<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Randall</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/e99a94cd44b11ebba187724eba31f5a4/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 10:33:41 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: http://platypusmaximus.blogspot.com/2009/09/houston-you-got-problem-and-i-still.html</title><link>http://pmmf.disqus.com/httpplatypusmaximusblogspotcom200909houston_you_got_problem_and_i_stillhtml/#comment-22514466</link><description>I am Randall Patterson, and I approve of this message. But who are you?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Randall</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 10:33:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://michellesfamilyjournal.blogspot.com/2008/06/wordless-wednesdayrainy-days.html</title><link>http://michellesfamilylife.disqus.com/httpmichellesfamilyjournalblogspotcom200806wordless_wednesdayrainy_dayshtml/#comment-22017854</link><description>Stepping in the puddles is the most fun about rain.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Randall</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 02:29:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Ron Paul Situation or: How He Learned That A Republican Can Utilize the Internet as Well</title><link>http://parislemon.disqus.com/the_ron_paul_situation_or_how_he_learned_that_a_republican_can_utilize_the_internet_as_well/#comment-7775304</link><description>Who IS Ron Paul? They still need to know!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;NOBODY&lt;/b&gt; explains Ron Paul&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BETTER than Ron Paul himself!&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here is an interactive audio archive of&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ron Paul speeches and interviews in chronological&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;order. Worth a look!&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;http://www.ronpaulaudio.com&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.ronpaulaudio.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.ronpaulaudio.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Randall</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 20:27:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Herb Chambers complaint, commentary &amp;#038; update</title><link>http://cosmictap.disqus.com/herb_chambers_complaint_commentary_038_update/#comment-1212322</link><description>Does anyone else find it a bit funny that these "Herb Chambers" employees: a. write like eight year olds and b. seem to have a "blame the customer" approach?  Give me a break.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Randall</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 06:51:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pop Skank and Eye Candy Review</title><link>http://cosmictap.disqus.com/pop_skank_and_eye_candy_review/#comment-1340062</link><description>yes, into the dumpster with Britney, once and for all .. please!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Randall</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 23:27:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Housing Implode-o-Meter makes CEOs cry</title><link>http://theminnesotaindependent.disqus.com/housing_implode_o_meter_makes_ceos_cry/#comment-1684668</link><description>Actually, Fox DID lose the clip, but our savvy readers picked it up, and sent it in (it was a live interview around 2 pm). Here's the link (4-minutes):&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.redlasso.com/ClipPlayer.aspx?id=eaaa2234-298b-41b3-97ad-aef9b628c09e" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.redlasso.com/ClipPlayer.aspx?id=eaaa...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In regards to "don't offer many solutions," that I would have an issue with. By exposing the hypocrisy from within, creating transparency from the AE in the field to the Boardroom planners, we have become part of the HUMAN solution.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In some cases where a company lays off 30 people in one part of the state, and 40 more in another, we become the communication link letting them know to check the WARN Act.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Many Mortgage companies have had to think twice, and then think again before they mistreat either the public, or their employees because of the Implode-O-Meter...  the truth WILL get out there, it WILL be published in papers and the 'net coast-to-coast, and corporations WILL act more responsible with the knowledge we are watching, and reporting.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Industry whistle blowers send us the info and hundreds-of-thousands, including the mainstream press and the regulators watch our site daily.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's good for the industry, and your term "watch-dog" is appropriate.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Randall Marquis, Senior Editor&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Mortgage Lender Implode-O-Meter&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.ml-implode.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.ml-implode.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Randall</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 20:35:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MLS All Star Starting XI Named</title><link>http://majorleaguesoccertalk.disqus.com/mls_all_star_starting_xi_named/#comment-1783655</link><description>I thought that these 11 were just named to the team and wouldn't necessarily be starting.  Is that wrong?&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, I'm a little surprised by Gomez.  He really struggled early on.&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Randall</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 10:25:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Did My Students Drink the Kool-Aid?</title><link>http://andrewmcafee.disqus.com/did_my_students_drink_the_kool_aid/#comment-5487472</link><description>In these responses, I sense an overwhelming desire to flatten organizations and open up the channels of communication.  