<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for engtech</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/engtech/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 07:36:09 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: gReader Comments</title><link>http://www.sixteenseven.com/gReader/#comment-1143766</link><description>I have just gone through this site.This contains interesting downloads and pictures.&lt;br&gt;=====================&lt;br&gt;williams&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=www.google.com&gt;google&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">williams</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 07:36:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Movie Notes: 2 Days In Paris</title><link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2008/05/07/movie-notes-2-days-in-paris/#comment-437883</link><description>That's funny. Well, I've already seen it and I definitely liked it :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2008/05/07/movie-notes-2-days-in-paris/</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 15:56:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Movie Notes: 2 Days In Paris</title><link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2008/05/07/movie-notes-2-days-in-paris/#comment-437859</link><description>Remember when I said you should see "Paris J'Taime". I got the name wrong. This is the movie I meant. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">engtech</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 15:54:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sharing presentations is fun &amp;#8212; really</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/05/08/sharing-presentations-is-fun-really/#comment-433210</link><description>Don't forget confreaks&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://confreaks.com/"&gt;http://confreaks.com/&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">engtech</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 18:08:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Attention Bloggers: Track Who Is Writing Notes About Your Posts</title><link>http://benjamingolub.com/2008/05/07/attention-bloggers-track-who-is-writing-notes-about-your-posts/#comment-427427</link><description>Ya I never really meant for people to go to those sorts of urls.  Yours is&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.rssmeme.com/source/6870/"&gt;http://www.rssmeme.com/source/6870/&lt;/a&gt;.  Adding another item to my todo list :P</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">http://benjamingolub.com/2008/05/07/attention-bloggers-track-who-is-writing-notes-about-your-posts/</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 16:49:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Attention Bloggers: Track Who Is Writing Notes About Your Posts</title><link>http://benjamingolub.com/2008/05/07/attention-bloggers-track-who-is-writing-notes-about-your-posts/#comment-427396</link><description>Might want to put in a better 404 page:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.rssmeme.com/source/internetducttape.com/"&gt;http://www.rssmeme.com/source/internetducttape....&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">engtech</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 16:43:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter: IRC with a new shade of lipstick</title><link>http://www.winextra.com/2008/05/05/twitter-irc-with-a-new-shade-of-lipstick/#comment-421888</link><description>one big disagreement: twitter's value add wasn't putting HTML around IRC.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It was abandoning channels and letting everyone control who they are individually listening to. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It completely killed the +ops crap that made IRC get on your nerves after a while.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">engtech</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 17:58:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Movie Notes: The Science Of Sleep</title><link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2008/05/06/movie-notes-the-science-of-sleep/#comment-421673</link><description>Will definitely do.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2008/05/06/movie-notes-the-science-of-sleep/</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 17:21:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Movie Notes: The Science Of Sleep</title><link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2008/05/06/movie-notes-the-science-of-sleep/#comment-421645</link><description>"french romantic comedy"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Give Paris J'Taime a watch. Pretty good flick.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">engtech</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 17:17:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Does Twitter need to be killed or fixed?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/05/05/does-twitter-need-to-be-killed-or-fixed/#comment-418259</link><description>"Twitter needs to be decentralized and standardized because it’s as important as the DNS system behind the Internet."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;say it with me now... I-R-C</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">engtech</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 21:43:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Movie Notes: Bulletproof Monk</title><link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2008/05/03/movie-notes-bulletproof-monk/#comment-411486</link><description>Heh - he just needs to be cast in the right role, like one that demands a lot of crazy faces and having sex with food. He would have been great in Soul Plane.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2008/05/03/movie-notes-bulletproof-monk/</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 18:30:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Movie Notes: Bulletproof Monk</title><link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2008/05/03/movie-notes-bulletproof-monk/#comment-411130</link><description>I mean, he was so amazing in those two movies he did with the Rock.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">engtech</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 15:13:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Movie Notes: Bulletproof Monk</title><link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2008/05/03/movie-notes-bulletproof-monk/#comment-411129</link><description>So what you're saying is that a Seann William Scott movie could be bad....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Never!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">engtech</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 15:12:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Movie Notes: A Guy Thing</title><link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2008/05/02/movie-notes-a-guy-thing/#comment-409424</link><description>Heh, definitely not. But if not a "guy" thing, whose exactly? I have no&lt;br&gt;idea.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2008/05/02/movie-notes-a-guy-thing/</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 21:52:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Movie Notes: A Guy Thing</title><link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2008/05/02/movie-notes-a-guy-thing/#comment-408523</link><description>Apparently it wasn't a guy thing.