<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Jack</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/f77695e9b1f68374c08d589dfd20cbed/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:00:20 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Bodega Profile - Remírez de Ganuza</title><link>http://catavino.disqus.com/bodega_profile_remarez_de_ganuza/#comment-2416850</link><description>Great article, Ryan! I've only tasted the 2000 Reserva, which I really liked. I'll have to look for Remirez's wines here.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 11:06:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bodega Profile - Remírez de Ganuza</title><link>http://catavino.disqus.com/bodega_profile_remarez_de_ganuza/#comment-2416849</link><description>The November, 2005 House &amp;amp; Garden has a very nice article by Jay McInerney on this winery, titled "The Perfectionist". He seemed pretty impressed. I'd give you a link, but their website seems quite adept at hiding such an article - nor could I find it via their "search engine".</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2006 21:40:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 100+ Varietals and Counting!</title><link>http://catavino.disqus.com/100_varietals_and_counting/#comment-2416860</link><description>Joanne and I are going for Two Hundred!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, I would have really liked to go to this dinner; hopefully next year they'll do it in San Francisco (and then alternate every year).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 11:44:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spanish Chefs, Portuguese Wines, and a Week of Cava</title><link>http://catavino.disqus.com/spanish_chefs_portuguese_wines_and_a_week_of_cava/#comment-2417112</link><description>"*BTW while writing this, it actually took the SlowFood webpage approximately 15 minutes to load. I wonder if there is a connection….?"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Um, Ryan...didn't Gabriella tell you to NOT use the New York dial-up phone number?! :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 02:11:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Catalan Mushrooms</title><link>http://catavino.disqus.com/catalan_mushrooms/#comment-2417118</link><description>We've been to that market (in December, 1999) - I am so envious that it's within walking distance of you! I particularly remember all of the fish.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 12:13:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: European Union Reforms</title><link>http://catavino.disqus.com/european_union_reforms/#comment-2417198</link><description>Adding the varietal would be a tremendous boost in sales. (Allowing any bottle shape/color would help a region like Alsace, too.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But saying the consumer doesn't want to know who the producer of a wine is so, very, very wrong.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I doubt we'll ever see true wine label reform in Europe. Instead, they'll argue about it forever and while watching others come in take a much bigger chunk of thier market.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 11:04:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WBW 29 - Biodynamic Wines</title><link>http://catavino.disqus.com/wbw_29_biodynamic_wines/#comment-2417286</link><description>Great find, Gabriella! I checked, and I see it's available in the US via Eric Solomon. Their profile doesn't mention biodynamics, but I've emailed them as to get the real scoop. :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Loved your story!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 17:14:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wine Labeling Law</title><link>http://catavino.disqus.com/wine_labeling_law/#comment-2417307</link><description>The thing about all of the big government agencies, whether its the FDA or whomever, is the people running them ALL come from big food and big ag. And that's who they cater to. Little guys have no say and real common sense goes out the window. So you have tastelss UHP milk rather than raw milk. So you have idiotic warning labels (like sulphites in wine; they're in lots of foods but only wine has a warning on the label). Nor is there any proof that drinking wine causes birth defects. Drinking an excessive amount of anything can harm a mother and fetus...but wine is again singled out. I could go on and on and on...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 12:59:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wine Labeling Law</title><link>http://catavino.disqus.com/wine_labeling_law/#comment-2417303</link><description>Benjamin: The US is under-regulated with regards to INDUSTRIAL food safety - you just have to look at how Smithfield handles Hog pollution to understand this. Conversely, the US is over-regulated with regards to small farmers and producers, and in fact, treats everyone and everything like it's a mega-industrial producer.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 11:17:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wine Awards, Categories Without Contestants and the Birth of the Wine Blog Atlas</title><link>http://catavino.disqus.com/wine_awards_categories_without_contestants_and_the_birth_of_the_wine_blog_atlas/#comment-2417340</link><description>"Jack of all trades, master of none"...except me, of course. I'm trying to be a demi-master of many of them.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 00:08:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Latest Iberian Wine Update</title><link>http://catavino.disqus.com/latest_iberian_wine_update/#comment-2417376</link><description>Hmmm... I think if you were to poll top Spanish winemakers, by far the #1 story would be the excellent scores just received by Spanish wines in the new Wine Advocate by new writer Jay Miller. (To me, this is the Spanish wine story of the year, not just the week, ...and it's just days old.