<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for AK</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/e28ce654a0318ae886031b49ca8fc60a/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 18:50:36 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: An Unpersuasive Argument against Regulation</title><link>http://tlf.disqus.com/an_unpersuasive_argument_against_regulation/#comment-1448478</link><description>I'll dismiss it. If this hypothetical company wanted a speed advantage, they could pay their ISP for a faster connection. They could set up multiple sites or go with a a company like &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akamai" rel="nofollow"&gt;Akamai&lt;/a&gt; who has created a business around creating a speed advantage for their customers. What they shouldn't need to do is go around and pay baksheesh to each ISP to go a little faster to their customers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am not in favor of net neutrality legislation, yet. The major cases of net neutrality violation have been overseas and the FCC has properly slapped down ISPs who block VOIP, so I don't see the need. For one thing, I think telco lobbyists would twist it horribly. But this is a ridiculous argument against it for anyone who actually understands how the Internet works.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AK</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 10:38:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Response to Greg Aharonian</title><link>http://tlf.disqus.com/a_response_to_greg_aharonian/#comment-1451248</link><description>Noel, you don't agree with Tim. We get that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He's been pointing out what he thinks is wrong with software patents. Could you try explaining how they promote innovation?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AK</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:43:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fun With Greg and Tim</title><link>http://tlf.disqus.com/fun_with_greg_and_tim/#comment-1451233</link><description>Angry dude, the answers in that faq are either incompetent or dishonest. The very fact that the EU is discussing software patents right now disproves its claims.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AK</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 01:39:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What&amp;#8217;s the Pro-Software-Patent Argument?</title><link>http://tlf.disqus.com/what8217s_the_pro_software_patent_argument/#comment-1451257</link><description>Noel, that's one interpretation. The other is that now that Bill Gates has made good, he wants laws that would limit the competition his company faces. Why do I find that more likely?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AK</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 01:46:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A hypercolor umbrella</title><link>http://ideaprovince.disqus.com/a_hypercolor_umbrella/#comment-9515707</link><description>Anyone here seen the photo umbrella? &lt;a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2006/09/21/umbrella_shows_a_fli.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.boingboing.net/2006/09/21/umbrella_s...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AK</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 18:50:36 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>