<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Pete</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/fb52bc47132c10e3c57820005dfde9e2/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 21:26:37 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: I (May) Have a New Platform</title><link>http://unionsquareventures.disqus.com/i_may_have_a_new_platform_20/#comment-314893</link><description>Or maybe we will look at the users of App Engine like we look HTMl coders that use dreamweaver....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'll roll my own thanks&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Pete&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://localhero.biz/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://localhero.biz/&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pete</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 00:43:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Difference Between Wordpress and Facebook</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/the_difference_between_wordpress_and_facebook/#comment-359209</link><description>I am someone who is buidling a blogging/search platform:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://localhero.biz/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://localhero.biz/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;and has deployed wordpress for several websites on a consulting basis.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; I think there are a few issues.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ultimately open platforms/software will win as they are so much more flexible and you ownnn your own data. I believe wordpress is one of the better platforms but as far as I can tell it is missing alot of features (content versioning, an api, a spider/feed reader, different content formats) which are essential for support of the next generation of products. Its a very good blogging platform but the future is integrating blogging with so much more.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pete</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 23:16:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AB Meta</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/ab_meta/#comment-367155</link><description>Please, please do not use AB Meta. This appears to be yet another proprietary fork.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Please get behind the W3C standard RDFa:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://rdfa.info/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://rdfa.info/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; And if you cant  do that use Microformats:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://microformats.org/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://microformats.org/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have already implemented both in the front end and am restructuring the backend to utilise their enormous potentai (look up sparql on google) on my website:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://localhero.biz/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://localhero.biz/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;These formats have enormous potential, are open, and are standards. The same cannot be said for AB meta.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pete</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 19:47:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The semantic elephant in the room - Google will settle the &amp;quot;top down vs. bottom up&amp;quot; debate for us</title><link>http://otcc.disqus.com/the_semantic_elephant_in_the_room_google_will_settle_the_quottop_down_vs_bottom_upquot_debate_for_us/#comment-367551</link><description>Philippe&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Most of the development on the web is bootom up and will be regardless of google or even the money involved. There are over a billion people on the we and even if a small percentage of hobbyists are working on bottom up semantic search this dwarfs google. I am currently adding a sparql to my own project that has yet to turn a dime:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://localhero.biz/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://localhero.biz/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Semantic search kills one of google advantages (accuracy) but it doesn't really have trust or relevance built in so time will tell......</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pete</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 21:26:37 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>