<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Stephen Manzi</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/f60d9687195aa906245582a2ef65ff50/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 20:24:16 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Live and Animated Shorts</title><link>http://newcritics.disqus.com/live_and_animated_shorts/#comment-1373252</link><description>Claire, it's terrific that you gave these too-often overlooked categories the attention they deserve. I had an opportunity to see the animated shorts last weekend at the fab Jacob Burns Theater in Pleasantville, NY. I agree that "The Danish Poet" was the best of the bunch. "Maestro" was fun, but an obvious one-joke. "Match Girl" was too blatantly sentimental..."Cobble Hill" too long..."Nuts" an ad for Ice Age 14...but the "Poet" was wistful, whimsical, and beautiful.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stephen Manzi</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 13:37:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Live Blogging the 2007 Oscars.  Action!</title><link>http://newcritics.disqus.com/live_blogging_the_2007_oscars_action/#comment-1373377</link><description>This opening sequence is intolerable. I stopped watching Disc Two of Season Three of "Taxi" for this?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stephen Manzi</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 20:35:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Reason to Go On Living: That Chord</title><link>http://newcritics.disqus.com/a_reason_to_go_on_living_that_chord/#comment-1374597</link><description>Everything in music can be classified as BC (before THE chord) or AC. It was a clarion wake-up call to an entire generation of musicians.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Neddie, man, where do you live? Can I come over and look at (maybe touch...play, even?) the axe before it goes back to your lunatic (how could let it out his possession?) friend?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stephen Manzi</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 22:07:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Live Blogging Mad Men: &amp;#8220;And you, sir, are no John Galt&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://newcritics.disqus.com/live_blogging_mad_men_8220and_you_sir_are_no_john_galt8221/#comment-1379669</link><description>What are the odds they put a twist on it and Nixon wins?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stephen Manzi</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 22:09:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Live Blogging Mad Men: &amp;#8220;And you, sir, are no John Galt&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://newcritics.disqus.com/live_blogging_mad_men_8220and_you_sir_are_no_john_galt8221/#comment-1379671</link><description>He DOES look like Orson Welles</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stephen Manzi</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 22:17:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Live Blogging Mad Men: &amp;#8220;And you, sir, are no John Galt&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://newcritics.disqus.com/live_blogging_mad_men_8220and_you_sir_are_no_john_galt8221/#comment-1379677</link><description>Well, so much for my alternate universe-Nixon wins '60 election scenario...was thinking this might be alternate universe where the life forms - while looking human - are really unemoting androids.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stephen Manzi</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 22:26:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Live Blogging Mad Men: &amp;#8220;And you, sir, are no John Galt&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://newcritics.disqus.com/live_blogging_mad_men_8220and_you_sir_are_no_john_galt8221/#comment-1379684</link><description>Hey - it's Hawkeye!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stephen Manzi</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 22:31:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Live Blogging Mad Men: &amp;#8220;And you, sir, are no John Galt&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://newcritics.disqus.com/live_blogging_mad_men_8220and_you_sir_are_no_john_galt8221/#comment-1379685</link><description>Bite me, Tom.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stephen Manzi</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 22:32:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Live Blogging Mad Men: &amp;#8220;And you, sir, are no John Galt&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://newcritics.disqus.com/live_blogging_mad_men_8220and_you_sir_are_no_john_galt8221/#comment-1379686</link><description>What a wimpy jerk. Sheesh.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stephen Manzi</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 22:35:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Live Blogging Mad Men: &amp;#8220;And you, sir, are no John Galt&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://newcritics.disqus.com/live_blogging_mad_men_8220and_you_sir_are_no_john_galt8221/#comment-1379691</link><description>Ah, Tom, but aren't we all? And isn't that the point of this subtle masterpiece of tv?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stephen Manzi</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 22:37:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Live Blogging Mad Men: &amp;#8220;And you, sir, are no John Galt&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://newcritics.disqus.com/live_blogging_mad_men_8220and_you_sir_are_no_john_galt8221/#comment-1379695</link><description>Indeed. Who cares?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stephen Manzi</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 22:48:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Live-Blogging Mad Men: the Final Chapter</title><link>http://newcritics.disqus.com/live_blogging_mad_men_the_final_chapter/#comment-1379873</link><description>Finally got around to viewing the final episode (strangely, was at the 2007 installment of the very Al Smith Dinner that Tom led his post with...). In any case, apart from the unnecessary melodrama of the unnoticed pregnancy (heh-heh - Pete's got got a l'il whore-child of his own, now!), I thought it was the strongest episode yet - certainly the best ending. Any male viewer who's been married more than a coupla years had to get a little misty watching Don's slide show...I did, anyway.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;M.A. and Tom - thanks for leading us through the season. I'll be back next year if you are.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stephen Manzi</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 20:24:16 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>