Hello!
The comments on this profile are unclaimed and thus are unverified.
Do they belong to you? Claim these comments.
Violet Weed
Is this you? Claim Profile »
5 months ago
in A Proposal to Filter Christian Churches on duncanriley.com
So in Australia, are you GUILTY until proven INNOCENT? You said that "4% of clerics were ACCUSED..." not "FOUND GUILTY".
Mister Prime Minister, think of the INNOCENT.
Sheesh! Thank gawd I live in the great USA and not in some country that forces me to prove my innocence. (No, I don't molest children... hmmm, well, I DO like to molest MEN, who are mostly childish... or there I go! guiltifying men without a trial.
Mister Prime Minister, think of the INNOCENT.
Sheesh! Thank gawd I live in the great USA and not in some country that forces me to prove my innocence. (No, I don't molest children... hmmm, well, I DO like to molest MEN, who are mostly childish... or there I go! guiltifying men without a trial.
2 replies
Duncan Riley
Violet, I totally agree, which is why the same rules the Australian Government proposed to the internet should be applied to churches. Indeed, statically, churches are a bigger risk. Won't someone think of the children!
Jon Seymour
Violet, just in case this is not clear, Duncan's proposal is a parody which exploits the logic of the Australian Government's case for censoring the Internet to suggest that churches should themselves be "filtered" in order to prevent child abuse.
You are right to make the point about GUILTY until proven INNOCENT. Under the Government's proposal, all adults are considered to be potential child sex offenders who cannot be trusted to use the Internet responsibly.
You are right to make the point about GUILTY until proven INNOCENT. Under the Government's proposal, all adults are considered to be potential child sex offenders who cannot be trusted to use the Internet responsibly.
