<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Patrick Byers</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/fa3069a171f276a0045c6120ce877bbc/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 11:57:31 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Let&amp;#039;s send some marketers to a treeless planet.</title><link>http://ericweaver.disqus.com/let039s_send_some_marketers_to_a_treeless_planet/#comment-23880474</link><description>I love this post.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Direct mail that wastes time, money and resources is irresponsible.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Does it make sense from an ROI standpoint? Sometimes, yes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Has my firm done it? Yes (see above for the reason why)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But the bar is being raised.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Marketing should absolutely be socially and environmentally responsible. But it also must be responsible from strategy to execution, it must respect its audiences and it must provide some ROI.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There are ways to make direct mail more responsible (offer opt-out on every piece; target lists better, etc.), but sometimes the most responsible form of direct marketing is to not do it at all.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Keep up the great work.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Patrick Byers&lt;br&gt;The Responsible Marketing Blog&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://responsiblemarketing.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://responsiblemarketing.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Patrick Byers</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 04:12:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Top 5 Twitter Tools</title><link>http://nordquist.disqus.com/my_top_5_twitter_tools/#comment-11879211</link><description>Nice list, Brett.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You picked ALL my faves - these are the apps I use daily. I respect your opinion so I'm glad to see I'm not missing any obvious apps. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, as far as mobile is concerned, I've had an iPhone since they came out. I have Twitterific on my phone, but to be honest, I use &lt;a href="http://m.twitter.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://m.twitter.com&lt;/a&gt; over 90% of the time. It's super lightweight and fast, and works just fine for catching up or firing off a quick tweet.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Have a great holiday, and I'll see you online. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Patrick Byers</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Patrick Byers</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 11:57:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft wins award for years shortest media release</title><link>http://inquisitr.disqus.com/microsoft_wins_award_for_years_shortest_media_release/#comment-3105518</link><description>I'll keep it short.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That's a hoot.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Patrick Byers</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 00:57:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Using Social Media for Social Good</title><link>http://tonystewardblog.disqus.com/using_social_media_for_social_good/#comment-4046809</link><description>Hello Tony,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thank you for posting "Using Social Media to Create Social Good" on your blog. That's exactly what I was hoping for --- for people to view this, share it, and for others to put it to good use. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The fact is, social media is the best tool we have to help create social good. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yes, I am a Christian, but am working to spread these ideas, along with the concept of Responsible Marketing, to anyone that will listen. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Every weekday, I blog about the collision between conscience and commerce--the challenges we face every day if we want to be a marketer AND a person of conscience on the  the Responsible Marketing Blog here:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://responsiblemarketing.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://responsiblemarketing.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I notice you are on Twitter --- I'm following you now. You can follow me at &lt;a href="http://twitter.com/patrickbyers" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://twitter.com/patrickbyers&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Happy marketing. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Patrick Byers</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Patrick Byers</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:00:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ads or No</title><link>http://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/ads_or_no/#comment-8516007</link><description>Chris,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Seems most people posting don't mind ads, as long as they are tasteful. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I enjoy your blog and would hate to see something tacky pollute your good work. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Tacky is one thing, but what happens if ads are served for products or companies that don't approve of? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now that ain't cool.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'd suggest you connect to an ad platform that gives you more control, even if it means you give up a little cash. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;YOU are a rockstar and you've got a great brand, Chris. It's worth a hell of a lot more than you may realize. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Happy Marketing. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Patrick Byers&lt;br&gt;The Responsible Marketing Blog&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://responsiblemarketing.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://responsiblemarketing.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Patrick Byers</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 02:13:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Mass Email Works</title><link>http://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/how_mass_email_works/#comment-8519388</link><description>Hello Chris,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Seth Godin says if a message isn't anticipated, personalized and relevant, it's SPAM.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anticipated: NO&lt;br&gt;Personalized: YES&lt;br&gt;Relevant: YES&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But it's not that easy. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I ACCEPT messages from my social network, and I admit, if some folks sent me an unsolicited message, it might be the straw that broke the camel's back, and I might unfriend them. Too much signal-to-noise, not enough value. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But I read your blog and follow your tweets with great interest. You bring value and you've built trust with your social network -- that's the cornerstone of your success. If you disappeared off the radar screen, it might take a day or two, but I'd notice and I wouldn't be alone. Though I wasn't specifically anticipating your email, I do ANTICIPATE valuable conversations with you, regardless of the way you send them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There's a huge difference between the two options, but the difference is in the value of the PERMISSION ASSET. You've built a lot of trust over the years and this asset is quite valuable to you (and something you don't ever want to lose).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Some don't treat this asset the same way. They might have a ton of connections, but they aren't nearly as meaningful. They are using their network instead of building a relationship. For example, I've noticed on twitter, someone I follow is starting to occasionally imbed sponsored messages. What? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I would suggest that if someone called you a spammer, you have a low-trust relationship with them. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And if that's the case, they clearly haven't been paying attention to what you've been saying and just don't know you very well. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Keep on keepin' on!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Patrick Byers&lt;br&gt;The Responsible Marketing Blog&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://responsiblemarketing.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://responsiblemarketing.