<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for MG Siegler</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/f2189acf38966bc433312d42ae749afb/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 22:05:57 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Mashable&amp;#8217;s Open Web Awards begin</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/mashable8217s_open_web_awards_begin_76/#comment-20690</link><description>Thanks Mathew - yeah we're all taking nominations so stop on by and leave your favorites for each of the 13 categories in the comments to make sure they make to the next (voting) round.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MG Siegler</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 07:20:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wikia search: Let&amp;#8217;s give it a break</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/wikia_search_let8217s_give_it_a_break_43/#comment-63929</link><description>Agreed Mathew and thanks for rightly catching me mostly going against the grain on this one. If Wikia Search is going to be a success it's going to be the social/communal aspects of it and I don't see how you can deem a site a failure from day one when basically neither of those are in place - at all.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I had been worried about those social aspects after seeing the initial photos where were just a Facebook total rip-off died green, but after seeing they replaced that with a relatively simple and clean-looking social layer I'm a lot more optimistic. As you said, we'll see in 6 months.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MG Siegler</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 19:17:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ParisLemon was right to rip Window 7 Post</title><link>http://winextra.disqus.com/parislemon_was_right_to_rip_window_7_post/#comment-97544</link><description>I'm going to stick with writing my story on how OS X 10.9 is going to be the best OS X yet because of all Apple learned from the previous versions...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;:)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MG Siegler</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 01:39:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#8217;m on the road to fame and fortune</title><link>http://winextra.disqus.com/i8217m_on_the_road_to_fame_and_fortune/#comment-115793</link><description>You bet Steven, glad you're aboard.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It should probably be noted that I didn't ask Mark to join until a few hours after we taped the podcast, lest anyone thinks there was some conflict of interest (as if it really matter since no one is making anything from this).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MG Siegler</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:59:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#8217;m on the road to fame and fortune</title><link>http://winextra.disqus.com/i8217m_on_the_road_to_fame_and_fortune/#comment-115831</link><description>You do mean parislemonade right?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MG Siegler</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 23:17:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft - the 10,000 pound chicken with its head cut off</title><link>http://winextra.disqus.com/microsoft_the_10000_pound_chicken_with_its_head_cut_off/#comment-122999</link><description>Agreed about Ballmer, I think this could be the beginning of the end of his - his last hurrah.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MG Siegler</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 11:00:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Digg Town Hall: No &amp;#8220;secret moderators&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/digg_town_hall_no_8220secret_moderators8221/#comment-179751</link><description>Completely agree with the thought that cynics will remains cynics while fanboys will remain fanboys. Some attempts at straight-talk, some attempts skirting around issues. Status quo will remain status quo, but at least they are putting forth some effort now.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm turning into you, writing all over the place :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MG Siegler</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 08:38:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Movie Notes: Ocean&amp;#8217;s Twelve</title><link>http://webomatica.disqus.com/movie_notes_ocean8217s_twelve/#comment-308808</link><description>When I saw it in theaters I thought it was just much too smug, but I watched it again the other night (weird that you wrote on it), and I actually like it. It's not great, but I really like the European angle and think Pitt is particularly good in it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MG Siegler</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 17:10:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FriendFeed now flows both ways</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/friendfeed_now_flows_both_ways_04/#comment-261086</link><description>I think one of the keys - that you point out - is just how fast the roll out these fixes/new features. I am very impressed.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MG Siegler</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 02:45:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Elite Tech News Podcast #4</title><link>http://webomatica.disqus.com/elite_tech_news_podcast_4/#comment-340741</link><description>Ha. I love the fact that you know EXACTLY what I was doing from Twitter/FriendFeed! Seems like you guys got along just fine without me :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MG Siegler</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 03:28:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bitchmeme: Do blogs deserve advertising?</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/bitchmeme_do_blogs_deserve_advertising_00/#comment-353175</link><description>Louis - you should know as well as anyone that bitchmemes choose you, not the other way around ;)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MG Siegler</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 18:19:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Trolling for links: The top tech bloggers</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/trolling_for_links_the_top_tech_bloggers_73/#comment-358585</link><description>It looks like you've been saved Mathew. Henry isn't combining the multis because of whatever he is doing for CrunchBase with the list. I will stay at #34 and #38 and leave the pressure of being a top 10 to you :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MG Siegler</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 22:05:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Battlestar Galactica: Razor Movie Tonight</title><link>http://webomatica.disqus.com/battlestar_galactica_razor_movie_tonight/#comment-1753785</link><description>I must admit that I cheated a bit and watched it a couple weeks ago (I refuse to support SciFi now after the whole possibly playing the 2nd half of the final season in 2009) - overall it's solid and there are some very interesting things happening towards the end. Looking forward to your thoughts.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now the only question is when will Season 4 actually start?!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MG Siegler</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 23:18:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Battlestar Galactica: Razor</title><link>http://webomatica.disqus.com/battlestar_galactica_razor/#comment-1753787</link><description>At this point I *hope* we only have to wait until April - it could be a lot longer...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree on pretty much all points. That is a a very interesting idea about the little girl being Starbuck - obviously something about that ending will play into this season. You say Lee, but why not Bill being made into one after sticking his hand in there?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Your Cylon sex disease theory lives on...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MG Siegler</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 07:41:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Warning: How Not To Use Google Reader</title><link>http://webomatica.disqus.com/warning_how_not_to_use_google_reader/#comment-1753873</link><description>Ha ha, welcome to my world...