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;With five Spanish wines scoring, for the first time, 100 pts in the Wine Advocate, this elevates Spanish wines in the eyes of those who were ignorant of their quality.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The new Wine Advocate also has 305(!) dry Portugese wines reviewed by Mark Squires, with Quinta do Crasto being recognized as the top winery.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 23:22:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Remeberence of Viña Tondinia</title><link>http://catavino.disqus.com/a_remeberence_of_viaa_tondinia/#comment-2417579</link><description>I've shared a bottle of this and also tasted it and the not-yet-released 1996. I really like this style, but they're definitely not for everyone. I also have a bottle of the 1995 sitting in my cellar...I think I want to pick up a few more before drinking that one. - One Track Mind</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 02:07:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Penin&amp;#8217;s Spanish Wine Guide has been Released</title><link>http://catavino.disqus.com/penin8217s_spanish_wine_guide_has_been_released/#comment-2417559</link><description>I didn't know about this book until I too got the press release. Hope to see the book sometime!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 02:10:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Agustí Torelló - Kripta , High End Spanish Cava</title><link>http://catavino.disqus.com/agusta_torella3_kripta_high_end_spanish_cava/#comment-2417567</link><description>I want to know how that bottle stands up like that!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 02:13:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Catavino gets 60,000 Unique Visitors a Month - Oh, and We have a Bridge for Sale!</title><link>http://catavino.disqus.com/catavino_gets_60000_unique_visitors_a_month_oh_and_we_have_a_bridge_for_sale/#comment-2418265</link><description>Please, please, please - do not mention HITS. They couldn't be more meaningless! Every photo on a page is a hit, for example. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Please, please, please - do not mention Webalizer numbers. They're meaningless as they count every spider's visit in detail and every spider skews/counts differently. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I see no mention of Statcounter numbers - a damn lot of people (incl. me) pay/use them. Or what about Bloglines subscribers (which was pretty meaningful until recently when Google Reader numbers would became much more telling - but those, I believe, remain unknown to everyone outside of Google).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 10:48:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Catavino gets 60,000 Unique Visitors a Month - Oh, and We have a Bridge for Sale!</title><link>http://catavino.disqus.com/catavino_gets_60000_unique_visitors_a_month_oh_and_we_have_a_bridge_for_sale/#comment-2418253</link><description>"By the way, does anyone know if statcounter takes account of readers who are getting my content via RSS readers? " - No. I think the only way to get a count is to have an Ad/image in your feed. Anyway, that's what makes it extra tough to make any kind of accurate count.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 12:34:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wine Shop Profile - Celler de Gelida - Barcelona</title><link>http://catavino.disqus.com/wine_shop_profile_celler_de_gelida_barcelona/#comment-2418475</link><description>It would be cool to see some photos of inside the store.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 00:30:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: We&amp;#8217;re Sherry Educators</title><link>http://catavino.disqus.com/we8217re_sherry_educators/#comment-2418652</link><description>One thing I've noticed (but my sample size is small) is that wine geeks are practically afraid of drinking sherry. Beer? No problem. But sherry? It's, "I'll pass on that." This only changes at the end of the meal when they suddenly become willing to drink a sweet sherry as a dessert wine. But paring dry, quality sherry with food? No way, Pepe!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 11:16:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: We&amp;#8217;re Sherry Educators</title><link>http://catavino.disqus.com/we8217re_sherry_educators/#comment-2418653</link><description>I wonder if sherry simply suffers from the "you need to try something 20 or so times before you get to like it" rule?* Before delving seriously into wine, I drank a lot of Harvey's Bristol Cream. With food and by itself. Did you get a sense of people at the end of this wine class that most or all who didn't like sherry before do now?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;*Besides people not getting the ones that are supposed to be fresh/very young actually getting it that way - and thanks for reminding me about this - something I knew before but had forgotten.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 11:26:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Fear of Sherry</title><link>http://catavino.disqus.com/the_fear_of_sherry/#comment-2418699</link><description>Very good article, Gabriella! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Two things: Perhaps you can tell me how to identity a bottle that is fresh, less than 9 months old...? (Yeah, this is the problem...particularly on the West Coast, where many wines take an extra 4-6 months to get here (i.e., East Coast gets it in April, West Coast gets it in October).