscribe From Whomever Emailed You Stompernet

Jack Humphrey — Thu, 29 May 2008 02:12:29 -0000

Fair enough everyone. I need disclaimers or at least to read my stuff more than twice.

I can see where the only thing anyone got out of my original was that I was some egotistical dumbass claiming first dibs on social marketing.

Wasn't my intent and everyone who really knows me knows I'm not that guy at all.

I honestly don't care anymore and can't remember the last time I let myself get baited like this.

All I was really replying to was one sentence in Dan's reply and on it went.

I feel better now. Not that I felt that bad before considering I have my own very loving, devoted posse and quite the perfect life. Only diff here is like Ed said, the big multi million dollar launch.

If we could all agree that the millions of dollars are the MAIN reason for doing any of it, then I'd be happy.

Believe it or not, I honestly like what I do and helping people enough that I choose not to make $18 million in one day at the expense of others.

You see, I can easily round up the same list of characters and do it too. One thing the gurus can't resist is a hot, pure commodity to profit from, and baby, I got game! There were talks very recently about turning me into the next Internet Idol with people you all know and "love."

Not gonna happen. I opted out of the mega-million dollar day. It doesn't matter to me if people don't believe that.

People who know me know I'm not crazy. So search for the real reason I wouldn't do it and you have ANOTHER way of looking at internet marketing instead of what is now almost considered the ONLY way judging by all the launches.

Hell we all knew more were coming. Walker put out a killer course and now we can count on way more than just Stomper doing it.

And there WERE big launches well before Walker spilled the beans. And conversations just like this one.

10 years of this same exact argument and I still haven't learned to keep my mouth shut and just cash the damn checks.

Re: Unsubscribe From Whomever Emailed You Stompernet

Jack Humphrey — Thu, 29 May 2008 02:18:14 -0000

Anyway Rick - great job on the linkbait dude!

If I wasn't so embarrassed I got sucked into one of the oldest tricks in the book I'd link to you too! :)

Re: Rick Butts Electrocted By Internet Gets Bizarre Powers

Jack Humphrey — Sat, 31 May 2008 13:01:46 -0000

Rick,

How many licks DOES it take to get to the center of a tootsie pop?

Answer that and I will believe you! :)

Re: 12 Biggest Whores in Internet Marketing

Jack Humphrey — Mon, 14 Jul 2008 21:54:41 -0000

Rick,

I really wish you wouldn't have put ME in the center of your next hurricane!

For the record, until this post anyway, me and John are buds. My link for this comment points to one of my TS2 posts on Friday Traffic Report.

I think what people need to do to weigh this launch is 2 things:

1. Look at John's track record and the respect he commands around the web and the material included in this version of Traffic Secrets and decide for themselves, as John wants you to, if the course is right for them and their experience level.

2. Decide which "whore" is going to get your money for buying if you decide to buy. This is accomplished, I believe, by going through the affiliate link you think deserves the credit. I am almost positive John is using "last cookie" which means the last person to send you gets the credit.

Big launches and the value of John's product are two different things and should be considered separately in my opinion.

I might have one myself one day! :)

Re: 12 Biggest Whores in Internet Marketing

Jack Humphrey — Tue, 15 Jul 2008 07:23:23 -0000

I have a new bonus for Traffic Secrets: no bonus!

Bonuses just get you on another list, so I'm making sure to stick with John's idea of a clean, no backend, no upsell, launch and upping the ante with no BONUS promotion. :)

I am off to start a Warrior thread entitled "Who has the worst bonus for TS?"

I'm sure it will be picked up in the engines and thousands will be clicking through, lol.

Re: I Am Joe’s Email List – An Open Letter To Internet Marketers

Jack Humphrey — Wed, 16 Jul 2008 07:35:36 -0000

Brilliant Rick. Not that I don't care what the targets of this post do with the information. But the education here for up and coming marketers is p-r-i-c-e-l-e-s-s!

You just spelled out what one needs to do to be relevant, have a solid, healthy list of FANS, and build a thriving business.

Re: Twitter is a Sentient Being

Jack Humphrey — Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:37:44 -0000

Rick,

WIRED won't pick it up unless you include tips like "How to Hi-5 Someone" or "Sign Our Battlestar Glactica Petition!" in the article. :)

I kid the WIRED Magazine.

Great article - do more of em!

Re: Meet Carrie Wilkerson

Jack Humphrey — Wed, 22 Oct 2008 17:41:44 -0000

See, this is what's been missing all along. Rick's ideas, products, etc. with a face that's not nearly so hard to look at.

Carrie - Rick had a full head of hair when he started working online. I'm just sayin...

Re: Importance of Website Design In your SEO campaign

Jack Humphrey — Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:48:25 -0000

Cutting down on the number of plugins you use helps in many ways as well. Just because they have a plugin for everything doesn't mean you should use every one of them!

Re: The Declining Value Of Redundant News Content On The Web

Jack Humphrey — Fri, 09 May 2008 13:59:14 -0000

I agree wholeheartedly with this. One observation that I didn't see was that people really only flock to certain sites for their news. So at least publishing links to current stories is critical if you are the chosen filter for that news by a large readership.

People only have so much time and we largely assume regular web users know how to move through as many sites as we monitor on a daily basis, which isn't true.

The view above is like flying over a city in a helicopter. Not everyone has a helicopter nor would they know how to fly one if they did. So regular surfers don't get this macro view of the web and need stories to show up on the part of the web they visit the most.

Maybe not total re-posts of stories, but links for sure.

