<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for marc</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/e5721b5c888052e0b0e41db1dfc4c238/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:01:26 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Apple's brand promise, and how blogging can fix it (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/apples_brand_promise_and_how_blogging_can_fix_it_scripting_news/#comment-14461</link><description>comments are open? no way! when? why?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">marc</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 16:20:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: An ad on Facebook (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/an_ad_on_facebook_scripting_news/#comment-14820</link><description>welcome to the new face of facebook. here are a couple more examples I've been "collecting." One back from July 27, 2007:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mil8/917285149/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/mil8/917285149/&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">marc</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 14:20:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: An ad on Facebook (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/an_ad_on_facebook_scripting_news/#comment-14828</link><description>throw me a bone dave and accept my friend invite! ;-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">marc</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 14:31:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Best wishes to Scoble (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/best_wishes_to_scoble_scripting_news/#comment-34023</link><description>Best of luck Robert!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">marc</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 01:24:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Plausible Deniability Just Doesn&amp;#039;t Cut It Mr Arrington</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/plausible_deniability_just_doesn039t_cut_it_mr_arrington_76/#comment-10992247</link><description>Very good analysis of the issues. I totally agree with you. Mike writes, 'the event organizers had it all wrong' and then continues, 'i read 10% of my email' and when asked by Rick if he'll do the show says, 'I said sure, if we can work out the details.'</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">marc</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 19:31:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Plausible Deniability Just Doesn&amp;#039;t Cut It Mr Arrington</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/plausible_deniability_just_doesn039t_cut_it_mr_arrington_76/#comment-12526670</link><description>Very good analysis of the issues. I totally agree with you. Mike writes, 'the event organizers had it all wrong' and then continues, 'i read 10% of my email' and when asked by Rick if he'll do the show says, 'I said sure, if we can work out the details.'</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">marc</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 19:31:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google and GolfNow.com Create AdWords Success Commerical</title><link>http://howardlindzon.disqus.com/google_and_golfnowcom_create_adwords_success_commerical/#comment-190271</link><description>wow. great commercial for goog. truly hits on the value they provide a SMB. impressive.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">marc</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:36:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Serving the space between - Yahoo Publisher Network</title><link>http://everwas.disqus.com/serving_the_space_between_yahoo_publisher_network/#comment-10398485</link><description>Ian, We're excited that you've joined the YPN team and look forward to working with you.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">marc</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 13:50:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: flickr images in space and time</title><link>http://everwas.disqus.com/flickr_images_in_space_and_time/#comment-10398496</link><description>I've played with the flickr geomap tool a bit and I'm not sure I totally get the value. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If your pics are of a time and place that you want geotargeted...it's sorta obvious where the pics were taken in the first place. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Techcrunch for example. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Great UI and integration of flickr...I just think there may be a better use for it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">marc</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 12:52:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: flickr images in space and time</title><link>http://everwas.disqus.com/flickr_images_in_space_and_time/#comment-10398498</link><description>OK...I like that filter. Lil' more useful. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;thanks inky!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;[you can find my scotland trip photos 'mil8' on the map]</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">marc</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 12:09:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 1K Project</title><link>http://everwas.disqus.com/1k_project/#comment-10398500</link><description>Awesome!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">marc</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 16:08:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sony Mylo</title><link>http://everwas.disqus.com/sony_mylo/#comment-10398502</link><description>i want one now! :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">marc</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 01:18:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Internet as a Ball of Thread</title><link>http://everwas.disqus.com/the_internet_as_a_ball_of_thread/#comment-10398518</link><description>&lt;a href="http://timecapsule.yahoo.com/capsule.php?i=2962&amp;amp;t=love&amp;amp;l=en" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://timecapsule.yahoo.com/capsule.php?i=2962&amp;t;=love&amp;l;=en&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Looking forward to seeing where we end up beaming it from... Mexico got nixed from the plans. :(</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">marc</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 23:36:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reuters opens up bureau in Second Life. Can taxation be far behind?</title><link>http://everwas.disqus.com/reuters_opens_up_bureau_in_second_life_can_taxation_be_far_behind/#comment-10398522</link><description>too bad online poker is now illegal. you can be sure that steve wynn would be building on the next soon to be discovered island in second life.