<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Enoch Roote</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/fd168ee3ca749023b6f08013b738e550/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 10:41:07 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Safety Nets, Growth, and Liberation from Family</title><link>http://willwilkinson.disqus.com/safety_nets_growth_and_liberation_from_family/#comment-3710972</link><description>Here's a way to understand it:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If the thing we all have in common is that we pay for each others' health care, then all our health care is done. We don't have to worry about it. We sort-of already do this, by the way, with insurance, but because the insurance is profit-motivated, it doesn't accept as much risk and is exclusionary.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So we already have a collectivist health care system mapped into capitalism, with some middle-men ending up really rich, at the expense of those whose conditions are risky to insure.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If my parents can't afford insurance, I end up being tied to them in a way that demands a sacrifice of my creativity. And the only reason this occurs is because some middle-men get to set the terms of the insurance policy, so that they can make money.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Taking the profit motive out, we end up with insurance for whoever needs it. Suddenly, my parents aren't uninsurable any more, and I am free to support them to whatever degree I choose, allowing me to maximize my individual economic liberty.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The middle men don't like this fact, and they'd really like to keep their stranglehold on my creativity. But should we let them?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Enoch Roote</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 19:45:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Texas Ahead Of California On Wind Power</title><link>http://treehuggercomments.disqus.com/texas_ahead_of_california_on_wind_power/#comment-17481498</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There's some controversy over a Texas wind farm to be situated off the Gulf Coast. &lt;a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5387574" rel="nofollow"&gt;Here's an NPR story about it&lt;/a&gt;. The problem: It's right smack in the middle of a very important migratory flight path for birds.&lt;br  /&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Enoch Roote</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Sep 2006 13:51:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Yurts. Not Just for Hippies Anymore</title><link>http://treehuggercomments.disqus.com/yurts_not_just_for_hippies_anymore/#comment-17499711</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oregon State Parks are &lt;a href="http://www.oregon.gov/OPRD/PARKS/rustic.shtml#RUSTIC_YURTS" rel="nofollow"&gt;offering yurts for rent&lt;/a&gt; at some parks. Other parks are doing this, too. They're cheap and easy and efficient and good. Note that in the US, there are plenty of yurt manufacturers, though it might be nice to spend some time in a more traditionally-decorated example.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hippies have always been ahead of the curve. When will the viridians figure that out? :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Enoch Roote</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 02:23:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Soda Can Solar Panel</title><link>http://treehuggercomments.disqus.com/soda_can_solar_panel/#comment-17504207</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Aluminum and black paint in my water. Yum.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;The rest is good, though.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Enoch Roote</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:38:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Colbert does Bjorn Lomborg</title><link>http://treehuggercomments.disqus.com/colbert_does_bjorn_lomborg/#comment-17522235</link><description>&lt;p&gt;ATTACK THE VAGUE.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Enoch Roote</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 20:43:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Galveston on Stilts</title><link>http://treehuggercomments.disqus.com/galveston_on_stilts/#comment-17582393</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's important also to note that the silt that was pumped to cover Galveston came from the bay side, and created much of the channel that allowed Houston to become a viable port. In order to solve its problems, Galveston created more for itself.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Enoch Roote</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 10:41:07 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>