Do they belong to you? Claim these comments.
Unregistered
aliases
- Johnny Appleseed
- johnny appleseed
- Zoe
- Pam
- zoe
Johnny Appleseed
Is this you? Claim Profile »
7 months ago
in Apple Investors Working From the Dregs on Investor in the Wilderness
lead where? off a cliff?
7 months ago
in Apple Investors Working From the Dregs on Investor in the Wilderness
it really doesn't matter if big money catches andy's work, big money isn't buying or selling on fundamentals right now, big money is selling everything under the sun into strength. it's a self fulfilling prophecy, the markets are going much lower because big money wants them to. Wall street is childish, if they're hurting, every american MUST hurt with them, it's all a game played by childish egotistical maniacs. it's not a place to invest your money anymore, it's a place to gamble-double etf's, not risky enough for you? how about triple eft's?
8 months ago
in Apple Investors Nix the VIX on Investor in the Wilderness
another flip flop...
it wasn't but two months ago you were bad mouthing the company for quality issues...basically stating it was the beginning of the end for them and their "brand" of high end, reliable, premium, products...
it wasn't but two months ago you were bad mouthing the company for quality issues...basically stating it was the beginning of the end for them and their "brand" of high end, reliable, premium, products...
1 reply
8 months ago
in Apple and Markets Too Hot to Handle on Investor in the Wilderness
i dunno, maybe just short covering rallies at days end?
I'm minting money buying puts and shorting stocks on every bounce and then covering by days end. no reason to hold anything more than a day in tis market.
I'm minting money buying puts and shorting stocks on every bounce and then covering by days end. no reason to hold anything more than a day in tis market.
1 reply
Zach Bass
This coming week, the week of Nov 10, 2008, will present a crossroads for Apple and the markets. If we have a strong sustained rally, I see us averting disaster. But we would need to recapture the 200 day moving averages to do that. A very tall order indeed.
8 months ago
in Apple Earnings Strategies on Investor in the Wilderness
Zach,
wtf are you talking about here?
"Besides the earnings report, there’s a wild-card metric that investors will be tuned into, and that’s the number of iPhones Apple has sold so far this year. So, if you haven’t been living under a rock then you know that number is 10 million. The consensus estimate is 4 million units at the end of Q3. That would mean Apple would have to sell 6 million 3G iPhones to meet their own guidance."
first off, this is q4 they are reporting, not q3.
second, the "10 million number" included first generation phones and was apples projection, according to some, for the calendar year 2008. At a minimum, if it was for fiscal 2008, they would not have to sell 6 million to meet their own guidance, they sold plenty of edge phones to support these numbers, not just 3g. So how you arrive at 4 million/6miion is beyond me.
And you are an authority on apple? You don't even know what quarter it is.....maybe you should re-read the mumbo jumbo up top and clarify what you are trying to say.
wtf are you talking about here?
"Besides the earnings report, there’s a wild-card metric that investors will be tuned into, and that’s the number of iPhones Apple has sold so far this year. So, if you haven’t been living under a rock then you know that number is 10 million. The consensus estimate is 4 million units at the end of Q3. That would mean Apple would have to sell 6 million 3G iPhones to meet their own guidance."
first off, this is q4 they are reporting, not q3.
second, the "10 million number" included first generation phones and was apples projection, according to some, for the calendar year 2008. At a minimum, if it was for fiscal 2008, they would not have to sell 6 million to meet their own guidance, they sold plenty of edge phones to support these numbers, not just 3g. So how you arrive at 4 million/6miion is beyond me.
And you are an authority on apple? You don't even know what quarter it is.....maybe you should re-read the mumbo jumbo up top and clarify what you are trying to say.
9 months ago
in Apple Investors Forget the Bailout, Just Bail Now on Investor in the Wilderness
sure it is, go back and read your blog posts as well as your apple echosphere posts...sometimes you say two different thngs the same day....like investing, you hedge.
on aug 11th you called "the bull is back" and then numerous bottom calls after that.....you don't know whether you are coming or going sometimes, Zach--you just love to hear yourself talk. You's make a great lawyer, you can talk your way out of a paper bag. Most see through this though, regardless of what your "visitor" numbers say--your blog and board is basically defunct. How many people aswered your rate cut poll? 6?
on aug 11th you called "the bull is back" and then numerous bottom calls after that.....you don't know whether you are coming or going sometimes, Zach--you just love to hear yourself talk. You's make a great lawyer, you can talk your way out of a paper bag. Most see through this though, regardless of what your "visitor" numbers say--your blog and board is basically defunct. How many people aswered your rate cut poll? 6?