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Fear of Food is Such a Big Thing in the U.S. &lt;br&gt;It's funny how the food that people should fear is the food most of them eat regularly.&lt;br&gt;Wait, I meant sad, not funny.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 22:58:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do you Think Wineries Should Focus on Adaptation, Rather than Prevention? Interview with Richard Smart and Miguel Torres</title><link>http://catavino.disqus.com/do_you_think_wineries_should_focus_on_adaptation_rather_than_prevention_interview_with_richard_smart/#comment-2419681</link><description>(Almost off-topic...) Wine Universities/Schools teach winemakers how to control and manipulate their product. This is in the Adaptation category. Prevention, on the other hand, is in the Natural category - not generally done in our world. We'd rather filter something than have a product that doesn't require filtering. Why have diversity in the vineyards when you can use Round-up and other pesticides/chemicals?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 19:45:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wake up! Stupid Winery Marketing in Action!</title><link>http://catavino.disqus.com/wake_up_stupid_winery_marketing_in_action/#comment-2666008</link><description>You get worse email than I do.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 21:57:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2005 Movia Ribolla Gialla, Brda</title><link>http://vinifico.disqus.com/2005_movia_ribolla_gialla_brda/#comment-11051127</link><description>"Alto-Adige area" - I think you mean Friuli. Alto Adige is quite far (relatively). And Friuli has many more unique and interesting wines. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;btw, the 2002 Movia Veliko Rosso rocks.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:00:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://gary.tumblr.com/post/78881692</title><link>http://garyvaynerchuk.disqus.com/thread_30/#comment-6362347</link><description>Sorry, but Microsoft has been the lamest major software company for-ever. Think about Word and Excel 10-15 years ago. Now today. What advancements have they made? Yeah, I can't think of one either, much less 20. How is it that they are still a little awkward to use, rather being perfected? Seriously, how can they programs not be perfect at this point? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But they look good compared to their OSs. Each successive OS requires a much faster computer, rather than, what would make sense, a slower computer. Just think for a second (assuming you've been using an MS OS over then last 10-15 or 20 years) how often your computer has crashed. How often it has needed to be rebooted. Does this not make the case for Microsoft being one of the worst tech companies in history? I mean, aggravation must count. Speed must count. Time wasted must count. I do have to say they did a great job of elminating the competition, but this was not a benefit to consumers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As far as I'm concerned, Microsoft has had so many chances to kick some ass and can't deliver the score. They are props, not jets.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 00:45:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://gary.tumblr.com/post/78881692</title><link>http://garyvaynerchuk.disqus.com/thread_30/#comment-6362348</link><description>Ah, see, here's Dell illustrating my point:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dell.com/content/topics/global.aspx/solutions/en/winvista?c=us&amp;amp;cs=19&amp;amp;l=en&amp;amp;s=dhs" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.dell.com/content/topics/global.aspx/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Scroll down to "Why Windows Vista on Dell" and you learn that "GOOD" (512K of memory) is GREAT FOR "Booting the Operating System, without running applications or games"  (Please, don't spew laughter too much here. Well, okay, go for it.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's hard to believe that Dell will sell you a computer with an OS that needs so much memory that it's only good for booting. That's one de-luxe boat anchor!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 03:16:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to get started in wines&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://wlt.disqus.com/how_to_get_started_in_wines8230/#comment-8869556</link><description>Hi Joel,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;May I disagree? I find Wine Spectator to be strong as a wine lifestyle/travel magazine, but weak as a wine learning magazine. I also think you have to learn trust your own taste, rather than trust those ratings.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here's what I recommend: Find a knowledgable wine merchant near you, tell this person what you like and get his/her recommendations. You'll score more hits this way than choosing from High Scoring wines from a consumer wine magazine.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You open a bottle you don't like? Cap it, put it in the fridge. Try some the next night (after it's been out of the fridge for enough time to be at the right temperature). Still no good? Try again next night (or whatever). I've found that wines I don't like the day I open them eventually come around become quite enjoyable. Especially, young Burgundies.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- Jack</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 17:51:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Robert Parker should be ashamed of himself&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://wlt.disqus.com/robert_parker_should_be_ashamed_of_himself8230/#comment-8968288</link><description>That posts on that thread by Parker and "Mao" Squires were shameful. Frankly, you can't refrute illogical comments because, well, yeah, they're illogical. Just ignore.