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">marc</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 13:41:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Once we can address the past, we have time travel</title><link>http://everwas.disqus.com/once_we_can_address_the_past_we_have_time_travel/#comment-10398525</link><description>you lost me at, "web 2.0" LOL!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">marc</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 22:51:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lumos Labs - brush away the cobwebs of your mind</title><link>http://everwas.disqus.com/lumos_labs_brush_away_the_cobwebs_of_your_mind/#comment-10398574</link><description>cool company. I'll check it out.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BTW, I think "beta" is the new "black." :P</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">marc</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 09:28:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The movers are here!</title><link>http://baratunde.disqus.com/the_movers_are_here/#comment-1949595</link><description>No "Starving Students" for your move? ;-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There's a lesson in marketing for 'ya... Hire under-nourished, studious kids who need to augment their income from Mommy and Daddy with dangerous labor involving refrigerators and breakables.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">marc</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 11:16:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: del.icio.us millionth user &amp;#038; birthday bash |  
Laughing Squid</title><link>http://laughingsquid.disqus.com/delicious_millionth_user_038_birthday_bash_laughing_squid/#comment-1806392</link><description>Five days...two Y! parties... What's going on next week!? ;-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">marc</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 00:44:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hollywood Sign |  
Laughing Squid</title><link>http://laughingsquid.disqus.com/hollywood_sign_laughing_squid/#comment-1806412</link><description>ahh... you should've swung by! Sorry we missed you on your trip! :(</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">marc</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 19:12:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WordCamp 2007 Photos |  
Laughing Squid</title><link>http://laughingsquid.disqus.com/wordcamp_2007_photos_laughing_squid/#comment-1808570</link><description>Cool event! When is typepad expo?!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">marc</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 18:59:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Your Child A Tagger? Asks The City of Santa Ana, CA</title><link>http://laughingsquid.disqus.com/is_your_child_a_tagger_asks_the_city_of_santa_ana_ca/#comment-1811191</link><description>Does the stencil actually have to say 'STENCIL'? LOL</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">marc</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 01:51:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What I&amp;#8217;m most excited about now&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://marketingbeginsathome.disqus.com/what_i8217m_most_excited_about_now8230/#comment-4680095</link><description>Dave,&lt;br&gt;Thank you for your excitement. Things are coming together and with the help of you and your friends, the event will be killer. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Read all about on the wiki.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Great meeting you @ the expo.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;best,&lt;br&gt;marc</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">marc</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 15:09:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Starting With A Clean Slate</title><link>http://marketingbeginsathome.disqus.com/starting_with_a_clean_slate/#comment-4680578</link><description>Happy New Year to you David. May next year bring you lots of smiles and not as many dust-bunnies as last year. :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree with your thoughts on Jewish funerals and Yom Kippur will always bring back the thoughts of wearing dress shoes that are too tight (since only being worn 1x a year.) I think a healthy dose of Yoga thrown into any religion could help anyone ... I find it more spiritually lifting than any traditional service I've sat through.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">marc</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 18:47:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pissing off the blogosphere&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/pissing_off_the_blogosphere8230/#comment-9668312</link><description>Robert,&lt;br&gt;It seems like it's wishful thinking to *expect* your competitors to link to you for better reporting on a topic. At the end of the day, the sites you take issue with are your competitors. As far as I can tell, they did not steal your content and not credit you...they reported on the same story you did but did not link to you for more in-depth coverage. [Your point that you posted :30 minutes before they did is not material since they could have had more editorial review processes to go through including legal...which you probably do not.] Hoping they'd do this is one thing...but expecting them to and calling them out for not doing it... I don't think that's appropriate.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Because of your rant, I watched the video tour. It was interesting and entertaining. Perhaps that was the end-goal...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You create great content...you competitors shouldn't be expected to pimp it for you.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;best,&lt;br&gt;marc</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">marc</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 19:12:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Going to SXSW?</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/going_to_sxsw/#comment-9672545</link><description>Stubb's BBQ.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">marc</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 19:21:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Off to Davos&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/off_to_davos8230/#comment-9699351</link><description>WTF on the Nikon... I thought you were a canon-man. ;-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What would Hawk say?! LOL</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">marc</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 23:26:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Has Microsoft caught up to Google in search?