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MG Siegler</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 19:33:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Some Favorite Blog Posts Of 2007&amp;#8230; On Other Blogs</title><link>http://webomatica.disqus.com/some_favorite_blog_posts_of_20078230_on_other_blogs/#comment-1753907</link><description>Glad someone reads my articles other than just my tech ones! I was particuarly fond of that article as well - though I should note, I recently rented Die Hard 4 (I refuse to call it that other name) and did actually like it (though I did watch the 'unrated' cut).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MG Siegler</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 20:32:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple To Announce Movie Rentals</title><link>http://webomatica.disqus.com/apple_to_announce_movie_rentals/#comment-1753932</link><description>It's great that Disney and Fox are on board, but I'm not liking the new rumors of varying prices between $2 - $5 for only a 24-hour period. I hope the older $2.99 for 30 days turns out to be true instead - think about taking rentals on a trip on the iPod or iPhone... 24-hour would be kind of lame.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MG Siegler</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 06:46:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MacWorld 2008: Subnotebook Rumor Revived</title><link>http://webomatica.disqus.com/macworld_2008_subnotebook_rumor_revived/#comment-1753936</link><description>Quite right I think with the point about the digital movie push - it would be in Apple's best interest to get people off of their DVD fix and on to digital. As for installing software, how often do you have to do that while on the go? If you're on the road you could just bring your portable optical drive with you or download the software as many programs now allow you to do.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I say no way that picture is for real, what on earth would you need a mouse button the size of a ruler for? :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MG Siegler</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 18:53:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: HD Format War: Warner Goes Blu-Ray</title><link>http://webomatica.disqus.com/hd_format_war_warner_goes_blu_ray/#comment-1753971</link><description>You and I both are hoping for this. Like Dave in the comment above I'm debating getting a PS3 because of the Warner/Blu-ray announcement, but would MUCH rather get an Apple TV with a Blu-ray built-in.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MG Siegler</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 23:26:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MacWorld Apple Rumor Round Up: 1/6/08</title><link>http://webomatica.disqus.com/macworld_apple_rumor_round_up_1608/#comment-1753990</link><description>Excellent, 128 gigabytes! I think that is still pretty up in the air - how much storage Apple will want, I would guess 64 GB, but 128 GB at half the power consumption could be very enticing if it's not too expensive (which it may be)...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MG Siegler</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 04:47:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MacWorld Apple Rumor Round Up: 1/6/08</title><link>http://webomatica.disqus.com/macworld_apple_rumor_round_up_1608/#comment-1753992</link><description>Not sure I would see the point of that 'Mac Nano' with a solid-state drive, I don't think size has even been an issue with the Mac Mini/Apple TV - but price has been, and a solid state drive would make that thing very expensive.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MG Siegler</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:36:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Interesting: Apple TV (The Old Version)</title><link>http://webomatica.disqus.com/interesting_apple_tv_the_old_version/#comment-1754212</link><description>Yeah that'll be my plan as well it looks like, but with that being the case I don't see at all the point of getting a 160 gig Apple TV over a 40 gig one. I guess if you're having bad streaming performance?...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MG Siegler</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 04:02:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Interesting: Apple TV (The Old Version)</title><link>http://webomatica.disqus.com/interesting_apple_tv_the_old_version/#comment-1754214</link><description>Good to know, so you are able to JUST store movies on your apple tv without them existing on your computer? I think that is the only way I would get the 160 gig one and put all my ripped movies on there.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MG Siegler</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 03:26:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Interesting: Apple TV (The Old Version)</title><link>http://webomatica.disqus.com/interesting_apple_tv_the_old_version/#comment-1754217</link><description>Excellent. Appreciate all your help on this Jason.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MG Siegler</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 00:48:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Interesting: Apple TV (The Old Version)</title><link>http://webomatica.disqus.com/interesting_apple_tv_the_old_version/#comment-1754218</link><description>I'm definitely leaning towards getting one very soon as well. Did you get the 40 or 160 gig one? Can you just store movies on the Apple TV and not your computer or do they have to sync up - if so what's the point of the larger hard drive unless you plan on renting a lot of movies at once?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MG Siegler</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 07:09:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Movie Notes: MirrorMask</title><link>http://webomatica.disqus.com/movie_notes_mirrormask/#comment-1754227</link><description>While we mostly agree on all movies, I did like MirrorMask - the visuals never really wore off on me and I just thought it was pretty different and eerily haunting - yes kind of like Labyrinth, which I need to re-watch too by the way.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MG Siegler</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 04:03:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Battlestar Galactica: Good News on Season 4</title><link>http://webomatica.disqus.com/battlestar_galactica_good_news_on_season_4/#comment-1754372</link><description>Excellent...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MG Siegler</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 20:48:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Movie Notes: Once</title><link>http://webomatica.disqus.com/movie_notes_once/#comment-1754386</link><description>this was one of my favorite movies from last year.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MG Siegler</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 23:04:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple Cuts iPod Shuffle Price: New iPod Soon?</title><link>http://webomatica.disqus.com/apple_cuts_ipod_shuffle_price_new_ipod_soon/#comment-1754476</link><description>That is a nice dream - I just hope they have some new MacBook Pros for us finally!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MG Siegler</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 04:51:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Movie Notes: The Ghost And The Darkness</title><link>http://webomatica.disqus.com/movie_notes_the_ghost_and_the_darkness/#comment-1755149</link><description>I love that you're writing up all the apple movies of the week now - maybe you should make that a feature :) I haven't had a chance to watch the hours yet let alone the ghost and the darkness - must get apple TV, too much hassle to watch on my computer when i'm already sitting at it all day.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;by the way, to answer your question on ParisLemon - yes, I am now officially a full-time blogger/writer :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MG Siegler</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 18:24:51 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>