<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Tom</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/fa4dce14f005e4383f7ae4c3511f2ec1/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 09:51:43 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Moopost</title><link>http://cdcstudios.disqus.com/moopost/#comment-1438021</link><description>Nice!  Worked first time on my K2 based theme - a suggestion - how about different images for "closed" and "expanded" posts for the next version?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 May 2006 16:04:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AboutUs.org - Is it Ethical? &amp;raquo; Ajay - On the Road called Life</title><link>http://ajaydsouza.disqus.com/aboutusorg_is_it_ethical_raquo_ajay_on_the_road_called_life/#comment-5029546</link><description>My biggest concern is that even if I edit away my copyrighted content, it's still there in the History section.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;AboutUs should be "opt in" (in the same way that many sites like Technorati won't index your site unless you "ping" them) and should not editable by all and sundry.  Plus it needs to be possible to purge your history, so that copyrighted material is actually removed.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2006 13:09:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Song from the end of Portal Game</title><link>http://benshoemate.disqus.com/the_song_from_the_end_of_portal_game/#comment-5379683</link><description>The song is called "Still Alive" by Jonathan Coulton, I beleive it's on the Orange Box soundtrack (and as such should be available to download from iTunes or Amazon...)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;The Cake Is A Lie&lt;/i&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 09:51:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Stop writing AboutUs.org</title><link>http://pauloflaherty.disqus.com/stop_writing_aboutusorg/#comment-20356787</link><description>I absolutely agree with you, I didn't come off too badly, but I've seen entries on AboutUs.Org which have individual bloggers home addresses and telephone numbers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, as the site keeps a history of changes, it's impossible to remove information completely.  It's always still in the history.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2006 13:02:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Stop AboutUs.org from scraping your blog</title><link>http://pauloflaherty.disqus.com/stop_aboutusorg_from_scraping_your_blog/#comment-20356791</link><description>Well, the morning brings a change to the "&lt;a href="http://www.tvotw.co.uk/blog/go.php?http://www.aboutus.org/AboutUs:Concerns" rel="nofollow"&gt;concerns&lt;/a&gt;" page, a promise of manual deletion (once you prove you own the domain) - shame this "proof" isn't required to create and edit a record really...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He still hasn't explained the purpose of the site, or what "valuable service" it's providing...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 04:35:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hey Pirillo! What&amp;#8217;s an asshat?</title><link>http://pauloflaherty.disqus.com/hey_pirillo_what8217s_an_asshat/#comment-20356794</link><description>No problem at all - if we're lucky we might start seeing some more coverage of &lt;a href="http://aboutus.org" rel="nofollow"&gt;aboutus.org&lt;/a&gt;, and some awareness spreading to those webmasters who don't know their details are on there!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Sep 2006 15:04:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: HP can&amp;#8217;t but Canon can!</title><link>http://pauloflaherty.disqus.com/hp_can8217t_but_canon_can/#comment-20357234</link><description>A year after this post and I find myself fighting at LaserJet 1600 myself.  I wish I'd known before...  won't share on a network with restarting the print spooler every few minutes, and to top it all, HP's website is down "Service Unavailable" when I try to download a driver...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 18:32:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: HP can&amp;#8217;t but Canon can!</title><link>http://pauloflaherty.disqus.com/hp_can8217t_but_canon_can/#comment-20357236</link><description>Yeah, it seems better this morning, having downloaded the new drivers and firmware things seem a bit better...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 05:31:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gmail misses the obvious &amp;#8211; multiple signatures</title><link>http://pauloflaherty.disqus.com/gmail_misses_the_obvious_8211_multiple_signatures/#comment-20357523</link><description>Agree with you there - this is probably the biggest thing missing from G-Mail now - I've been using it with multiple email addresses for a while (by forwarding directly from my domain rather than POP3 pickup) - it'll correctly figure out which address the mail came through (so the reply gets the correct "from" address) so why can't they handle multiple signatures automatically too?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 09:57:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#8217;m back! My exile is over.</title><link>http://pauloflaherty.disqus.com/i8217m_back_my_exile_is_over/#comment-20357648</link><description>Finding a webhost with decent a decent support department is difficult, as any experiences you read about are generally, like yours, when things have been less than ideal.