9 months ago
in Apple Investors Forget the Bailout, Just Bail Now on Investor in the Wilderness
zach is an expert on bottoms, he's called at least 4 this past summer that never materialized, as well as an end to the bar market, as well as....as well as...
zach just likes to hear himself talk--so now he'll pile on the panic train.
zach just likes to hear himself talk--so now he'll pile on the panic train.
1 reply
Zach Bass
Pam, that's really not true at all. I did say that I thought 1200 was a bottom on the S&P about 3 days after we had hit that level. And I did so on sound TA principles, but I have not called any other bottom.
Please don't mistake analysis of potential outcomes with calling a level. I very rarely if ever call bottoms unless I think there is substantial evidence to do so. In hindsight the 1200 level was obviously not a bottom, just a temporary landing.
And If I'm pushing the panic button, it's because the near-term future doesn't look promising. The fact is that the markets still believe stocks are over-priced in this environment. So that can only mean one thing, further declines. If you choose not to recognize that, well that's your prerogative.
Please don't mistake analysis of potential outcomes with calling a level. I very rarely if ever call bottoms unless I think there is substantial evidence to do so. In hindsight the 1200 level was obviously not a bottom, just a temporary landing.
And If I'm pushing the panic button, it's because the near-term future doesn't look promising. The fact is that the markets still believe stocks are over-priced in this environment. So that can only mean one thing, further declines. If you choose not to recognize that, well that's your prerogative.
1 year ago
in Everyone and their mother now shorting SOHU! on Beanieville
yeah, but beanie, rbs called for a meltdown later this summer after a rise through July...so this wouldn't be the meltdown they refer
1 year ago
in Banks need to raise 143 billion from bond insurer downgrades on Beanieville
welcome to last week, sunfun...the story has ben posted 1,000 times nd has already been changed by Sacconaghi..
1 year ago
in A Brutal Week For the Bulls on Beanieville
Last week the bears over did it and signaled exhaustion. Just look at the weekly chart and you can see the potential significance of a 2300 bottom. Fundamentals stink and that H/S pattern looks ugly, however the chart says the bulls are gonna give it a go never the less. Risk/reward suggests the bears need to think about moving aside for now.......
- 0 points
- Jump to »
1 year ago
in Short WYNN definately under 95! on Beanieville
I keep hearing all this crap about the $vix and ne fear in the market.....lol..
There are other fear measures besides $vix. Case in point:
there is 1 new high today in the nyse. and a whopping 4 in the nasdaq. I have never seen these numbers this low ever. Throw in crazy high CPC and TRIN ma's, and super-high new lows.
Oh and 5 out of 6 nasdaq stocks are below their 200 MA; 4 out of 5 in the NYSE. Seems there are sufficient markers to indicate fear.
Puuuleease.
There are other fear measures besides $vix. Case in point:
there is 1 new high today in the nyse. and a whopping 4 in the nasdaq. I have never seen these numbers this low ever. Throw in crazy high CPC and TRIN ma's, and super-high new lows.
Oh and 5 out of 6 nasdaq stocks are below their 200 MA; 4 out of 5 in the NYSE. Seems there are sufficient markers to indicate fear.
Puuuleease.
- 2 points
- Jump to »
fortune8
You are absolutely correct.
VIX just happens to be my favorite indicator.
So far VIX has not made a top.
How many incorrect attempts have there been in calling the market bottom?
Eventually someone will get it right because the probably that everyone is 100% wrong is 0%.
Actually, the above is not an accurate statement because 100% can also be wrong.
VIX just happens to be my favorite indicator.
So far VIX has not made a top.
How many incorrect attempts have there been in calling the market bottom?
Eventually someone will get it right because the probably that everyone is 100% wrong is 0%.
Actually, the above is not an accurate statement because 100% can also be wrong.
1 year ago
in Short WYNN definately under 95! on Beanieville
I hear ya, the dreaded afternoon selloff...almost like cloackwork.
1 year ago
in Short WYNN definately under 95! on Beanieville
Based on what? Your gut? oex? the fact that we plummet every afternoon??lol
read my post wayyyy down below.
read my post wayyyy down below.
