Hello!
The comments on this profile are unclaimed and thus are unverified.
Do they belong to you? Claim these comments.
Marios Alexandrou
Is this you? Claim Profile »
1 year ago
in PageRank Is The Primary Google Search Ranking Factor on Andy Beard - Internet Business Systems Discussion
I think I get what you're trying to say Andy, but my own experience doesn't match up with your conclusions. I've got a PR 1 site (admittedly toolbar PR) that has just under 900 pages indexed which works out to nearly 100% of the pages. I've done nothing but on-page SEO. It would seem that if PR is the primary factor, that the site wouldn't be doing so well.
However, I do consider PR to be an important factor and I generally disagree with the folks that write it's not worth paying attention to. I figure SEOs should look at any data that Google provides and decide what to do with that information on a case-by-case basis rather than dismiss it outright.
However, I do consider PR to be an important factor and I generally disagree with the folks that write it's not worth paying attention to. I figure SEOs should look at any data that Google provides and decide what to do with that information on a case-by-case basis rather than dismiss it outright.
1 reply
1 year ago
in PageRank Is The Primary Google Search Ranking Factor on Andy Beard - Internet Business Systems Discussion
I think I get what you're trying to say Andy, but my own experience doesn't match up with your conclusions. I've got a PR 1 site (admittedly toolbar PR) that has just under 900 pages indexed which works out to nearly 100% of the pages. I've done nothing but on-page SEO. It would seem that if PR is the primary factor, that the site wouldn't be doing so well.
However, I do consider PR to be an important factor and I generally disagree with the folks that write it's not worth paying attention to. I figure SEOs should look at any data that Google provides and decide what to do with that information on a case-by-case basis rather than dismiss it outright.
However, I do consider PR to be an important factor and I generally disagree with the folks that write it's not worth paying attention to. I figure SEOs should look at any data that Google provides and decide what to do with that information on a case-by-case basis rather than dismiss it outright.
1 reply
Andy Beard
Marios I have sites like that as well and have experimented with all kinds of sites.
It doesn't take a lot of juice to get pages in the index, but it does take a good linking structure if you don't have a lot of juice.
A typical good linking structure for low juice sites is to force a spider from the home page to go only to the sitemap, and then from the individual pages link only to the home page - what I have discussed before as a "spider circle"
The technique doesn't require using nofollow, but using nofollow does allow you to add additional human navigation that might reduce the amount of juice that flows to the sitemap.
It doesn't take a lot of juice to get pages in the index, but it does take a good linking structure if you don't have a lot of juice.
A typical good linking structure for low juice sites is to force a spider from the home page to go only to the sitemap, and then from the individual pages link only to the home page - what I have discussed before as a "spider circle"
The technique doesn't require using nofollow, but using nofollow does allow you to add additional human navigation that might reduce the amount of juice that flows to the sitemap.
It doesn't take a lot of juice to get pages in the index, but it does take a good linking structure if you don't have a lot of juice.
A typical good linking structure for low juice sites is to force a spider from the home page to go only to the sitemap, and then from the individual pages link only to the home page - what I have discussed before as a "spider circle"
The technique doesn't require using nofollow, but using nofollow does allow you to add additional human navigation that might reduce the amount of juice that flows to the sitemap.