Hello!
The comments on this profile are unclaimed and thus are unverified.
Do they belong to you? Claim these comments.
colleen
Is this you? Claim Profile »
5 months ago
in Find Out Whether A Twitterer Is Annoying Or Not? on Tech Xav
True enough avfguy, I think they intend you to use while simultaneously looking at the profile of a potential follow. But peoples followcost sometimes changes over time. I suggested to followcost that they just produce a grid of the followcost of *all* those I follow sorted Then I could look at the tweets of the top 10 or so easily and see if they were really worth all the bandwidth. A more neutral term for what he is calculating rather than annoyance is just bandwidth. Some things are worth the bandwidth somethings are not.
10 months ago
in When the Base Revolts on The Washington Independent
Don't look now but the so-called 'vital center' is speaking at the GOP convention this year.
10 months ago
in Haunted by Elizabeth on The Washington Independent
I've been trying to avoid them and indeed have given up entirely on one blog but this is the third essay I've read online castigating Elizabeth Edwards for 'allowing' her husband to run.
Her husband's behavior was and, if the interview I saw is any indication, is politically and morally indefensible as is the behavior of the woman he choose to have an affair with. But Elizabeth Edwards? Please. A woman with two young children and stage 4 cancer did not humiliate herself and her husband by making his affair public?
Why not attack Hillary Clinton for enabling her husbands doglike proclivities throughout their pathetic sham of a marriage. Or the increasing numbers of political wives and former wives who have suddenly discovered that their husbands prefer to have sex with men? Why not chastise Laura and Barbara Bush and both of John McCain's wives? Why publically criticise a woman with 2 young children and stage 4 cancer and question why she didn't tell the world that her marriage was a sham and that, because of this, her husband wasn't qualified to have a political career?
I do not get it.
Her husband's behavior was and, if the interview I saw is any indication, is politically and morally indefensible as is the behavior of the woman he choose to have an affair with. But Elizabeth Edwards? Please. A woman with two young children and stage 4 cancer did not humiliate herself and her husband by making his affair public?
Why not attack Hillary Clinton for enabling her husbands doglike proclivities throughout their pathetic sham of a marriage. Or the increasing numbers of political wives and former wives who have suddenly discovered that their husbands prefer to have sex with men? Why not chastise Laura and Barbara Bush and both of John McCain's wives? Why publically criticise a woman with 2 young children and stage 4 cancer and question why she didn't tell the world that her marriage was a sham and that, because of this, her husband wasn't qualified to have a political career?
I do not get it.
2 years ago
in Friday’s Feast #116 on Lori's Reflections
I totally agree with your stress. That is a HUGE stressor for me. HATE it. see, getting fumed up already just thinking about it!
4 years ago
in I’ve done another Damo! on Pandammonium
Yeah I'll make sure I'll get plenty of rest before I come to Cambridge if this weekend was anything to go by.
4 years ago
in I’ve done a Damo! on Pandammonium
and you failed to mention shagging the quaver? Shame on you
4 years ago
in 99.1 WHFS disappears on Jason Lancaster
I agree that satellite radio is the way to go at this rate. Infinity sucks. Can we form a movement to turn 98 Rock into a Latin station instead and make HFS play freeform music like in the old days? Please?
