Re: “Feds and Internet Service Providers Don’t Mix”

Charles — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 22:37:28 -0000

I don't understand how one can take the side of comcast on the network management issue. Imagine I buy a plan from comcast and the ad tells me "unlimited internet access at speed X" and comcast, without informing me, lowers my connection speed and, after a while, tells me "you're using too many ressources, so we're going to cut you off". How, as a customer, was I not subject to false advertising?

To be clear, I'm not agains bandwidth caps, differential speed pricing, per-byte pricing schemes or preferential treatment of certain applications or protocols. I want comcast to tell me though what the actual terms of my contract are so I can pick a different carrier if I don't like those terms. The free market only works if consumers are told what they're getting.

I don't like the KFC analogy one bit in that respect. This isn't like asking KFC to disclose its recipe. This is more like KFC advertising an "all you can eat" meal where they come by your table to serve you every 10 minutes, except when you actually order the meal, they come by your table twice then stop. Then after an hour, they bring you the bill and tell you to pay and go, there isn't enough food to serve you. So again, I have nothing against KFC only offering "per-chicken" pricing, but they'd better not advertise it as "all you can eat".

I thought that was the 'transparency' at issue here. (Nevermind the net-neutrality arguments that there should be no protocol specific management.)

Disqus - Latest Comments for Charles

Re: “Feds and Internet Service Providers Don’t Mix”