http://disqus.com/people/fcf0891046388212ee88881d40a3204b/enThu, 06 Nov 2008 21:00:30 -0000http://danielrm26.disqus.com/the_logical_solution_to_the_civil_union_vs_marriage_debate/#comment-4358836<p>I see some problems with this.</p><br><p>A church marries two people. In many companies a spouse gets health benefits. I see boatloads of lawsuits on this one.</p><br><p>What if a church decides to marry a man and a dog? What if a church decides to marry a man and a minor?? What about the law on the books for the minor?</p>Dave FourputtThu, 26 Jun 2008 22:41:46 -0000http://danielrm26.disqus.com/inspiring/#comment-4360113<p>It's always a treat to see Socialists getting along.</p><br><p>Very uplifting.</p>Dave FourputtThu, 06 Nov 2008 21:00:30 -0000http://drm.disqus.com/the_logical_solution_to_the_civil_union_vs_marriage_debate/#comment-11190548<p>I see some problems with this.</p><br><p>A church marries two people. In many companies a spouse gets health benefits. I see boatloads of lawsuits on this one.</p><br><p>What if a church decides to marry a man and a dog? What if a church decides to marry a man and a minor?? What about the law on the books for the minor?</p>Dave FourputtThu, 26 Jun 2008 22:41:46 -0000http://drm.disqus.com/inspiring/#comment-11209716<p>It's always a treat to see Socialists getting along.</p><br><p>Very uplifting.</p>Dave FourputtThu, 06 Nov 2008 21:00:30 -0000