<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Mish</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/e233eca52d8d71b51c94001b4247ebfc/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 13:43:18 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Talking online merchants and sales tax on the CAM Blog Podcast</title><link>http://camblog.disqus.com/talking_online_merchants_and_sales_tax_on_the_cam_blog_podcast/#comment-3866460</link><description>The Episcopal Bookstore is an awesome online store. I reccomend doing business with them.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mish</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 15:43:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Talking online merchants and sales tax on the CAM Blog Podcast</title><link>http://camblog.disqus.com/talking_online_merchants_and_sales_tax_on_the_cam_blog_podcast/#comment-3866515</link><description>&lt;a href="http://www.episcopalbookstore.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Episcopal Church Lectionary&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mish</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 15:47:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What do Sacha Baron Cohen, Michael Jackson, and Paris Hilton all have in common?</title><link>http://antartica.disqus.com/what_do_sacha_baron_cohen_michael_jackson_and_paris_hilton_all_have_in_common/#comment-13896855</link><description>richard lacayo can hardly be called an art critic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mish</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 14:54:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What do Sacha Baron Cohen, Michael Jackson, and Paris Hilton all have in common?</title><link>http://antartica.disqus.com/what_do_sacha_baron_cohen_michael_jackson_and_paris_hilton_all_have_in_common/#comment-13896856</link><description>While I agree that Lacayo&amp;#039;s article here is off-base, he&amp;#039;s written some intelligent things in the past.   Here&amp;#039;s an excerpt from his Whitney Biennial 2008 review: &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot; Like a lot of people, I also hate what the market has done to the experience of art, substituting the verdict of cash for every other judgment. But when I first heard that this year&amp;rsquo;s Biennial would be heavy on humble art, I winced. Small potatoes is a dish that the art world circles back to every decade or so, usually out of revulsion against a gluttonous market. The go-go gallery salesrooms of the 1960s led to the rise of deliberately unsalable performance art and earthworks. And the 1993 Biennial, the first to follow the Reagan-Bush era, featured work that its catalog solemnly promised &amp;ldquo;deliberately renounces success and power in favor of the degraded and the dysfunctional. &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;    And then there is today&amp;rsquo;s wave of success-renouncing, degradation-favoring art, much of which takes the form of listless flotsam-assemblage sculpture, things built from chunks of Styrofoam, torn cardboard or bits of twisted wire. It&amp;rsquo;s piled together with some measure of deliberation, but who can tell how much? Its heart may be in the right place, but it emits an awfully faint pulse.&amp;rdquo;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mish</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 13:43:18 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>