- 2 points
- Jump to »
jarred
good post wayyyy down below.
my comment was based on the day's action - up big off huge futures, then dwindles leading up to W's stimulus pep talk, and then starts dropping, and can't seem to establish any sort of "footing". we'll see. after yesterday, i thought there would be a huge rally today with bargain hunters and short covering, but so far, those people don't outnumber the sellers and the shorts aren't covering.
my comment was based on the day's action - up big off huge futures, then dwindles leading up to W's stimulus pep talk, and then starts dropping, and can't seem to establish any sort of "footing". we'll see. after yesterday, i thought there would be a huge rally today with bargain hunters and short covering, but so far, those people don't outnumber the sellers and the shorts aren't covering.
1 year ago
in Short WYNN definately under 95! on Beanieville
Yeah, I know it's close and yeah I know nothing with the market is ever in stone. But the chart is telling us that we are going to get a trend changing bottom just below yesterday's lows......2300 makes for a reasonable target for the reversal print.
The wkly 200ma is the bulls last stand and apparently they're gonna take it. Theoretically the reversal off this bear exhaustion signal will be able to take us to new highs.
we shall see.......first we bounce, then we diverge, and then we reverse trend. Of course there is the question of will a bottom stick but I'm thinking it probably will. fwiw - 2850 per the system is not viewed as THE TOP of the BULL. If that holds then so will this coming bottom.
So if I haven't sold yet, now is not the time.........I'd wait for the bottom, then wait for the upside acid test that is sure to take place about 2600. If the bears failed at that point to derail the bulls, then your good to go. I suppose yesterday's telling signal shouldn't be too much of a surprise regardless of the outcome. Afterall, we are still in a BULL market till we're not anymore........lol
Personally, I'll keep my bear suit on till we diverge below yesterday's low but you can bet once we do I switch from bear to bull on this market. See my diatribe in yesterday's thread with solar fun
The wkly 200ma is the bulls last stand and apparently they're gonna take it. Theoretically the reversal off this bear exhaustion signal will be able to take us to new highs.
we shall see.......first we bounce, then we diverge, and then we reverse trend. Of course there is the question of will a bottom stick but I'm thinking it probably will. fwiw - 2850 per the system is not viewed as THE TOP of the BULL. If that holds then so will this coming bottom.
So if I haven't sold yet, now is not the time.........I'd wait for the bottom, then wait for the upside acid test that is sure to take place about 2600. If the bears failed at that point to derail the bulls, then your good to go. I suppose yesterday's telling signal shouldn't be too much of a surprise regardless of the outcome. Afterall, we are still in a BULL market till we're not anymore........lol
Personally, I'll keep my bear suit on till we diverge below yesterday's low but you can bet once we do I switch from bear to bull on this market. See my diatribe in yesterday's thread with solar fun
1 year ago
in MON, you don't look so hot. on Beanieville
well, I give you three scenarios and I say you gotta respect the bear until we see otherwise, part one of that otherwise was today...you? a nice even 2,00o 0n the naz with no explanation...and you're laughing at me??
1 year ago
in MON, you don't look so hot. on Beanieville
lol..at what?
I look at the weekly's...and today to me signals bear exhaustion...doessn't mean it's the bottom, we may gap down or trade down at some point, but my system tells me today was exhaustive, now I look for divergance, what would you call bear exhaustion, a 300 point UP day??lol..
vix is also telling...
I look at the weekly's...and today to me signals bear exhaustion...doessn't mean it's the bottom, we may gap down or trade down at some point, but my system tells me today was exhaustive, now I look for divergance, what would you call bear exhaustion, a 300 point UP day??lol..
vix is also telling...
- 2 points
- Jump to »
1 year ago
in MON, you don't look so hot. on Beanieville
My take on th mareket for what it's worth:
* 2350 +/- ........... soft landing scenario with the wkly 200 ma as support.
* 2100 +/- ........... system target.
* 1925 ............... H/S target.
Take your pick. Scenario # 1 retains the 3100 + target to the upside...... Scenario # 3 would clean up all " bad behavior " anomalies. Scenario # 2 is a basic guideline target at this point. Ultimately we have to watch and see what happens where, so till then one has to respect the bear view till we get some kind of a bottom.
earlier this week, I felt that if we continue down from 2400, the bears will almost certainly exhaust themselves and we could see a trend changing reversal print of 2300 or so, although it would take a couple weeks to play out..........while not the most probable scenario I reccomend not to fully discount it. If we moved up from there, the indicators can reset and with over head resistance sitting betwix 2580 - 2600, we would be presented with an excellent opportunity to sell this market..................this scenario favors the BEAR and all but eliminates a 2300 bottom.
