<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Arthur</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/f496dbdaa1c9cd3adee8d6cb2f4e1f3b/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 18:09:12 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Firefox 3: Color profile support (oh the pretty, pretty colors)</title><link>http://dria.disqus.com/firefox_3_color_profile_support_oh_the_pretty_pretty_colors/#comment-1568076</link><description>Hm, the color profile is for the whole screen, isn't it? and when you print something you use the printer's profile. So why is it the responsibility of every application to adapt its output to the screen and not the responsibility of whatever is driving the screen (e.g. X on Linux)? Probably I've somehow misunderstood how color profiles work, but I thought you go from input device -&amp;gt; input device profile -&amp;gt; "canonical" representation -&amp;gt; output device profile -&amp;gt; output device. So why would applications ever handle anything else than the "canonical" representation?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arthur</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 18:09:12 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>