<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for ericflo</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-c728fc0e" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/ericflo/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 13:14:07 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Django Dose - Django Dose Callcast - Episode #10: 10/21/2009</title><link>http://djangodose.com/podcasts/callcast/episode/10/#comment-20715365</link><description>Actually Brian did do quite a bit of production/editing on this episode.  If you could let us know the specific places where you heard dead air, we will definitely aim to reduce those in the future.  It was a fairly difficult episode to coordinate and record with 8 people across the globe, but I think that Brian actually did a good job notwithstanding.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ericflo</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 13:14:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://djangodose.com/podcasts/callcast/episode/9/</title><link>http://djangodose.com/podcasts/callcast/episode/9/#comment-16279004</link><description>We're going to be importing the other callcasts from our previous site, &lt;a href="http://thisweekindjango.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;thisweekindjango.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ericflo</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:45:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Andy McKay's blog</title><link>http://www.agmweb.ca/blog/andy/2222/#comment-15958479</link><description>Wow, I do things very differently!  Surprising how we both use the same tool and have totally different ways of using it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ericflo</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 02:20:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where&amp;#8217;s the gang of 2,000 who controls tech hype hanging out today?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/08/22/tech-hype-gang/#comment-15243922</link><description>Nah, I don't think it'll escape the list.  It's fun, and I use it, but I think it's destined to remain niche.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ericflo</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 18:36:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Loses Search Market Share &amp;#8230; to Yahoo?!</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/15/google-loses-to-yahoo/#comment-14896327</link><description>I bet it had to do with Michael Jackson.  I'm serious...think about the demographics.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ericflo</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 22:20:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Alcides Fonseca:  Camelot, Django for the Desktop</title><link>http://wiki.alcidesfonseca.com/blog/camelot-django-desktop/#comment-14530617</link><description>SQLAlchemy really is a lot more powerful than Django's ORM, so I think it was a good choice.  It can also be made as easy to use.  (I'm a big Django advocate, but I doubt you'll find many who say SQLAlchemy isn't a superior ORM to Django's)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ericflo</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 21:11:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pirate outnumber buyers 3-1 on iPhone apps</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/05/11/pirate-outnumber-buyers-3-1-on-iphone-apps/#comment-9221878</link><description>This is just sad...the app is $.99.  I understand why someone might feel justified pirating a $3,000 piece of software, but nobody who owns an iPhone can say that they can't afford a 99 cent app.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It would really be interesting, though, to see how many people convert and actually purchase an item after having tried it out illegally.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ericflo</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 18:29:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Django Project Conventions</title><link>http://zvoase.tumblr.com/post/77349312#comment-6234711</link><description>I like the idea of having multiple different settings--one each for production, staging, and development.  I don't like the way you need to specify it via a text file, though.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The solution that I've used to do the same thing is this:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;FLAVOR = os.environ.get('FLAVOR', 'development')&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;if FLAVOR == 'development':&lt;br&gt;    from settings_overrides.development import *&lt;br&gt;elif FLAVOR == 'staging':&lt;br&gt;    from settings_overrides.staging import *&lt;br&gt;elif FLAVOR == 'production':&lt;br&gt;    from settings_overrides.production import *&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Actually my code doesn't quite look like that.  We use PyFlakes at work and it pukes on star imports, so there's some sludge to do essentially a star import without using that syntax.  The added benefit of that sludge is that it dynamically imports 'settings_overrides.' + FLAVOR.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The nice thing about this setup is that you don't have to change anything on-disk, just set a simple environment variable.  This way you can run, for example, (off of the same codebase and file path) both a staging and a development environment.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ericflo</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 04:08:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hyperlocal Websites will Boom in 2009 as Community Newspapers Fold</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/14219/hyperlocal-websites-will-boom-in-2009-as-community-newspapers-fold/#comment-4884885</link><description>What do you think about everyblock.com?  They seem to have really done it right.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ericflo</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 19:26:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Twitter *can't* be conversational for me (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/01/04/whyTwitterCantBeConversati.html#comment-4883352</link><description>This is so true.  I've been thinking about this a lot lately, actually.  In essence, people have turned Twitter into something it's not.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We need to build, from the ground up, what people *want* Twitter to be.  Nobody else has gotten this right.  In my opinion, the real innovation of Twitter is the unidirectional follow instead of the bidirectional friend relationship.  All the rest is just IRC.  If someone built an IRC-like service with some sort of standard API where everyone had their own personal "room" (feed) and they could choose whose messages went into that "room" (follows), and the reply metadata being annotated onto the stream (replies, etc.), then you could have a real killer service on your hands.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ericflo</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 16:53:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bandcamp</title><link>http://justindriscoll.us/2008/09/bandcamp.html#comment-4560034</link><description>This bandcamp.mu place is pretty ridiculously cool.  My brother just used it to launch his band's first album and as a user, the experience is very good. (BTW you can check the album out here &lt;a href="http://deltarasa.bandcamp.mu/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://deltarasa.bandcamp.mu/&lt;/a&gt;)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ericflo</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 15:42:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why I done joined Reddit</title><link>http://mrontemp.blogspot.com/2008/11/why-i-done-joined-reddit.html#comment-4247746</link><description>I think you'll like Reddit.  It's a pretty good community, and if you visit the right niches, it's got great content.  Thanks for the linkage!