<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Uli Kusterer</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/f9e908d2ee5680c0fd2f5536ede7cb9c/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 09:41:12 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Obligatory WWDC Wrap-Up and Leopard Analysis</title><link>http://toxicsoftware.disqus.com/obligatory_wwdc_wrap_up_and_leopard_analysis/#comment-1655995</link><description>My suggestion would be to try to position your code that works close to how Apple's works as a compatibility layer for older OS versions. I.e. I wrote my Carbon-based speech synthesis class in a way that allows exchanging it for NSSpeechSynthesizer pretty much straight. The only difference is mine has a few additional features (which is why I haven't switched to Apple's code yet).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of course, you can't really do that yet, since the new APIs haven't been announced to the general public and may be subject to change (*and then there's that pesky NDA thing), but you could try getting a head start at least.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Uli Kusterer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 09:41:12 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>