<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for skepticlawyer</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/f57601d763e82db90007fd31be537fa5/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 12:47:49 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Positively Heretical?</title><link>http://willwilkinson.disqus.com/positively_heretical/#comment-3713389</link><description>I've tried to tease out Sen's capabilities account and it's possibilities for 'progressive fusionism' in a bit more detail &lt;a href="http://skepticlawyer.com.au/2008/05/so-what-does-progressive-fusionism-look-like/" rel="nofollow"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. It builds on Prof Cowen's comments, as well as some commentary by Don Arthur over at Club Troppo.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">skepticlawyer</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 12:46:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Positively Heretical?</title><link>http://willwilkinson.disqus.com/positively_heretical/#comment-3713390</link><description>And next time I should remember that possessive its has no apostrophe.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A clear case of examinationitis, I think.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">skepticlawyer</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 12:47:49 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>