* so the question is : BEAR or no BEAR ?...........guess we'll find out soon enough, becasue today we saw bear exhaustion..........if today or tommorrow's low gives way to a bounce, then we look for divergence.
* exhaustion + divergence = reversal
and ultimately, today's TA is indicating the "soft-landing" scenario lives...
K.I.S.S.
Go apple, eveyone use GWB'S rebate to buy a mac air or iphone, my wife can't live w/o hers and now ALL the yenta's want one..lol..
Beanie, you still in palo Alto? I have family in Palo Alto, Los Altos and Burlingame.
* 2350 +/- ........... soft landing scenario with the wkly 200 ma as support.
* 2100 +/- ........... system target.
* 1925 ............... H/S target.
Take your pick. Scenario # 1 retains the 3100 + target to the upside...... Scenario # 3 would clean up all " bad behavior " anomalies. Scenario # 2 is a basic guideline target at this point. Ultimately we have to watch and see what happens where, so till then one has to respect the bear view till we get some kind of a bottom.
earlier this week, I felt that if we continue down from 2400, the bears will almost certainly exhaust themselves and we could see a trend changing reversal print of 2300 or so, although it would take a couple weeks to play out..........while not the most probable scenario I reccomend not to fully discount it. If we moved up from there, the indicators can reset and with over head resistance sitting betwix 2580 - 2600, we would be presented with an excellent opportunity to sell this market..................this scenario favors the BEAR and all but eliminates a 2300 bottom.
* so the question is : BEAR or no BEAR ?...........guess we'll find out soon enough, becasue today we saw bear exhaustion..........if today or tommorrow's low gives way to a bounce, then we look for divergence.
* exhaustion + divergence = reversal
and ultimately, today's TA is indicating the "soft-landing" scenario lives...
K.I.S.S.
Go apple, eveyone use GWB'S rebate to buy a mac air or iphone, my wife can't live w/o hers and now ALL the yenta's want one..lol..
Beanie, you still in palo Alto? I have family in Palo Alto, Los Altos and Burlingame.
- 2 points
- Jump to »
SolarFan
lol, last hour dropped 300+ points, how can you say bear exhaustion?
1 year ago
in The bottom? on Beanieville
first and foremost......we are in a downtrend and nasdaq 2100+/- is a reasonably expected target at this time. The chart says to be a bear till it doesn't anymore. I was merely outlining the possibilities for bigger picture implications, based on any strong moves during next week's OE.
In a technical nut shell, if the bears get greedy and tank us next week, they exhaust and we soon get a bottom that could/should take us to new highs. On the flip side, a continued bounce and chances are we get no bottom at 2350+/-.
That said, a bigger picture fade off any good move next week is the basic outline. Up and the BEAR continues while down and the BEAR gets cut short. Let's see what happens.
Beanie, thanks for supporting my apple stock..lol...buy TWO, it's not the earnings Im worried about, it's the forward guidance!!
In a technical nut shell, if the bears get greedy and tank us next week, they exhaust and we soon get a bottom that could/should take us to new highs. On the flip side, a continued bounce and chances are we get no bottom at 2350+/-.
That said, a bigger picture fade off any good move next week is the basic outline. Up and the BEAR continues while down and the BEAR gets cut short. Let's see what happens.
Beanie, thanks for supporting my apple stock..lol...buy TWO, it's not the earnings Im worried about, it's the forward guidance!!
1 year ago
in We closed negatively 8 consecutive days!!!! on Beanieville
anyone hava an idea how low apple's going?
my account is down to 117k from 210, I can't afford much more pain...
my account is down to 117k from 210, I can't afford much more pain...
- 3 points
- Jump to »
ederman
Johnny, you are fighting the trend my friend, as long as you continue to do so and try and pick bottoms you will continue to lose money, go with the trend. I think this downtrend is not going away soon. we may have mini rallies here and there but the main trend is down
1 year ago
in N will not and cannot stay down. on Beanieville
CSIQ going to $30??
- 2 points
- Jump to »

I this case, I erred in expecting an $800 notebook from Apple, I realize that would be taking away from what makes them great, so I corrected my self. Don't you ever correct your self, or are you always right?