<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for eng1ne</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/eng1ne/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 23:40:35 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Do You Want To Have Michael Phelps Baby?</title><link>http://shegeeks.net/do-you-want-to-have-michael-phelps-baby/#comment-1707069</link><description>Already sold out.. I hope you got your order in!  They were limited edition, apparently.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">eng1ne</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 23:40:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hulu Sucks Donkey Balls &amp;ndash; So Please Stop Using It In Posts</title><link>http://www.winextra.com/2008/08/13/hulu-sucks-donkey-balls-so-please-stop-using-it-in-posts/#comment-1410308</link><description>Oh wow, check out the new theme!  Good work!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">eng1ne</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:36:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Disqus 2.0 WordPress plugin broken?</title><link>http://disqus.disqus.com/disqus_20_wordpress_plugin_broken/#comment-1228094</link><description>the advice I got was to download the very latest version of the 2.0 plugin to stop the duplication issue from continuing, and a fix for existing dupes is in the works.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.disqus.net/2008/08/13/notes-about-the-new-plugin/#comment-1221608"&gt;http://blog.disqus.net/2008/08/13/notes-about-t...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">eng1ne</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 03:24:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Disqus 2.0 WordPress plugin broken?</title><link>http://disqus.disqus.com/disqus_20_wordpress_plugin_broken/#comment-1228067</link><description>Thanks Daniel, I sent in an email and got a good reply from Jason, I think the situation is under control, and you guys have promised to help resolve the issue soon, so that's good enough for me!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">eng1ne</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 03:22:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Disqus 2.0 WordPress plugin broken?</title><link>http://disqus.disqus.com/disqus_20_wordpress_plugin_broken/#comment-1226932</link><description>We really regret not picking up this bug before releasing the plugin, but we've located the problem and are fixing it at the moment. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If this is a huge issue at the moment, you may want to jump back onto the old plugin until the fix is pushed live. Sorry, Phil.</description><pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 02:32:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Disqus 2.0 WordPress plugin broken?</title><link>http://disqus.disqus.com/disqus_20_wordpress_plugin_broken/#comment-1226149</link><description>Good lord!</description><pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 01:52:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Disqus 2.0 WordPress plugin broken?</title><link>http://disqus.disqus.com/disqus_20_wordpress_plugin_broken/#comment-1226064</link><description>Up to over 4,000 comments in the dashboard.  I'm going to have to switch back to the older plugin if this keeps up.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">eng1ne</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 01:41:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Disqus 2.0 WordPress plugin broken?</title><link>http://disqus.disqus.com/disqus_20_wordpress_plugin_broken/#comment-1223277</link><description>That's gotta suck man :(</description><pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 00:03:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to Beat Louis Gray at the Early Adopter Game</title><link>http://ourdoings.com/ourdoings-startup/2008-08-11#comment-1215542</link><description>Glad you like it.  One more tip: If you try it, use a large pile of photos.&lt;br&gt;One or two won't really give you the experience.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">http://ourdoings.com/ourdoings-startup/2008-08-11</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 19:40:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: rizzn's personal blog</title><link>http://rizzn.com/blog/2008/08/achtung-austinites.php#comment-1215358</link><description>Although my blog isn't Austin-specific, it is a social media blog and I live in Austin (well, Round Rock).  &lt;a href="http://www.scribkin.com"&gt;http://www.scribkin.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm definitely thinking of adding more regional content to it, though.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">eng1ne</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 19:26:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Disqus Takes Commenting to the Next Level</title><link>http://www.louisgray.com/live/2008/08/disqus-takes-commenting-to-next-level.html#comment-1209023</link><description>I've been running it since it was first released, installed smooth but the local message sync seems to be broken -- it is importing multiples of each message into my local WordPress message store (approx 500 messages in Disqus, now up to 2000 in WP).  I have left a message on the official support forum already.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">eng1ne</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 15:21:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to Beat Louis Gray at the Early Adopter Game</title><link>http://ourdoings.com/ourdoings-startup/2008-08-11#comment-1208867</link><description>Thanks for the OurDoings tip.. neat stuff!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">eng1ne</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 15:13:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Disqus 2.0 WordPress plugin broken?</title><link>http://disqus.disqus.com/disqus_20_wordpress_plugin_broken/#comment-1207820</link><description>The Disqus plugin installed smoothly for me, but something bad is happening when it tries to sync the comments with wordpress.  I am getting massive duplication of comments in Wordpress.  At last count, Disqus says I have 487 comments, and WordPress Dashboard now says I have 2,755 comments.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When I look at the comments in WordPress, each one is duplicated 5, 6 or more times.  And it has been growing constantly since I installed the plugin yesterday.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">eng1ne</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 14:41:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Disqus Clout: Fail!</title><link>http://www.scribkin.com/2008/05/13/disqus-clout-fail/#comment-1171923</link><description>Well, Disqus revamped its site and WP plugin just today, so maybe they did some work on their karma system.  It wouldn't surprise me.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">eng1ne</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 19:45:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Friday Fun: New Scripts To Pimp FriendFeed &amp;amp; Feedly</title><link>http://www.sarahintampa.com/sarah/2008/08/08/friday-fun-new-scripts-to-pimp-friendfeed-feedly.html#comment-1135687</link><description>I love it when people I follow do really cool things like Better FriendFeed!  