<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Dallas</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/f2ded2a00ab320a5f5b44c092cbe1bb1/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 15:33:09 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Opposite Day</title><link>http://willwilkinson.disqus.com/opposite_day/#comment-3710184</link><description>There are &lt;i&gt;no&lt;/i&gt; objective moral truths.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dallas</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 07:58:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Putting More on the Table Brings People With More to the Table</title><link>http://willwilkinson.disqus.com/putting_more_on_the_table_brings_people_with_more_to_the_table/#comment-3710188</link><description>Will, &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am a little confused on who you're referring to when you say non-libertarian egalitarians. Are there libertarian egalitarians? Who are they?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In the Cato Unbound discussion, Schmidtz didn't seem to be an egalitarian--neither did Singer or Palmer. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Do you have any libertarian egalitarians in mind?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dallas</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 15:33:09 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>