<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Phil McClure</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/ed6af864a76dea14893e2286d6216bff/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 23:26:09 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Beyond RSS</title><link>http://rogelsview.disqus.com/beyond_rss/#comment-1227567</link><description>I don't think I'm following the concept of your program.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Digg, and some of the social sites are bad because they use "collective wisdom" to elevate the importance of a story and that's bad.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Your program is good because people can vote up relevant stories.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How is what you're doing with this any different from what digg et.al. are doing?  It seems to be the same to me except your users are "meta-moderating" the moderated content from other providers (to borrow a slashdot phrase).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Am I just not getting it?  Is there something to it that I'm just not picking up on?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Phil McClure</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 23:26:09 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>