<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for eriksr</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-edc30e7e" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/eriksr/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:11:31 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: When in a crisis, objectivity and speed are your friends</title><link>http://readyaimreach.com/2008/12/23/when-in-a-crisis-objectivity-and-speed-are-your-friends/#comment-4597151</link><description>You're darn' tootin'!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">eriksr</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:11:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When in a crisis, objectivity and speed are your friends</title><link>http://readyaimreach.com/2008/12/23/when-in-a-crisis-objectivity-and-speed-are-your-friends/#comment-4595729</link><description>Haven't read your link yet Julie, but just wanted to drop my thoughts quickly -- things happening over the weekend are nasty because, typically, the watchdogs are resting. So yes, social media HAS changed the way we manage and deal with crisis, and you've got to be vigilant. Unfortunately, that means working during the weekend.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Setting up Google news alerts, keyword searches in your RSS feeds, and just plain old snooping around are practically necessities now, sad to say, but will help minimize the amount of time you need to be on guard (when you should, by rights, be recuperating).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">eriksr</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 15:58:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TechCrunch taught me why sometimes bloggers are wrong</title><link>http://readyaimreach.com/2008/11/29/techcrunch-taught-me-why-sometimes-bloggers-are-wrong/#comment-4149983</link><description>Thanks for the considered response, Peter. You make a very valid point about the Foleo's capabilities. I must admit, I felt the same way towards Palm at the time. I don't entirely agree with your thought about the Foleo being the wrong product to enter the market with, though. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It is a poor product, no doubt, but it would put their foot in the door and be compared to smartphones more so than proper laptops. When netbooks started to ship and began kicking the Foleo's butt, Palm would have an opportunity to respond and so the market would unfold. Now the netbook market is commoditized and its not worth getting into unless you have an extensive chain built up to build things like this cheaply -- there's no hope of them getting into the game. They are stuck with Treo's, which PalmOS or WinMobile powered are basically outdated and outsexed by everyone else, and no one is buying PDAs anymore.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm afraid Palm will die a slow, painful death, now. I think I would have preferred that they gambled their future on a possibility, however weak, than go out this way.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">eriksr</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 12:33:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TechCrunch taught me why sometimes bloggers are wrong</title><link>http://readyaimreach.com/2008/11/29/techcrunch-taught-me-why-sometimes-bloggers-are-wrong/#comment-4076497</link><description>LOL. Nice story, I've never heard of the REDfly I'm sad to say. Looks like a&lt;br&gt;lovely device except for the whole Windows Mobile aspect.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Honestly, I'd really just like Palm to do well again. Pioneering a new&lt;br&gt;market -- painful lessons or not -- would have been a nice step for them and&lt;br&gt;cemented them as visionaries (I'm conveniently ignoring the fact that&lt;br&gt;Handspring was the visionary re: Treo...) :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">eriksr</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 17:57:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hey Look - This is an older video. On Graham’s last day of...</title><link>http://mel-o.tumblr.com/post/47489322#comment-1878802</link><description>Will wonders never cease!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">eriksr</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 18:08:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What&amp;rsquo;s Next for Impulse</title><link>http://www.theislanddog.com/2008/08/whats-next-for-impulse-2/#comment-1605363</link><description>God bless you guys for giving us such a sweet interface, really. I haven't tried Penny-Arcade's service yet, but this is waaaaay better than Steam and Gametap in my opinion.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">eriksr</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 18:02:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pitching in the clear: MicroPR</title><link>http://readyaimreach.com/2008/08/14/pitching-in-the-clear-micropr/#comment-1471199</link><description>On the question of HARO -- Twitter would certainly elicit a fast response...and would also cut down on the fluff PR professionals can't help but throw into their correspondence.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How often have you referred to your client's product as "best of breed"? Or "industry leader"? This is fluff. It carries absolutely no weight with reporters and only further reduces their attention span. the 140 character limit of Twitter will cut that down. In that regard, it's bloody brilliant!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So that's great. But the question remains -- if you had to pitch a new product to a reporter, how would you do it in 140 characters while not giving away information of value to competitors YET keep it interesting enough for the journo to respond?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">eriksr</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 11:07:33 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>