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">engtech</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 18:53:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Should Bloggers Open Up Their Statistics?</title><link>http://www.louisgray.com/live/2008/04/should-bloggers-open-up-their.html#comment-399333</link><description>Maybe we need to start a secret cabal. :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://openstats.blogspot.com"&gt;openstats.blogspot.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">engtech</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 21:19:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Should Bloggers Open Up Their Statistics?</title><link>http://www.louisgray.com/live/2008/04/should-bloggers-open-up-their.html#comment-399217</link><description>There is definitely some risk of being boring. I know that my monthly summaries rarely get comments, while more discussion-friendly topics (like this) do spur conversation. But for some reason, the way I'm wired, I really dig the stats. I remember yours and Jason of Webomatica used to do them quite a bit, which in turn, inspired my monthly updates. I would read yours and others if they were posted.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">http://www.louisgray.com/live/2008/04/should-bloggers-open-up-their.html</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 20:47:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Should Bloggers Open Up Their Statistics?</title><link>http://www.louisgray.com/live/2008/04/should-bloggers-open-up-their.html#comment-399065</link><description>"Talking about visit counts can be seen as off-limits as one's salary."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Actually, talking about visit counts can be seen as being boring. :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I use to do this all the time when I started blogging ( &lt;a href="http://internetducttape.com/category/statistics-and-navel-gazing/"&gt;http://internetducttape.com/category/statistics...&lt;/a&gt; )... then I realized people who aren't also bloggers don't really care.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's like how most sidebar widgets benefit the blogger instead of the reader. Your stats are interesting to you because it's your blog. Other people? Not so much.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">engtech</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 20:16:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 4,000 new users - someone pass the aspirin</title><link>http://www.winextra.com/2008/04/25/4000-new-users-someone-pass-the-aspirin/#comment-381966</link><description>I don't doubt that currently Macs are to some extent more secure out of the box than PCs because of their unix history. However while damage to the underlying OS install maybe harder the fact that the user data can be gotten at alone should suggest that at some point once Mac's market share proves attractive to malware authors that it to will need increasing better security measures.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It isn't a matter of if it will happen to the Mac but more of a matter of when.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">http://www.winextra.com/2008/04/25/4000-new-users-someone-pass-the-aspirin/</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 01:05:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 4,000 new users - someone pass the aspirin</title><link>http://www.winextra.com/2008/04/25/4000-new-users-someone-pass-the-aspirin/#comment-381896</link><description>If they're using the same security set up as their unix base then they should be inherently more secure because you aren't running as administrator - ever.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's really hard to do long term damage to an OS without admin access, although you can still trash all the user data.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But yeah, that's kind of boneheaded move. There probably going to be at least two months of lost productivity because of the new OS... I wonder how many of those 4000 have never used OSX?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">engtech</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 00:43:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to get Twitter some S BUX</title><link>http://mrontemp.blogspot.com/2008/04/how-to-get-twitter-some-s-bux.html#comment-381641</link><description>There's still a lot of Starbucks out here in Ottawa</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">engtech</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 23:05:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GReader Shared Links - the new territory of self-promotion</title><link>http://www.winextra.com/2008/04/25/greader-shared-links-the-new-territory-of-self-promotion/#comment-381208</link><description>our own stuff is never as awesome or blogosphere shattering as we like to&lt;br&gt;think. I can't count the number of times I have written a post that I&lt;br&gt;thought was da' bomb only to see it sink like a torpedoed ship :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">http://www.winextra.com/2008/04/25/greader-shared-links-the-new-territory-of-self-promotion/</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 20:59:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GReader Shared Links - the new territory of self-promotion</title><link>http://www.winextra.com/2008/04/25/greader-shared-links-the-new-territory-of-self-promotion/#comment-381131</link><description>So true.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I try to save promoting my posts for a "this is really awesome!" moment, and it's amazing how often what I think is an awesome post doesn't match the reality of what the rest of the world likes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What I find works better is stepping aside and letting other people tell you what they like of your content via links/comments. Then throw some promotion juice behind what's already been socially vetted.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">engtech</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 20:42:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Video comments - another case of &amp;quot;just because we can&amp;quot;</title><link>http://www.winextra.com/2008/04/24/video-comments-another-case-of-just-because-we-can/#comment-380209</link><description>video comments only make sense if your readers are young and hot.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">engtech</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 17:47:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Put A Spin On Your Lifestream With Dipity</title><link>http://shegeeks.net/put-a-spin-on-your-lifestream-with-dipity/#comment-379629</link><description>Here's mine: &lt;a href="http://www.dipity.com/user/engtech/timeline/Eric_T"&gt;http://www.dipity.com/user/engtech/timeline/Eric_T&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Kinda scary the amount of time I spend interrupting myself online.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">engtech</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 15:42:38 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>