<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Marios Alexandrou</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/f6033ff888b151d8190dbc047fe01b1e/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 20:00:19 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: 7 SEO Techniques That Google Smashed in 2007</title><link>http://copybrighter.disqus.com/7_seo_techniques_that_google_smashed_in_2007/#comment-21674444</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm not sure I get what you're trying to say with item 7. In particular, what do you mean by "10 identical search results"?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;There are some who would disagree with item 1. They would argue that reciprocal links can still work when done "correctly" e.g. where the sites are related. I think what hit the real estate folks (and others) was the indiscriminate use of reciprocal links between sites regardless of topic.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marios Alexandrou</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 15:27:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Real or Fake PageRank Update In Progress (round 3)</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/real_or_fake_pagerank_update_in_progress_round_3_60/#comment-10991969</link><description>Similar to Adam (several comments prior to this one), my site (old site, but new domain) has moved from a PR 0 to a PR 3. Seems like a real toolbar update and if I recall correctly this is just the second update this year making it overdue, no?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marios Alexandrou</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 21:30:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Real or Fake PageRank Update In Progress (round 3)</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/real_or_fake_pagerank_update_in_progress_round_3_60/#comment-12526414</link><description>Similar to Adam (several comments prior to this one), my site (old site, but new domain) has moved from a PR 0 to a PR 3. Seems like a real toolbar update and if I recall correctly this is just the second update this year making it overdue, no?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marios Alexandrou</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 21:30:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Sitelinks On A PR4 1 Year Old Domain</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/google_sitelinks_on_a_pr4_1_year_old_domain_63/#comment-10992208</link><description>Sitelinks for PR5 sites is actually quite common. I just checked three past client sites that are PR 5 and two of them continue to have sitelinks. However, like you, I've never seen them on a PR4 site before. Kudos!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marios Alexandrou</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 16:26:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Sitelinks On A PR4 1 Year Old Domain</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/google_sitelinks_on_a_pr4_1_year_old_domain_63/#comment-12526633</link><description>Sitelinks for PR5 sites is actually quite common. I just checked three past client sites that are PR 5 and two of them continue to have sitelinks. However, like you, I've never seen them on a PR4 site before. Kudos!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marios Alexandrou</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 16:26:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Sitelinks On A PR4 1 Year Old Domain</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/google_sitelinks_on_a_pr4_1_year_old_domain_63/#comment-10992209</link><description>Sorry for the double post, I couldn't resist. It took me jsut 5 minutes to find another PR4 site with sitelinks. Maybe it isn't that uncommon after all? This time it's a  real estate site with a state-level focus. However, the domain is pretty old so I still think hitting the sitelinks level in 1 year is worth noting.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marios Alexandrou</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 16:32:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Sitelinks On A PR4 1 Year Old Domain</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/google_sitelinks_on_a_pr4_1_year_old_domain_63/#comment-12526634</link><description>Sorry for the double post, I couldn't resist. It took me jsut 5 minutes to find another PR4 site with sitelinks. Maybe it isn't that uncommon after all? This time it's a  real estate site with a state-level focus. However, the domain is pretty old so I still think hitting the sitelinks level in 1 year is worth noting.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marios Alexandrou</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 16:32:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PageRank Is The Primary Google Search Ranking Factor</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/pagerank_is_the_primary_google_search_ranking_factor_51/#comment-10993161</link><description>I think I get what you're trying to say Andy, but my own experience doesn't match up with your conclusions. I've got a PR 1 site (admittedly toolbar PR) that has just under 900 pages indexed which works out to nearly 100% of the pages. I've done nothing but on-page SEO. It would seem that if PR is the primary factor, that the site wouldn't be doing so well.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However, I do consider PR to be an important factor and I generally disagree with the folks that write it's not worth paying attention to. I figure SEOs should look at any data that Google provides and decide what to do with that information on a case-by-case basis rather than dismiss it outright.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marios Alexandrou</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 20:00:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PageRank Is The Primary Google Search Ranking Factor</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/pagerank_is_the_primary_google_search_ranking_factor_51/#comment-12527573</link><description>I think I get what you're trying to say Andy, but my own experience doesn't match up with your conclusions. I've got a PR 1 site (admittedly toolbar PR) that has just under 900 pages indexed which works out to nearly 100% of the pages. I've done nothing but on-page SEO. It would seem that if PR is the primary factor, that the site wouldn't be doing so well.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However, I do consider PR to be an important factor and I generally disagree with the folks that write it's not worth paying attention to. I figure SEOs should look at any data that Google provides and decide what to do with that information on a case-by-case basis rather than dismiss it outright.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marios Alexandrou</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 20:00:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wordpress PlugIn: SphinnIt Button</title><link>http://michellemacphearson.disqus.com/wordpress_plugin_sphinnit_button/#comment-13891339</link><description>Thanks for the plugin! It got me 99% of where I wanted to be.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For those still interested in having the Sphinn button show only after receiving a Sphinn, I've described a WordPress theme modification that accomplishes just that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.allthingssem.com/sphinn-button-after-first-sphinn/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.allthingssem.com/sphinn-button-after...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marios Alexandrou</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 09:51:31 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>