<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Seb</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/e2817487205438a0a9786d089982b5f8/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 08:58:17 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Does FOO Camp matter?</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/does_foo_camp_matter/#comment-1294886</link><description>We should launch a FOM (friends of MESH) Camp in Canada!  :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Seb</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:00:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Linked In just doesn&amp;#8217;t get it</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/linked_in_just_doesn8217t_get_it/#comment-1305744</link><description>I personally find LinkedIn very useful but it's really a question of critical mass of contacts.  I found that once I reached 200+ contacts (I now have 500+), it became much more useful.  I can now reach more than 2M people through my network, which means I can reach anyone in any tech-oriented company when I need to.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Seb</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 08:58:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Yahoo just needs to fix one thing: Monetization</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/yahoo_just_needs_to_fix_one_thing_monetization/#comment-14670722</link><description>Good post.  I agree with the analysis but isn't it ironic that the same problem seem to be plaguing all traditional media as well (re: their online initiatives).  I've been reading a a lot of reports lately about how newspapers for example do not monetize their online traffic as well as their offline circulation.  Is Google the only company able to properly monetize their eyeballs?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Seb</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 10:17:21 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>