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Patrick Byers</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 12:34:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 100 Personal Branding Tactics Using Social Media</title><link>http://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/100_personal_branding_tactics_using_social_media/#comment-8520219</link><description>I've been speaking on personal branding (I call it "Personal Positioning") since 1996. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is the best list of its kind I've ever seen. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I've bookmarked and will share this far and wide.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Patrick Byers</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 01:24:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 50 Ideas on Using Twitter for Business</title><link>http://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/50_ideas_on_using_twitter_for_business/#comment-8523410</link><description>Really helpful post, Chris. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm beginning to wonder if I'll ever beat you to the punch on a post...I was working on a similar post but you've done it now, and done it better. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So, thank you, now I can just share your post and write something else. :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Patrick Byers</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 01:32:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You Can Do Your Job Without Twitter</title><link>http://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/you_can_do_your_job_without_twitter/#comment-8524743</link><description>I'm in agreement with most of those commenting above. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Social media is like all new technology--it's just another step in the process. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This platform will be built on like others before it, not unlike our progress from telegraph to telephone to fax to mobile phone to mobile computing. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The thing is, none of the progress before felt so, well, personal. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And that's what makes social media so cool.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Patrick Byers</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 07:25:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WARNING: Do NOT load Quechup</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/warning_do_not_load_quechup/#comment-9689773</link><description>Another great post, Robert.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I've been promoting social networking with clients, friends and colleagues. I agree, sites like this are adding to 'social networking fatigue.'&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In fact, friends that I've connected with through legit sits like Plaxo, Facebook and LinkedIn simply aren't responding when I have sent them Spock and a few other requests.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What's more, the tech laggards in my address book won't even respond to simple Plaxo address update requests.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Learning about (or worse, an experience with) sites like Quechup could scare them away from social networking altogether.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And that would truly suck.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Patrick Byers&lt;br&gt;The Responsible Marketing Blog&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://responsiblemarketing.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://responsiblemarketing.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Patrick Byers</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 11:00:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 200+ Internet Marketing Gurus on Twitter</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/200_internet_marketing_gurus_on_twitter/#comment-9422910</link><description>responsible marketing evangelist, marketing strategist, speaker, founder of Outsource Marketing&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/patrickbyers" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://twitter.com/patrickbyers&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Blog&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://responsiblemarketing.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://responsiblemarketing.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Patrick Byers</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 02:32:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Network Solutions Implements New &amp;#8220;Front Running&amp;#8221; Policy; Is it Any Better?</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/network_solutions_implements_new_8220front_running8221_policy_is_it_any_better/#comment-9425819</link><description>Interesting topic. Whether it's front running, domain tasting or not, I applaud Network Solutions for taking a small step in the right direction. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It would have been nice if they would have done this a long time ago. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Patrick Byers&lt;br&gt;The Responsible Marketing Blog&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://responsiblemarketing.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://responsiblemarketing.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Patrick Byers</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 05:17:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Starts Imposing &amp;#8220;Following&amp;#8221; Limits to Prevent Spam; Your Thoughts?</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/twitter_starts_imposing_8220following8221_limits_to_prevent_spam_your_thoughts/#comment-9432025</link><description>I don't have a problem with this. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I review every new follower and at least half are people peddling something I don't want. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If someone has something worth listening to, they'll get the followers. It takes time, and you have to bring value, but it will happen.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;patrick byers's last blog post..&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheResponsibleMarketingBlog/~3/367874469/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Are you ready to compete?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Patrick Byers</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 04:02:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Let&amp;#8217;s send some marketers to a treeless planet.</title><link>http://branddialogue.disqus.com/let8217s_send_some_marketers_to_a_treeless_planet/#comment-16077254</link><description>I love this post. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Direct mail that wastes time, money and resources is irresponsible. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Does it make sense from an ROI standpoint? Sometimes, yes. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Has my firm done it? Yes (see above for the reason why)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But the bar is being raised. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Marketing should absolutely be socially and environmentally responsible. But it also must be responsible from strategy to execution, it must respect its audiences and it must provide some ROI. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There are ways to make direct mail more responsible (offer opt-out on every piece; target lists better, etc.), but sometimes the most responsible form of direct marketing is to not do it at all. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Keep up the great work. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Patrick Byers&lt;br&gt;The Responsible Marketing Blog&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://responsiblemarketing.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://responsiblemarketing.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Patrick Byers</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 04:12:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Tool, Tool!</title><link>http://whatleydude.disqus.com/social_tool_tool/#comment-18550824</link><description>Great metaphor, here. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mind if I use it? We've had clients tell us similar things. Always good to hear they might be interested. Problem is, SM is often being considered as a way to save money. Arghh. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Keep up the great work. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Patrick</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Patrick Byers</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 00:22:48 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>