http://disqus.com/people/ebb511c14b388d74aae49c6b0bd93996/enThu, 08 Jan 2009 11:32:16 -0000http://sbspalding.disqus.com/facebook_how_to_disable_beacon_88/#comment-954951It's true that fb is collecting a bunch of data via beacon, but on the other hand I'm much more worried about Google, as they a lot more data via analytics.ritchieMon, 21 Jul 2008 08:12:56 -0000http://andybeard.disqus.com/why_trafficjamcom_really8230_91/#comment-10993437I totally agree with your thoughts on the "usability" of Blogrush &amp; Co.; but it's a real pity that there is no such service for blogs in other languages - it's totally impossible to do this kind of rush-marketing if your blog uses a language other than English.ritchieTue, 06 May 2008 08:21:28 -0000http://andybeard.disqus.com/why_trafficjamcom_really8230_91/#comment-12527836I totally agree with your thoughts on the "usability" of Blogrush &amp; Co.; but it's a real pity that there is no such service for blogs in other languages - it's totally impossible to do this kind of rush-marketing if your blog uses a language other than English.ritchieTue, 06 May 2008 08:21:28 -0000http://andybeard.disqus.com/exclusive_share_a_post_beta_8211_blog_post_syndication/#comment-10994639I'm pretty sure a simple backlink won't solve the duplicate content problem - sadly.ritchieWed, 18 Jun 2008 15:39:07 -0000http://andybeard.disqus.com/exclusive_share_a_post_beta_8211_blog_post_syndication/#comment-12528958I'm pretty sure a simple backlink won't solve the duplicate content problem - sadly.ritchieWed, 18 Jun 2008 15:39:07 -0000http://agenturblog.disqus.com/zensur_20_bei_flickr/#comment-2045690Also langsam wird mir FlickR richtig unheimlich:<br><a href="http://blog.datenschmutz.net/2007-07/flickr-jake-appelbaum-und-die-zensur-in-hongkong/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.datenschmutz.net/2007-07/flickr-jak...</a>ritchieThu, 12 Jul 2007 02:18:47 -0000http://zweipunktnull.disqus.com/twollow_die_neue_spam_schleuder_fur_twitter/#comment-5057863Ich würd da unbedingt eine dedizierten Account anlegen - Twitter erlaubt 70 Follow-Transactions/Stunde, wenn das regelmäßig mehr sind, landet man eher früher als später auf der Spamliste.ritchieThu, 20 Nov 2008 07:52:27 -0000http://klingerio.disqus.com/gain_more_followers_by_greeting_your_blog_visitors_with_their_twittername_rsaquo_andreas_klinger_io/#comment-4989194Fantastico! I'll add the js today.ritchieThu, 08 Jan 2009 11:32:16 -0000http://mashable.disqus.com/youporn_rising/#comment-5929661Update on youporn and ads: <a href="http://blog.datenschmutz.net/2007-04/schon-wieder-google-youporn-action/" rel="nofollow">Schon wieder youporn-Action</a>ritchieTue, 15 May 2007 10:45:12 -0000http://hinterzimmer.disqus.com/contaxe_8211_eine_alternative_zu_google_adsense/#comment-13259643Wobei die Verbindung von statischen und dynamischen Ads ein durchaus innovativer Ansatz ist; außerdem hat contaxe ja den großen Vorteil, aus den Fehlern von Adsense lernen zu können.ritchieWed, 13 Jun 2007 05:21:33 -0000http://hinterzimmer.disqus.com/die_adsense_alternative_8211_contaxe_l228uft_heiss/#comment-13259777Seit heute ist Contaxe online - ich hab mal den ersten Banner bei mir eingebaut und ein paar Erfahrungswerte gepostet:<br><a href="http://blog.datenschmutz.net/2007-07/die-ersten-contaxe-erfahrungen/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.datenschmutz.net/2007-07/die-ersten...</a>ritchieMon, 09 Jul 2007 12:21:03 -0000http://feuerhakenpolitikblog.disqus.com/hilfe_bei_der_wahlentscheidung_endorsement_08/#comment-16050447Ich hab meiner Endorsement heute veröffentlicht, quasi in letzter Minute - und lieg mit <a href="http://blog.datenschmutz.net/2008-09/endorsement-wahlempfehlung-wen-oder-was-morgen-waehlen-und-wozu/" rel="nofollow">LIF</a> anscheinend eh im Bloggertrend :-)ritchieSat, 27 Sep 2008 17:47:29 -0000http://garryconn.disqus.com/are_you_letting_people_pay_to_take_your_position_in_search/#comment-17877375That's an interesting interpretation... but it misses one point in my opinion: Google does NOT stop the advertisers, but the small bloggers. AS is not a very lucrative income model for longtail sites, but for Google - I think it's more about protecting their own business model, which is completely okay - as Google is a profit-oriented company. But it's definitely not about protecting "small" bloggers.ritchieWed, 31 Oct 2007 10:53:37 -0000http://garryconncom.disqus.com/are_you_letting_people_pay_to_take_your_position_in_search/#comment-18589595That's an interesting interpretation... but it misses one point in my opinion: Google does NOT stop the advertisers, but the small bloggers. AS is not a very lucrative income model for longtail sites, but for Google - I think it's more about protecting their own business model, which is completely okay - as Google is a profit-oriented company. But it's definitely not about protecting "small" bloggers.ritchieWed, 31 Oct 2007 10:53:37 -0000