Re: Leaked Reports & Software Demos for Torrent Traffic Generation

Jack Humphrey — Thu, 14 Jun 2007 01:09:15 -0000

Badass idea Michelle. I heard this at one of Yanik Silver's first underground seminars and totally forgot about this lost world of possibilities.

Thanks for the reminder - will try it with Web2Submitter software!

Re: How To Get Traffic From A-List Bloggers

Jack Humphrey — Thu, 07 Feb 2008 13:28:46 -0000

I think if Duncan knew how we'd be using this and the value of this thing he might think twice about giving it away again!

It is really getting me some good traffic just from the way it was intended to be used.

But then...there's this other way to use it that REALLY kicks butt...

Whoops, phone's ringing, gotta go.

:)

Re: MLM Anyone?

Jack Humphrey — Mon, 11 Feb 2008 13:28:00 -0000

I have been secretly pulling $500-$700 per month out of Empowerism for a couple of years now.

I never talk about MLM to people because my market hates it. But since you asked...

They have great metrics on the backend and you get to track everything that's going on. I have Ewen Chia in my downline and the boy is bringing in like 100 people a month or more.

I got 9 new member notifications today alone.

Great lead program that I am using to increase my list size as well.

If only I personally worked harder at it, who knows how big it would get. I've never had the bottom of a matrix start to fill out with people before and I've belonged to a lot of these things in the past decade.

This is the only one that people stick with month after month without me having to backfill.

And I do ZERO promotion of it. Get a few killers under you and you really just have to check in each month and request payment.

Be active and I'm sure you could do 10 times better than me.

Re: How To Get Traffic From A-List Bloggers

Jack Humphrey — Mon, 18 Feb 2008 10:42:08 -0000

We must to move beyond the knee-jerk reaction to automation assuming it is going to be used as a spam tool before anything else.

It's like we expect the worst just because people will use anything to spam if possible.

Those people aren't us, yet we all spend an inordinate amount of time and energy admonishing spammers and even worrying about ourselves being spammy.

Any software that does things like this can be used for spam. And people will use it for spam.

But nothing has changed AT ALL. This particular software doesn't add any significant spam to the load we are already getting every day and have to moderate anyway.

You as a blogger will not have to moderate any more than you do now because of this software.

Unless, people are using it to supply your site with user generated content that IS good enough to post but WAS generated because they used this software.

Where's the harm in that?

If we start assuming the best and stop worrying about what spammers are doing we'll spend a lot less time on discussions that aren't going to change anything in the end anyway.

I assume everyone here will use this and any other software properly. Innocent until PROVEN guilty.

If we all take a stab at the positive we can seea big decline in the amount of lip service we feel we must give on anything new that comes out as it pertains to how people are going to use it to spam.

Hell, let's stop giving spammers ideas if nothing else!

Re: How To Get Traffic From A-List Bloggers

Jack Humphrey — Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:22:47 -0000

1. The point is not to be first.
The point is to be relevant in your market. If you are not engaged in the discussion going on in your niche, how relevant can you be? Being higher in the comments than #145 is better.

2. The results have been more traffic from blogs I've used it on. Period. More traffic.

3. It's not a tool that's for sale, it's neither Michelle's nor my tool, and we are not the kind of people to throw up something junky since we both rely on our reputation for repeat visits.

Its kind of hard to fight with people for their own successful marketing campaigns. Seems kind of out of balance that you'd have to PUSH people to look at tools that might get them more traffic if they use them.

Seems like they'd want to and we wouldn't have to rescue them from their own paranoia and angst against their own success.

Re: Did someone Unfollow You on Twitter? Get Notified

Jack Humphrey — Tue, 31 Mar 2009 21:39:04 -0000

If they are losers or morons, isn't it a good thing that they aren't following you anymore? lol

Re: 25 Tips for Marketing Your Blog

Jack Humphrey — Wed, 21 Jun 2006 00:28:27 -0000

I got my Analytics account about 2-3 weeks after putting in for it. It really is thorough - way more than I even need to get excited about how people are moving to, through, and from my site!

Re: Ten Tips for Lead Generation Landing Pages

Jack Humphrey — Thu, 27 Sep 2007 18:26:52 -0000

Well done article. Making your landing pages scan-able is one thing, but writing an article like this and making it scan-able is an art in itself. The section headings make a huge difference. I wish all the blogs I read were as focused on scan-ability.

Thanks for the tips!

Re: Reader Poll: Podcast Popularity vs Live Streaming Audio

Jack Humphrey — Mon, 06 Apr 2009 12:27:16 -0000

While I provide a live stream on BlogTalkRadio show, most of my listeners come through downloads at a later date.

I guess I consider streaming to be live rather than clicking on a pre-recorded audio player to listen.

Re: Google Personal Profiles

Jack Humphrey — Tue, 28 Apr 2009 18:43:08 -0000

Maria,

I think we're already done when it comes to what Google knows and shows about us. Funny thing is, we all "outed" ourselves just by being online. Maybe that's not so funny, now that I think about it. Anyway, no point in worrying about it now. We'll all be assimilated by the Goog and there's nothing anyone can do about it. :)

Re: Inc Magazine and Twitter’s Biz Stone, I Stand Corrected

Jack Humphrey — Sat, 02 May 2009 00:25:35 -0000

I was JUST going to Twitter about this! I agree with your publicist - stir the pot. Great post!

Re: Seven Great Bloggers who Google Friend Connect

Jack Humphrey — Mon, 01 Jun 2009 19:47:53 -0000

It's nice to be in on something that's going to be big but that has yet to be discovered and understood by the masses, no?

I'm one of the few - add me to the list! :)