<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Jeff Hansen</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/fcd9703339e8300650f86ed52d2e89e9/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 15:48:14 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Public Broadcasting&amp;#8217;s Platforms for Interaction</title><link>http://toddmundt.disqus.com/public_broadcasting8217s_platforms_for_interaction/#comment-1493004</link><description>&lt;a href="http://Gather.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Gather.com&lt;/a&gt; and Public Action are both important to track as efforts to provide new public broadcasting platforms for interaction with listeners/users. Todd's comments are very helpful as I've not seen much analysis yet. I'd like to add that I think public radio could do a lot more with the simple live call-in that would greatly enhance interactivity with listeners at stations. I don't mean to the exclusion of new platforms like &lt;a href="http://gather.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;gather.com&lt;/a&gt;. At KUOW we're experimenting with this in the evening on a new program called Power of Voice, Monday's at 8:00 p.m. I would love to get feedback from people like you who are interested in this subject. You can hear the show live Mondays at 8:00 p.m. PT on our stream or air, or Tuesday morning at 10 a.m. PT on KUOW2 (go to &lt;a href="http://kuow.org" rel="nofollow"&gt;kuow.org&lt;/a&gt; and click on KUOW2), or as a podcast from iTunes. Thanks Jeff</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeff Hansen</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2006 12:59:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chris Anderson: Ready to be Microchunked?</title><link>http://toddmundt.disqus.com/chris_anderson_ready_to_be_microchunked/#comment-1494051</link><description>Content causes listening so naturally most listeners are far more loyal to the content than the delivery mechanism. This explains at least in part why less than 10% of listeners pledge money to "the station". And even then it is often because they feel they are supporting their favorite "program", read content.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeff Hansen</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:37:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This NPR API is a BIG deal.</title><link>http://toddmundt.disqus.com/this_npr_api_is_a_big_deal/#comment-935234</link><description>Agreed! Here are some other examples of sharing content - we aired a recent Richard Florida speech on our local program "Speakers' Forum" and last night after the broadcast it was the #2 entry on a Richard Florida Google search. And in the National Newsroom of the Future project we're working to increase sharing of local news content across stations nationally, and there is a similar effort between local talk shows on stations in KOPB's Thinking Out Loud partnership group. Leveredging content for greater access and use is a good strategy.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeff Hansen</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 14:37:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Other Side of the Glass: BackStory</title><link>http://themediavore.disqus.com/other_side_of_the_glass_backstory/#comment-4029543</link><description>We aired their Thanksgiving program on Monday and got quite a few postive emails from listeners.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeff Hansen</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 15:48:14 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>