<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Rod Maingot</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/f0b35a1af473f9b11714f2e03232a484/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 02:54:34 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: on the size of government</title><link>http://beerdrinker.disqus.com/on_the_size_of_government/#comment-2580337</link><description>Regulation promotes competition? What kind of nonsense is this? Regulation is always a form of interference, that is simply the nature of regulation. A more plausible (but still wrong) argument would be that regulation interferes with competition to induce a positive outcome for one competitor, and a less positive outcome for another.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rod Maingot</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 07:37:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: on the size of government</title><link>http://beerdrinker.disqus.com/on_the_size_of_government/#comment-2580340</link><description>I would encourage you to read von Mises, Hayek, and Rand. They make a compelling argument that monopolies form in mixed economies in relative proportion to state interference - especially subsidies. As long as companies can lobby the government for more regulations and “safety controls” to raise barriers to entry, monopolies will exist.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rod Maingot</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 02:54:34 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>