<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Alexander Falk</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/e3a50c9afe9e1b41c4d7c094b7ca3442/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 08:17:20 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: XBRL and the New Four</title><link>http://accman.disqus.com/xbrl_and_the_new_four/#comment-20914262</link><description>Excellent point! And for those who wish to build such an organization focused on the technology, we have just the right XBRL developer tools that we released this month: &lt;a href="http://blog.altova.com/2009/02/xbrl-support-added-to-altova-missionkit.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://blog.altova.com/2009/02/xbrl-support-add...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexander Falk</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 08:17:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who Owns Your Financial Data?</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/who_owns_your_financial_data_95/#comment-3092</link><description>Great topic. But in addition to trust and ownership of financial data there is another issue to consider: one would normally expect a financial software to get the basics of math. Not so with Mint! They just promised me that I can save $35,977 by switching to CapitalOne: &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.xmlaficionado.com/2007/09/mint-pomises-to-save-me-35977.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.xmlaficionado.com/2007/09/mint-pomis...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Not a joke - I've posted actual screenshots!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexander Falk</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 23:52:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How To Critique The Techcrunch40 (Day Two)</title><link>http://sbspalding.disqus.com/how_to_critique_the_techcrunch40_day_two/#comment-1883674</link><description>Here is a related question for Mint: How To Get Your Math Right.&lt;br&gt;Step 1: don't promised your customers that they can save $35,977 by switching to CapitalOne. &lt;br&gt;See my blog for full details and screenshots:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.xmlaficionado.com/2007/09/mint-pomises-to-save-me-35977.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.xmlaficionado.com/2007/09/mint-pomis...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexander Falk</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 23:56:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mint: The easiest way to manage your personal finances</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/mint_the_easiest_way_to_manage_your_personal_finances/#comment-14678379</link><description>Nice report and screenshots, but I must say that I've rarely seen a company being so much over-hyped without any foundation. How could Mint win the TC40, without being scalable or getting their math right? They just promised me that I can save $35,977 by switching to CapitalOne: &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.xmlaficionado.com/2007/09/mint-pomises-to-save-me-35977.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.xmlaficionado.com/2007/09/mint-pomis...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Not a joke - I've posted actual screenshots!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexander Falk</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 23:59:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: See The Game</title><link>http://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/see_the_game/#comment-8513055</link><description>Very interesting observation - totally rings a bell for me. I've always likened life in general to being akin to a game. With every new level you achieve in life, the monsters out there become a bit more powerful, but so do the treasure/rewards, too. Then again, maybe I'm taking this "game" thing a bit too literally... :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexander Falk</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 12:06:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thanks so much for all the kind words&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/thanks_so_much_for_all_the_kind_words8230/#comment-9690210</link><description>Congrats!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexander Falk</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 22:23:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This guy just won a &amp;#8220;mint&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/this_guy_just_won_a_8220mint8221/#comment-9690438</link><description>My concern with &lt;a href="http://mint.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;mint.com&lt;/a&gt; isn't that I need to share my login info with the service (I already need to do that today with Microsoft Money).&lt;br&gt;My concern is that it apparently doesn't scale:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.xmlaficionado.com/2007/09/mint-not-ready-to-scale.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.xmlaficionado.com/2007/09/mint-not-r...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexander Falk</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 08:04:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TechCrunch 40 winner: Mint</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/techcrunch_40_winner_mint/#comment-9690484</link><description>Re DW: turns out that Mint is actually using Yodlee (just like Microsoft Money), they just add a spiffier Web 2.0 UI and a way to target tons of ads at people - all under the pretext of helping them save money.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Re the video itself: Aaron actually says that unlike Quicken, where adding a few accounts takes one hour, in Mint you can to it in 5 minutes. That's quite bold and completely untrue. Going to Mint today, this is the message I get for adding an account (that I've been trying to add for 3 days now):&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mint is currently experiencing delays adding accounts.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Your accounts will continue to process in the background. It may take up to an hour for your transactions and balances to come through.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Usually linking an account takes 30-90 seconds, but since winning TechCrunch40, and being featured in PCWorld, Digg, and San Francisco Chronicle our volume has gone up over 100x.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Quicken: 1 hour -- Mint: more than 3 days.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;See also this post on my blog about their scalability issue:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.xmlaficionado.com/2007/09/mint-not-ready-to-scale.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.xmlaficionado.com/2007/09/mint-not-r...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexander Falk</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 15:32:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Best sandwich in America</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/best_sandwich_in_america/#comment-9690512</link><description>Yumm!