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 22:53:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What I&amp;#8217;m Drinking Tonight: Killer California Cabernet</title><link>http://drinksareonme.disqus.com/what_i8217m_drinking_tonight_killer_california_cabernet_43/#comment-20819788</link><description>Wow, just 12.5% alc? That's certainly a contender for lowest Napa cab alc.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, I think your definition of Napa Cult Cab differs from many other peoples...I have yet to spot this wine on a cult list where you find Harlan, Screaming Eagle, SHSS, Colgin, Araujo, and well, these guys all cost 8-20 times the price of this Homewood wine. Perhaps you meant Napa Value Cab? (Which are rare!)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Finally, I don't think it will be THAT daunting a task to find this bottle. A simple Wine-Searcher check shows the winery is still selling it for $35.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I do have to say you have me wanting to try a bottle. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 01:43:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ben &amp;amp; Jerry&amp;apos;s Climate Change College</title><link>http://treehuggercomments.disqus.com/ben_amp_jerryaposs_climate_change_college/#comment-17475237</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I can't help thinking that this is simply corporate greening PR.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;I Challenge Ben &amp; Jerry's this:&lt;br  /&gt;&lt;br&gt;1. Remove trans fat and High Fructose Corn Syrup from their products.&lt;br  /&gt;&lt;br&gt;2. Use organic ingredients. How about starting with organic milk?!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Wasn't their own original slogan, "Made from the best stuff on Earth."?  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Jul 2006 00:50:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NRDC: Shopper&amp;apos;s Guide for Paper Products</title><link>http://treehuggercomments.disqus.com/nrdc_shopperaposs_guide_for_paper_products/#comment-17478168</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I remember reading recently that the problem is that &lt;b&gt;recycled tissue and toilet paper doesn't sell.&lt;/b&gt; The reason: You buy it, you discover it's more like sandpaper than soft. You decide you don't want to wipe with sandpaper.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Until the recycled paper guys figure out how to get their paper soft, few are going to switch.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 00:19:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wolf Blass Wine in P.E.T. Bottles</title><link>http://treehuggercomments.disqus.com/wolf_blass_wine_in_pet_bottles/#comment-17479598</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wouldn't tasting the wine be the most important thing, rather seeing if the bottle can be broken? Sheesh!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 11:39:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Businesses Unite Against Kimberly-Clark</title><link>http://treehuggercomments.disqus.com/businesses_unite_against_kimberly_clark/#comment-17479797</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The thing here is that people try buying recyled fiber tissues and discover something; they aren't soft. No one wants tissues that are sandpaperish...so they don't sell. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 02:49:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Elite Natural Scrubbers From Japan</title><link>http://treehuggercomments.disqus.com/elite_natural_scrubbers_from_japan/#comment-17483596</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We reviewed the Sandclean product earlier this year at Fork &amp; Bottle: &lt;a href="http://www.forkandbottle.com/shopping/internetshop/korin0106.htm%3C/p" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.forkandbottle.com/shopping/internets...&lt;/a&gt;&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Note: They almost work too well; you have to use them gently or they may scratch whatever you're cleaning more than your want. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 11:07:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Recovering from Thanksgiving: Cookbook Choices</title><link>http://treehuggercomments.disqus.com/recovering_from_thanksgiving_cookbook_choices/#comment-17488790</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry, but "cooking light" cookbooks get my Big Thumbs Down. I believe cooking with quality ingredients like real butter, milk and cream that's not ultra-pasteurized, meat from good sources (non-industrial), etc., etc.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Meat without fat has little taste. You eat too much because, yep, it has too little taste - unsatisfying ... and so you over-salt/sweeten it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Stop fearing fat! And also serve lots of vegetables, esp. from local farms. (Rant ends.)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 17:02:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pocket Guide to Good Fish Choices</title><link>http://treehuggercomments.disqus.com/pocket_guide_to_good_fish_choices/#comment-17489173</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm much more inclined to trust the &lt;a href="http://www.montereybayaquarium.com/cr/seafoodwatch.asp" rel="nofollow"&gt; Monterey Bay Aquarium's SeaFood Watch cards/website instead.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br  /&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 03:10:25 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>