<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Collin T miller</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/ed64926147995b3fce2ed2bc04f94537/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 04:34:24 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Vene, vidi, Venice &amp;#8212; the TV killer</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/vene_vidi_venice_8212_the_tv_killer/#comment-1309205</link><description>Tank the crooked way providers currently sell access?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sounds great to me.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There is plenty of bandwidth, underused infrastructure and overcharging to force providers into their right position as merely packet transporters.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The same could not yet be said for the wireless industry, though I believe their time will come more swiftly than those with wires.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Collin T miller</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 04:53:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You keep using that word &amp;#8220;distributed&amp;#8221;&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://virtuouscode.disqus.com/you_keep_using_that_word_8220distributed82218230/#comment-2952605</link><description>I suggest GitTorrent&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(er I suggest that somebody design and implement it)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Collin T miller</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 22:37:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ruby Happy Hour June 3rd</title><link>http://outsideinblog.disqus.com/ruby_happy_hour_june_3rd/#comment-10374253</link><description>Sounds excellent. I'll in.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Collin T miller</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 23:13:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pusher &amp;amp; Async With Thin
      -
      macournoyer's blog</title><link>http://macournoyer.disqus.com/pusher_amp_async_with_thin_macournoyers_blog/#comment-11708744</link><description>Oh excellent!&lt;br&gt;Mind if I use your DeferrableBody code in &lt;a href="http://github.com/collin/orbited-ruby" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://github.com/collin/orbited-ruby&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Collin T miller</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 21:14:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pusher &amp;amp; Async With Thin
      -
      macournoyer's blog</title><link>http://macournoyer.disqus.com/pusher_amp_async_with_thin_macournoyers_blog/#comment-11970549</link><description>@macournoyer&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;:) Awesome. This post and the resources linked to within have proven invaluable :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://github.com/collin/orbited-ruby/tree/master" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://github.com/collin/orbited-ruby/tree/master&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Have it almost working with the existing Orbited client code :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anybody have a notion of when we can expect to have a unified asynchronous callback api in Rack? Thin is nice, but it'd be even nicer if more rack servers could be expected to run this stuff.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Collin T miller</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 04:34:24 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>