Thanks for the notice!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">eng1ne</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 17:27:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sharing is Caring : My Guest Post On ReadBurner</title><link>http://www.jeffisageek.net/blog/2008/08/01/sharing-is-caring-my-guest-post-on-readburner/#comment-1072151</link><description>You are very welcome, Jeff!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">eng1ne</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 15:51:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Commenting Approach</title><link>http://jameswilliams.me/developer/blog/2008/07/commenting-approach/#comment-1063508</link><description>I am a registered Disqus user, and therefore I can comment here. Excellent.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nice integration, by the way.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">eng1ne</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:29:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Getting too social?</title><link>http://colinwalker.me.uk/2008/07/31/getting-too-social/#comment-1062814</link><description>You would have to reshare them.  Liking or commenting does not make them visible.  I believe this is to protect syndication of non-original work to some extent.   With apologies to Colin for promotion within a comment, I have a blog entry about it &lt;a href="http://www.scribkin.com/2008/07/20/advanced-friendfeed-tip-the-imaginary-friend/"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">eng1ne</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:31:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Getting too social?</title><link>http://colinwalker.me.uk/2008/07/31/getting-too-social/#comment-1062755</link><description>OK, that I didn't know. So those Tweets aren't streamed as NPRNews (Friend of ___) ? If not, do they become visible if I comment on them or "Like" them or would I have to "Reshare" them?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">http://colinwalker.me.uk/2008/07/31/getting-too-social/</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:25:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Getting too social?</title><link>http://colinwalker.me.uk/2008/07/31/getting-too-social/#comment-1062648</link><description>Imaginary friends can only be seen by you, so they are spam only if you consider them so.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">eng1ne</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:15:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Getting too social?</title><link>http://colinwalker.me.uk/2008/07/31/getting-too-social/#comment-1062615</link><description>Understood.  I get your point, sorry if I used your post as a soap-box of my own ;).  I could actually make the argument that there may be too much blow-back actually.. for example, plurk *does* tell people how to use their service, but that doesn't stop people from using it any way they like.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think maybe the greater point is for a social service to be truly successful, it has to limit through functionality rather than rules.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">eng1ne</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:13:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Getting too social?</title><link>http://colinwalker.me.uk/2008/07/31/getting-too-social/#comment-1062387</link><description>Phil,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I completely agree that those that aren't active shouldn't be listed as recommended people to follow on FriendFeed and, yes, I over-simplified your post but it is a worrying trend that people consider there should be a right or wrong way to use these services.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">http://colinwalker.me.uk/2008/07/31/getting-too-social/</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:54:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Stop the dog-pile: freshen your cache</title><link>http://blog.rssmeme.com/2008/07/stop-dog-pile-freshen-your-cache.html#comment-1061387</link><description>Right, I noticed better response times in the afternoon.. thanks for the follow-up!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">eng1ne</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:31:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Getting too social?</title><link>http://colinwalker.me.uk/2008/07/31/getting-too-social/#comment-1061304</link><description>I feel obligated to respond, since you kindly linked my article here (thank you).  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mostly, I agree with Shey's points about Steve Gillmore and FriendFeed.  But further, I was dismayed because he was listed as a suggested person to follow on the service, thousands of people followed him, and had active, positive conversations on his syndicated tweets.. without any apparent interaction with the man himself.  I was dismayed that he was &lt;em&gt;missing out&lt;/em&gt; on these interactions.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As it turns out, he may not have been missing out, he did comment on the original article and said that just because he didn't reply in FriendFeed didn't mean he wasn't watching.  He did not go so far as saying he was involved, just that he wasn't &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; involved.  I suppose I could say the same thing about God.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That said, upon reflection I would say I don't have a problem with people using FriendFeed (or any other social media service) as a pure aggregator.  That doesn't mean I would call them fully-engaged, though 'poser' has connotations that don't make it the best word.. let's say 'placeholder' for those accounts.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Plus, if I think further about Steve's strategy in the media, is it to interact with everyone that has something to say to him?  Hardly.  Conversations are happening, on FriendFeed and other service, due to his influence.  Although he may not be directly involved, people are learning from each other based on his influence.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So, if the tables were turned and I suddenly had the radio show and the newspaper column and the popularity, and I was called a poser, could I refute it?  No.  By my own definition I'm probably a much bigger poser (outside of FriendFeed) than him.  Would I care?  Probably not.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">eng1ne</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:24:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Stop the dog-pile: freshen your cache</title><link>http://blog.rssmeme.com/2008/07/stop-dog-pile-freshen-your-cache.html#comment-1060979</link><description>Unfortunately the dog-pile effect isn't gone completely.  It's still possible that it can happen and RSSmeme will be slow.  My tests show that things are getting better though and the site is currently up and running.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">http://blog.rssmeme.com/2008/07/stop-dog-pile-freshen-your-cache.html</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:56:00 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>