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I've had wildly varying experiences, however the one time I was in a similar situation (one of my sites had been compromised as had a spammer-script installed on it) the host at the time (1and1.co.uk) sent me an email alerting me to the exceptional load being produced by a script on the site, and the email included the filename of the scripts involved (which of course, turned out to be the spam-generator scripts) - no doubt in your situation something similar would have helped you too.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They then "disabled" the offending script (I think by removing it's execute permissions) and asked me to investigate.  Of course, I didn't need to re-enable the script!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I hope you do find a decent webhost with a good support dept.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 09:02:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How would you organize the Gmail menu?</title><link>http://pauloflaherty.disqus.com/how_would_you_organize_the_gmail_menu/#comment-20357884</link><description>Well, if they can't make the top menu "personalisable" for your Google ID, I'd have to agree with you, Reader should be on the top bar.  Personally, I'd swap it with Photos - on the basis that I want to access Gmail, Reader and Docuemnts several times a day, but I tend to only access Photos (although in reality I use Flickr) when I've got a set of photos to upload.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 11:23:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spouse 2.0 Day &amp;#8211; will you attend?</title><link>http://pauloflaherty.disqus.com/spouse_20_day_8211_will_you_attend/#comment-20357914</link><description>Oh dear.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Much as there is value in showing appreciation for your "better half" - why oh why do we need &lt;b&gt;another&lt;/b&gt; day when people are going to write endlessly long and romantic blog posts about it.  What's wrong with limiting this kind of behaviour to already established "Singles Awareness Day" on Feb 14th?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I suppose at least if every post is correctly tagged, it ought to be possible to filter them all out...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Me, Single - Yes, Bitter - Yes, and I don't need reminding of what I'm missing as a result.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(P.S. The openID seems broken - I can't put a website in the  box which doesn't have an OpenID server on it)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 06:54:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spouse 2.0 Day &amp;#8211; will you attend?</title><link>http://pauloflaherty.disqus.com/spouse_20_day_8211_will_you_attend/#comment-20357916</link><description>As I said, there is value in showing appreciation for your partner - but there's no need to plaster the internet with "Spouse 2.0" posts on the day in question.  Show your appreciation your way.  If she deserves more than one day of recognition (and I have no doubt that is the case - if I were lucky enough to have someone, I wouldn't limit my appreciation to just Feb 14th!) why not show your spouse that this is about &lt;b&gt;her&lt;/b&gt; and not just a reason for another post on a blog.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 07:13:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spouse 2.0 Day &amp;#8211; will you attend?</title><link>http://pauloflaherty.disqus.com/spouse_20_day_8211_will_you_attend/#comment-20357918</link><description>"Being grumpy about it" is the only way I can get in on the fun - my "rant" post on my blog is going to spread the word too, and if I had someone (and I was part of a Web 2.0 startup) I'd proably be enthusiastic about it too ;-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 07:29:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Disappearing tracks</title><link>http://pauloflaherty.disqus.com/disappearing_tracks/#comment-20358052</link><description>That does sometimes happen to me - if I've not listened to any music for a couple of days...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 09:05:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: HELLO, WHAT? NO! I&amp;#8217;M ON THE PHONE!</title><link>http://pauloflaherty.disqus.com/hello_what_no_i8217m_on_the_phone/#comment-20358354</link><description>Well, I suspect certain airlines (say, those who surcharge you for this little extras like Luggage and Checking In) will find a way to charge extra for sitting in the quiet area before they bother installing the systems to allow the calls to be made...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:39:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chrome beat Opera &amp;#8211; IE is next!! No really, it&amp;#8217;s true I tells ya!</title><link>http://pauloflaherty.disqus.com/chrome_beat_opera_8211_ie_is_next_no_really_it8217s_true_i_tells_ya/#comment-20358707</link><description>I can see myself sticking with Chrome on my office PC (which is so badly underpowered that the performance difference between Chrome and IE/Firefox is very significant) - but once I've gotten to the point where I'm missing the extensions of Firefox I'll be going right back (at least at home)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'll be keeping an eye on it though - although on my home PC, the performance differences are not significant, the multi-process approach has benefits...  but how long before Firefox and IE catch up on that one?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 13:11:09 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>