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexander Falk</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 23:31:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TechCrunch 40 winner: Mint</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/techcrunch_40_winner_mint/#comment-9690477</link><description>Dear Aaron Patzer:&lt;br&gt;I truly appreciate your response to my comment. And I immediately went back to &lt;a href="http://mint.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;mint.com&lt;/a&gt; tonight to give it another try. I was indeed able to add 1 (one) account - the other three show the same errors.&lt;br&gt;Oh, and btw, you now owe me $35,977 which your site just promised I could save by switching to CapitalOne:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.xmlaficionado.com/2007/09/mint-pomises-to-save-me-35977.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.xmlaficionado.com/2007/09/mint-pomis...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Not a joke - I've posted actual screenshots and used my own actual credit card account.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexander Falk</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 23:38:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The 10 rules of Twitter (and how I break every one)</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/the_10_rules_of_twitter_and_how_i_break_every_one/#comment-9690733</link><description>I enjoy your Twitter ramblings (and I hope you enjoy mine) - it's a great tool and different people use it for different purposes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As far as rules are concerned: I don't remember having to click-accept any 7 page legal document when signed up for Twitter - so as far as I'm concerned there are no rules... :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexander Falk</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 20:58:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: An ode to great photographers</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/an_ode_to_great_photographers/#comment-9690625</link><description>Very nice photos!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexander Falk</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 21:03:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Steve Ballmer still doesn&amp;#8217;t understand social networking</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/steve_ballmer_still_doesn8217t_understand_social_networking/#comment-9691154</link><description>You hit the nail on the head with that one! And it's not just Web 2.0: before it there was the Internet itself (Bill Gates had to rewrite his book on that one), the browser, and many other products that Microsoft ultimately acquired after a while, because they didn't jump on the bandwagon early enough.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We live in interesting times, indeed. If you look at just the last 2-3 weeks and what news came out of Google, Microsoft, and Yahoo - there is an interesting synchronicity going on here: Office, Social Networking, Search, Office, Social Networking, Search, ... - is it just me, or is there a pattern here?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And it all revolves around platforms for advertising dollars :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.xmlaficionado.com/2007/10/google-microsoft-and-yahoo-interesting.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.xmlaficionado.com/2007/10/google-mic...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexander Falk</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 15:27:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Challenge to the Zune Advocates</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/a_challenge_to_the_zune_advocates/#comment-9691320</link><description>So there are actually people who like the zune?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Can we talk about the new iPod nano instead? My son bought one the other day (to replace his previous old-gen nano) - and loves it 100%. He even spent his own savings to buy one.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of course he much rather wanted an iPhone, but after the last 1.1.1 update I didn't approve that expense... :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Plus I'm probably going to buy the next-gen iPhone in the spring of 2008 (or whenever it comes out) and he can have the hand-me-down then.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexander Falk</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 16:31:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Buying TechCrunch on the Kindle</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/buying_techcrunch_on_the_kindle/#comment-9694518</link><description>Hi Robert:&lt;br&gt;I received my Kindle today, too, and happened to read you blog post on my Kindle this evening, as I was busy testing features and experimenting with the device. Congrats, btw, on getting Scobleizer syndicated through the Kindle store - I am one of your paying subscribers now ... at least for the free 14-day trial ... :)&lt;br&gt;Here is my personal review of the Kindle afer playing with it for about 3-4 hours (including a visit to the hair dresser):&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.xmlaficionado.com/2007/11/amazon-kindle-review.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.xmlaficionado.com/2007/11/amazon-kin...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexander Falk</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 01:04:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Going to SmugMug</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/going_to_smugmug/#comment-9695351</link><description>I've been using SmugMug for over a year now and am very pleased with it. For an example, see my photo collection at &lt;a href="http://afalk42.smugmug.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://afalk42.smugmug.com/&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexander Falk</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 13:47:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Media and Video As Conversation Agent &amp;#8211; Speaking at DMAW Confab</title><link>http://vergenewmedia.disqus.com/social_media_and_video_as_conversation_agent_8211_speaking_at_dmaw_confab/#comment-20314534</link><description>For my point of view: yes, you are doing it right. You are keeping it authentic - and that's crucial with social media. In a sense, the social network is the true "reality" of media.&lt;br&gt;Interesting thought: the so-called "reality TV" is mostly totally scripted, whereas the reality of social networks only works if it is unscripted, unedited, and totally authentic...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexander Falk</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 10:08:01 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>