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ericflo</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 08:37:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2012 Movie teaser trailer</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/8137/2012-movie-teaser-trailer/#comment-3733979</link><description>Cool, thanks for posting.  By the way, I really like that your site doesn't have one specific focus.  Sometimes it's tech news, sometimes it's trailers, and other times it's celebrity gossip.  Ok well I could do without the celebrity gossip but you know what I mean :)  Keep up the good work!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ericflo</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 03:09:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: NoiseRiver Shuts Down After Developer Ditches FriendFeed</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/10/noiseriver-shuts-down-after-developer.html#comment-3337418</link><description>I do understand directeur's complaints, though.  Plenty of people follow me, but for whatever reason FriendFeed still seems like a one-way channel for communication.  The top participants post cool stuff, and I comment on it.  Sometimes someone will respond to me on one of their posts, but never do discussions start on my own items.  That being said, I do enjoy the things that the top participants post enough to keep going back :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ericflo</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 00:59:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Checking out VPSes (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/10/26/checkingOutVpses.html#comment-3308980</link><description>Ahh, sorry--in the case of Windows I have no insight :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ericflo</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 06:30:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Checking out VPSes (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/10/26/checkingOutVpses.html#comment-3308947</link><description>I've been using SliceHost for a while now, and been extremely satisfied with their service, reliability, and stability.  They've just been bought by Rackspace and so far I haven't noticed any difference, but that's something to be aware of.  I've also heard nothing but praise for Linode, but haven't had any personal experience with them.  Joyent always gets high praise as well, but they are OpenSolaris-based, which leads to some more difficult setup than some of the more standard Linux distributions.  I have a Joyent VPS and never was able to get everything set up properly with it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ericflo</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 06:18:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: William Shatner hates gay people&amp;#8230;well George Takei anyway</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/6050/william-shatner-hates-gay-peoplewell-george-takei-anyway/#comment-3248708</link><description>This article is ridiculous, headline-mongering nonsense.  You clearly haven't watched the video, and have taken his words completely out of context.  I usually enjoy inquisitr, but this article is just a mismatch from the video.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ericflo</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 06:06:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Just Wishing for Something to Go Mainstream Won't Make It So</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/09/just-wishing-for-something-to-go.html#comment-2517008</link><description>Yes, I certainly hope these things don't go mainstream.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ericflo</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 04:35:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter limiting followers to 2000 (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/08/11/twitterLimitingFollowersTo.html#comment-1164503</link><description>They can grow beyond 2000 followers.  It's the other way around--you can't follow more than 2000 people.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ericflo</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 22:49:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google App Engine + Memcached + FF To Go = Bliss</title><link>http://benjamingolub.com/2008/05/28/google-app-engine-memcached-ff-to-go-bliss/#comment-545907</link><description>Ahh I see--foot, meet mouth :)  Still, it's cool stuff.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ericflo</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 20:40:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google App Engine + Memcached + FF To Go = Bliss</title><link>http://benjamingolub.com/2008/05/28/google-app-engine-memcached-ff-to-go-bliss/#comment-545855</link><description>Sorry, Disqus is not so great for code snippets :(</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ericflo</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 20:30:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google App Engine + Memcached + FF To Go = Bliss</title><link>http://benjamingolub.com/2008/05/28/google-app-engine-memcached-ff-to-go-bliss/#comment-545851</link><description>I think you might be better off caching the entire response, as then subsequent requests don't even have to go through the template system, context processors, etc.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For example:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;...&lt;br&gt;key = 'public_%i_%i_%s' % (num, start, service)&lt;br&gt;response = memcache.get(key)&lt;br&gt;    if not response:&lt;br&gt;        try:&lt;br&gt;            data = f.fetch_public_feed(num=num, start=start, service=service)&lt;br&gt;        except Exception, e:&lt;br&gt;            return HttpResponseRedirect('/%s/' % e)&lt;br&gt;        extra_context = {&lt;br&gt;            'entries': data['entries'],&lt;br&gt;            ‘next’: start + num,&lt;br&gt;        }&lt;br&gt;        if start &amp;gt; 0:&lt;br&gt;            extra_context['has_previous'] = True&lt;br&gt;            extra_context['previous'] = start - num&lt;br&gt;        response = render_to_response(’public.html’, extra_context, context_instance=RequestContext(request))&lt;br&gt;        memcache.set(key, response, CACHE_TIME)&lt;br&gt;    return response</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ericflo</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 20:30:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The road less traveled: Extending the user model: profiles in Django</title><link>http://sam.bluwiki.com/blog/2008/05/extending-user-model-profiles-in-django.php#comment-534096</link><description>...but you'll have to do that every time you import User, correct?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ericflo</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 04:04:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The road less traveled: Extending the user model: profiles in Django</title><link>http://sam.bluwiki.com/blog/2008/05/extending-user-model-profiles-in-django.php#comment-533555</link><description>I would rather use the dispatcher to automatically create UserProfile objects.  For instance put this in your models.py file below UserProfile:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;from django.db.models import signals&lt;br&gt;from django.dispatch import dispatcher&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;def create_userprofile(sender, instance):&lt;br&gt;    defaults = {} # customize this for your defaults&lt;br&gt;    UserProfile.objects.get_or_create(user=instance)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;dispatcher.connect(create_userprofile, sender=User, signal=signals.post_save)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now what will happen is that every time User.save() gets called, this create_userprofile function will get called, creating a new UserProfile, as needed.  This is a slightly more transparent solution than yours, in my opinion.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ericflo</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 00:21:37 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>