<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Al</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/fbb024db3c3eb0fd2660b16b5174b220/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 08:58:18 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Which direction do you stir?</title><link>http://justinhartman.disqus.com/which_direction_do_you_stir/#comment-1849722</link><description>Nice - just the kind of random stats that I like to see.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What software did you use to draw those nice graphs?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Al</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 08:58:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Insane airport queue</title><link>http://alistairpott.disqus.com/insane_airport_queue/#comment-2386281</link><description>Sorry guys - it was late on Friday</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Al</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 09:58:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cat-cam is one of the coolest things I&amp;#8217;ve seen</title><link>http://alistairpott.disqus.com/cat_cam_is_one_of_the_coolest_things_i8217ve_seen/#comment-2386305</link><description>I suppose that we are going down a road to saying that privacy has been violated unless consent is provided.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For instance, this cat's privacy has definitely been violated because he had no choice in the matter!  Similarly people who pop up on Google Street Views also had no choice in the matter -&amp;gt; privacy violation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The alternative extreme says that &lt;i&gt;any&lt;/i&gt; information stored about you is a violation of privacy unless you provide consent.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That in turn would be messy and would hurt innovation.  So what should we do?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Al</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 11:09:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rock paper scissors championships</title><link>http://alistairpott.disqus.com/rock_paper_scissors_championships/#comment-2386409</link><description>Dave you need to get in touch with your feminine side</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Al</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 11:56:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hiking up Table Mountain - the round route</title><link>http://alistairpott.disqus.com/hiking_up_table_mountain_the_round_route/#comment-2386436</link><description>Anytime Carolla</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Al</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 11:34:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When being special means nothing - the Anthropic Principle</title><link>http://alistairpott.disqus.com/when_being_special_means_nothing_the_anthropic_principle/#comment-2386448</link><description>You are assuming, without proof, that only our universe is relevant.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That seems a reasonable assumption except that it means that only universes populated by life are relevant.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Al</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 04:16:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cool tools - Launchy</title><link>http://alistairpott.disqus.com/cool_tools_launchy/#comment-2386455</link><description>There are a few reasons why Launchy is a better solution:&lt;br&gt; - Google Desktop provides a lot of other functionality so it's a resource hog. If you don't like that functionality (I don't) then it's not worth it&lt;br&gt; - Because Launchy is developed specifically for this I feel that it does and easier and better job&lt;br&gt; - I suspect that Launchy runs faster that G Desktop&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However, if you are using Google Desktop and if it works as you say it does, then you get the same functionality - which is awesome.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Al</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 02:38:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is organic necessarily good?</title><link>http://alistairpott.disqus.com/is_organic_necessarily_good/#comment-2386524</link><description>You could argue that by altering (in most cases significantly) the environment farming is bad for it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There may be "certain farming practices, under specific conditions" where farming may &lt;b&gt;aid&lt;/b&gt; some parts of the environment (still questionable), but in general farming chews up environmental resources (space, nutrients, etc).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Converting veld to farmland is bad for the environment.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Al</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 02:21:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is organic necessarily good?</title><link>http://alistairpott.disqus.com/is_organic_necessarily_good/#comment-2386522</link><description>Humans are indeed bad for the environment (in general)! It all comes down to how you define what is good/bad for the environment.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I still believe that in general (using most broader definitions of good/bad) farming is detrimental to the environment.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Besides, this isn't the point of the blog article. Even if farming is not &lt;i&gt;necessarily&lt;/i&gt; bad for the environment (I still say that in general it is), organic farming is not necessarily good, and in fact in the long run is probably bad (depends on definitions of good/bad).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Al</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 02:26:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2007 Darwin Awards</title><link>http://alistairpott.disqus.com/2007_darwin_awards/#comment-2386613</link><description>Lynda, I am really sorry that you lost your brother - especially in such a needless fashion.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However, from the reports that I have now read (including your interview) I think it quite clear that the reports are actually &lt;b&gt;true&lt;/b&gt; - he was playing chicken with his friend and I now know he was also drunk. It seems that he was trying to get out of the way when he was hit - but that doesn't make the report (as related above) untrue.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I understand how you probably find it hard that people have passed this story around - I can't really imagine how it would feel. I hope that you are able to come to terms with your grief soon.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Al</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 02:01:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Demo of colorblind vision</title><link>http://alistairpott.disqus.com/demo_of_colorblind_vision/#comment-2386722</link><description>Yeah you really do miss out. But there is a type of colorblindness which apparently makes camouflage less effective. So people with that colorblindness would kick ass at the game reserves!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Al</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 10:17:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The end of a rabbit</title><link>http://alistairpott.disqus.com/the_end_of_a_rabbit/#comment-2386820</link><description>or a small rabbit...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Al</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 12:14:58 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>