I wonder though, how long it will be until we reinstitute the traditional hierarchies of communication which have evolved to control information overload in larger organizations.  If we can't ensure a good signal-to-noise ratio, these communcation channels will be ignored at the top and information will continue to flow downhill.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What are some of the best ways you have found to aggregate and measure information contributed by a flat organization that limit distractions at the top, but also allow the important things contributed at the bottom to flow up quickly?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think we all need to improve visablity, it is imperative in a highly functioning organization, but it is also important to focus our time wisely.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What are some of the ways Enterprise 2.0 tools are helping us strike a balance?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Randall</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 15:01:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Week 1 in the MIA!</title><link>http://andyzweibel.disqus.com/week_1_in_the_mia/#comment-6914941</link><description>I am a member of the UGA redcoat band and had the privilege of having Mr. Tom Keck as my band director for 3 yrs. You all at Miami have an awesome director and we here at UGA felt the same way about him. He is one of the best directors I have ever met and I wish yall the best at the U.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Randall</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 11:08:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Week 1 in the MIA!</title><link>http://andyzweibel.disqus.com/week_1_in_the_mia/#comment-6914942</link><description>btw, we thought the same thing here at UGA about him looking like Steve Carell. The trumpet section made the "I Love Lamp" shirt and also made a shirt saying "Loud Noises". He even dressed up like evan baxter (noah) at band camp (with another section dressed up as animals).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Randall</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 11:11:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Broncos squander playoff berth</title><link>http://allthingsbroncos.disqus.com/broncos_squander_playoff_berth/#comment-16336699</link><description>miserable offensive line, miserable schemes defensively, 1 questionable running back, improved not-so-special teams, it's time for some beef on this team, not anymore finesse.  bowlen, i hope you take note and make some wholesale changes in the offseason, it's getting harder every year to line your pockets with my money.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Randall</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 03:51:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of the day &amp;#8211; Marriage</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_8211_marriage/#comment-18130529</link><description>Why should marriage be between two consenting adults?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As one poster noted earlier, go to Utah, Arizona, Qatar or Yemen.  Man is not inherently monogamous and the current marriage laws represent a Christian understanding of marriage.&lt;br&gt;This inherently discriminates against Muslims, Mormons, and many Animists who practice polygamy.&lt;br&gt;Since we have a strong and justified Feminist movement than Polyamory would be justified also.&lt;br&gt;It may seem radical explicitly or in writing but is not that what we have today anyway with conservative Republican well educated candidates swinging, cheating, multiple partners, promiscuity.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We already have serial polygamy or maybe it should be called serial monogamy with divorce and multiple (even if at different times) spouses.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If there is a Separation of Church and State that should disallow heterosexual exclusivity in government sanctioned marriages and benefits than why should there be monogamy or permanence or any other Christian influenced aspect of marriage.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Polygamy existed in human civilization for millenia.  Polygamy was more accepted than homosexuality in Arab pre-Islamic, African, Islamic, much of pre-Christian Europe, and modern US at least with Mormons and other sects.&lt;br&gt;There is no intrinsic reason outside of religion to make marriage only for two adults.&lt;br&gt;In fact, an established polygamy may stabilize families and provide institutionalized support greater than the current flawed child support process.  Of all races and cultures, but especially in the African American community you have a high rate of out of wedlock births (as established by statistics not stereotype and without conclusion per se) with many males who have babies through different women (creating a pop culture phenomenon that is called even in some academic research "my baby's mama")  There is not a tie nor financial support outside government coercion or the perhaps more important (or at least important) father figure role in the life of the child--thus polygamy could establish a family tie with multiple women (in Islam it is up to 4 at any given time)and thus necesitate involvement in their family.&lt;br&gt;Many males, especially in lower income and minority divorce or non married situations do not feel involved (perhaps by choice no doubt) as it is not their family and the care of the child is taken outside the male and separate from him.  If the male, allowing his natural inclinations, could have that child's mother in a relationship but also other women--that would be good for the child by establishing a formalized relationship.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Randall</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 14:37:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://4littlemen.blogspot.com/2008/05/wordless-wednesday.html</title><link>http://4littlemengirlytwins.disqus.com/http4littlemenblogspotcom200805wordless_wednesdayhtml/#comment-19644053</link><description>Great shot Brittany!  Makes you hungry for chocolate. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Randall</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 11:39:00 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>