<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Vincent van Wylick</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/f84abb73b2e7a43f6da7bd09f9598083/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 21:27:02 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: How Many People Are Missing The Point of Twitter?</title><link>http://socialtimes.disqus.com/how_many_people_are_missing_the_point_of_twitter/#comment-1574191</link><description>It's not about not getting Twitter, it's about not benefiting from it. As soon as I started following more than 30 people, the value of Twitter drastically decreased for me because I did not want to put more than 10-20 mins per day into following that medium. The damage has been done, but I wonder if other people feel the same way. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If I no longer listen to them, and they no longer listen to me, then it's just a bunch of individualistic people creating a stream of noise. Much like the little dots you would see on a TV that's not connected to a channel. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I kind of equate commenting on blogs to that too. So many blogs, so many comments, and nobody can keep track of them all. In two days, I won't even remember that I commented here, so what is the value of that comment? All very philosophical, I know.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vincent van Wylick</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:37:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How TMZ Gets Scoops</title><link>http://paidcontent.disqus.com/how_tmz_gets_scoops/#comment-18902721</link><description>where&amp;#39;s the scandal? You think all those paparazzi chased Prince Di out of the goodness/badness of their own heart? Greed, pure and utter greed. And tabloids fuel it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vincent van Wylick</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 21:27:02 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>