<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for John shakib</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/fcb3257494354aa41858bed1809518d2/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 15:43:29 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Better than Synthetic Photosynthesis?</title><link>http://sustain.disqus.com/better_than_synthetic_photosynthesis/#comment-3720935</link><description>This discovery is certainly an important one.  It is sad that there is no mention of it in the media.  I wonder why.  As mentioned in the write up this dicovery or invention could be the reuseable energy source mankind has been looking for.  Several years ago I realized photosynthesis is the answer and thought if we could synthesis the firt stage of it we have endless source of energy.  The product that result for you process, hydrogen, is a very good source and easy to store.  Please let me know why there is not any mention of this in the media.&lt;br&gt;Thanks</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John shakib</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 15:43:29 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>