</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/has_microsoft_caught_up_to_google_in_search/#comment-9701683</link><description>Search is a commodity. Yahoo! and Google's SERP's are nearly identical to the un-trained (non-SEO) eye. Have a look: &lt;a href="http://twingine.no/search.php?q=scoble&amp;amp;lang=" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://twingine.no/search.php?q=scoble&amp;amp;lang=&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The difference in market-share comes from brand equity and (more importantly) DISTRIBUTION. People 'google' and advertisers spend budget with Google because of their vast network of publishers who syndicate their SERP's, adsense and domain-related adsense.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If MSN or YHOO wants to win here, they better marketing AND better distribution. The SERPS are just the commodity in this game.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">marc</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 02:38:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The secret to Twitter</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/the_secret_to_twitter/#comment-9703064</link><description>Robert,&lt;br&gt;I can't disagree with you more. Why not "follow everyone" then? I don't think you following that many people is "authentic." You don't read their tweets... how can you even claim to be following them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's a giant river of chatter... you look for the big fish (like Calacanis to borrow your example) and ignore the little fish. I don't follow you because although I've met you in person and think you are quality guy, the relationship with you on Twitter is a waste of attention because your attention is too distracted.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;P.S. I don't think you even believe this position you're taking and are only doing it to get more comments to your blog.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">marc</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 11:35:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Adsense for Conversations</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/adsense_for_conversations/#comment-9426018</link><description>Adsense for conversations? Isn't that just called "gMail"?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">marc</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 23:54:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Newspapers Commoditizing Web Ad Inventory; Reducing Revenue in the Process</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/newspapers_commoditizing_web_ad_inventory_reducing_revenue_in_the_process/#comment-9434285</link><description>The real question is how are ad networks helping/hurting web-publishers (and their shareholders) and what will Yahoo's new network mean to all this once it has ramped up to full speed and continues to scale?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">marc</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:01:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Blog Design:  Tell me what you think!</title><link>http://socialmediablogbritopian.disqus.com/new_blog_design_tell_me_what_you_think/#comment-10535958</link><description>I love the new look! Very spiffy!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;the math... i'm not a fan of though! ;-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">marc</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 12:03:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why I Stopped Using Twitter</title><link>http://publishing20.disqus.com/why_i_stopped_using_twitter/#comment-13572855</link><description>twitter users fall into two camps. People that add/follow anyone and those that only add their friends. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;twitter has too much noise when you add anyone that adds you... be more deliberate and twitter has real utility.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;going a step deeper...you also can divide those you follow into web-only updates and SMS notices...that too can make a difference in the utility. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;YOU control the utility... saying twitter is a massive waste of time only points to your application of the tool...not to the app itself.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">marc</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 02:36:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Do You Network on Different Social Sites?</title><link>http://techipedia.disqus.com/how_do_you_network_on_different_social_sites/#comment-14968811</link><description>1) Linked-in used to be pure. Made up of those I only knew in "real-life." I've break that rule more often than I'd like if the background of the person sounds interesting and I think the connection can be mutually beneficial (read: beneficial to me since they've already determined they think it would be beneficial to them.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2) Facebook. I hold a strong line here. I only 'add' people that I know. Period. End of story. I know people put 'value' against their network in sheer size but I prefer quality of network over that other perceived value because a) I appreciate the cleanliness of my FB in-box (only email in there is from people that won't spam me.) b) I have more personal information contained on FB than 'just my resume' so I therefore want to keep those links, pics, thoughts, videos, etc. slightly more protected from people I don't know. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;gt; click.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">marc</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 09:11:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Las Vegas Pubcon Yahoo Party</title><link>http://toprankblog.disqus.com/las_vegas_pubcon_yahoo_party/#comment-17126365</link><description>&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://dogballs.typepad.com/my_weblog/2006/11/a_new_reason_to.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;more pics here&lt;/a&gt;:</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">marc</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 18:46:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Las Vegas Pubcon Yahoo Party</title><link>http://toprankblog.disqus.com/las_vegas_pubcon_yahoo_party/#comment-17126367</link><description>[blushing] LOL. Chris is going to be huge. I hope we can afford him when he makes it really BIG. ;-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">marc</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 16:23:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Getting Hacked as Link Bait</title><link>http://toprankblog.disqus.com/getting_hacked_as_link_bait/#comment-17128107</link><description>Lee,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1) Wake-up&lt;br&gt;2) Check calendar&lt;br&gt;3) Blog&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;:-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;P.S. I wasn't sure myself...I posted the screen shot on flickr and wasn't sure if it was a 1337 haxxor or a clever april fools' joke.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">marc</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 21:19:25 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>