<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Anton Chuvakin</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/f1ce6b5a7fce3c3183c26d3d0f219ec0/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 01:05:25 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Who&amp;#8217;s Going to RSA?</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/who8217s_going_to_rsa/#comment-4357766</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I will be at RSA and at blogger meet-up....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anton Chuvakin</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:20:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why People Like Kurzweil Get it Wrong</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/why_people_like_kurzweil_get_it_wrong/#comment-4862661</link><description>Why do you say they fail? An AMAZING number of his are exactly right, which is in fact pretty surprising? I don&amp;#039;t get it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anton Chuvakin</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 01:04:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why People Like Kurzweil Get it Wrong</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/why_people_like_kurzweil_get_it_wrong/#comment-4862662</link><description>Actually, the sad fate of CSR is also pretty darn surprising. I wanted to try Dragon Nat Speaking software for years and finally somebody gave it to me as a gift as week. I was shocked how accurate it was!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anton Chuvakin</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 01:05:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Our Peabody-Award-Winning Game Show:</title><link>http://matasanochargen.disqus.com/our_peabody_award_winning_game_show/#comment-2319748</link><description>OMG, this is so funny: a Famous "Rag or Slick" Quote Contest :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anton Chuvakin</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 01:46:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: We Don&amp;#8217;t Suck Enough!</title><link>http://matasanochargen.disqus.com/we_don8217t_suck_enough/#comment-2319810</link><description>Very fun post!! I loved it</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anton Chuvakin</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2006 19:25:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Matasano Security Recommendation #001: Avoid Agents</title><link>http://matasanochargen.disqus.com/matasano_security_recommendation_001_avoid_agents/#comment-2321237</link><description>Hmm, how is it not obvious? Given a choice of achieving THE SAE without an agent or with an agent, who would say "yep, I wonna run another piece of vulnerable software on all of my X,000 servers and X0,000 workstations, etc..."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However, the sad truth is that sometimes you cannot do it without an agent or you can but you'd open a bigger-than-agent security hole in the process...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anton Chuvakin</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:16:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pro-Forma &amp;#8216;06 Punditry Results</title><link>http://matasanochargen.disqus.com/pro_forma_821606_punditry_results/#comment-2321337</link><description>Sorry, I have to snicker at the miserable failure of #4 prediction :-)  Just as I predicted.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"What’s taking you guys so long?"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Same as what I mentioned in our discussion thread: ongoing maintainance and log source support.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anton Chuvakin</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 14:12:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: An Indicator Of How Busy We Are Right Now:</title><link>http://matasanochargen.disqus.com/an_indicator_of_how_busy_we_are_right_now/#comment-2322758</link><description>Is it Solsoft "goodness" all over again?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anton Chuvakin</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 13:12:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Matasano&amp;#8217;s Playbook: Available Now!</title><link>http://matasanochargen.disqus.com/matasano8217s_playbook_available_now/#comment-2324216</link><description>Wow, this is cool ...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;gt;We just want to solve the core operational problems&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is this, like, the only way to go, which actually passes the common sense test? :-) Is this why this way is so unpopular?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Along the same line, there is got to be some GRC angle  with it, isn't there? :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anton Chuvakin</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 16:00:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who&amp;#8217;s Going to RSA?</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/who8217s_going_to_rsa/#comment-11179785</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I will be at RSA and at blogger meet-up....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anton Chuvakin</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:20:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why People Like Kurzweil Get it Wrong</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/why_people_like_kurzweil_get_it_wrong/#comment-11217466</link><description>Why do you say they fail? An AMAZING number of his are exactly right, which is in fact pretty surprising? I don&amp;#039;t get it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anton Chuvakin</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 01:04:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why People Like Kurzweil Get it Wrong</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/why_people_like_kurzweil_get_it_wrong/#comment-11217467</link><description>Actually, the sad fate of CSR is also pretty darn surprising. I wanted to try Dragon Nat Speaking software for years and finally somebody gave it to me as a gift as week. I was shocked how accurate it was!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anton Chuvakin</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 01:05:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Relational File System</title><link>http://thebiggertruth.disqus.com/the_relational_file_system/#comment-17064055</link><description>"ESG Research Director John McKnight tells me 40% of large company's average 1TB per month of security log data! "&lt;br&gt;Does this mean that 40% of all their data is logs?&lt;br&gt;------Not at all - these companies have PB's of data - it only means that security log data represents yet another unplanned use case that generates piles of data that has to be dealt with.  Cheers - Steve</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anton Chuvakin</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 13:26:36 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>