<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Melissa</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/dfb68a726f540352668c7e2bfa43c869/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 09:01:21 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: &amp;raquo; The Great Manicure Test</title><link>http://kim-werker-blog.disqus.com/raquo_the_great_manicure_test/#comment-2019092</link><description>Have you considered knitting with your toes?  I would only suggest that to you...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;[no need to publish this comment -- I won't be offended]</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Melissa</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 12:56:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;raquo; The Great Manicure Test: FAILED</title><link>http://kim-werker-blog.disqus.com/raquo_the_great_manicure_test_failed/#comment-2019105</link><description>Because my nails are so soft (flexi-nails, they've been called), they can't hold polish for more than 48 hours.  However, when I've wanted them to look nice for an occasion, I will buy the polish (or buy polish ahead of time and bring it to the manicure -- that's cheaper) so that I can do tiny touch-ups when I chip.  It isn't ideal because if you look closely, you can see that the manicure has been flawed, but since yours lasted a good four days, it may do the trick to make it work for another day or two.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Melissa</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 12:07:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: An Open Letter to Hipsters</title><link>http://kim-werker-blog.disqus.com/an_open_letter_to_hipsters/#comment-2019211</link><description>Ha!  I laughed out loud at those pictures... mostly because I remember them (I think I may have even been the photographer)!!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Melissa</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 14:38:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Combating the Vacuum, Part III</title><link>http://kim-werker-blog.disqus.com/combating_the_vacuum_part_iii/#comment-2019444</link><description>Though the photo does not depict the full view of your office space, I find it suspect that it appears that you have a framed photo of your dog, but not of your husband.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Melissa</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 13:52:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Talk to Me (Us All) About Palin: Open Thread</title><link>http://kim-werker-blog.disqus.com/talk_to_me_us_all_about_palin_open_thread/#comment-2799258</link><description>Okay... I didn't want to get involved, but I will.  For me, the distaste towards Sarah Palin is more personal, even, than political.  YES, I always consider who could land on the Supreme Court.  YES, abortion can be a single-issue vote for me.  However, I think that Palin is a total hypocrite, and THAT is what I have such a problem with.  Here's why:  She puts herself out on this motherhood and apple pie platform.  But, she's a woman who concealed her pregnancy from everyone (including her own children and parents) until the seventh month, knowing that she would have a special-needs child, and then returned to work three days after his birth.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Everyone has his/her priorities.  I get that (and I respect it... my values aren't for everyone and that's fine).  But, if you are going to go back to work with a three-day-old baby at home, then don't claim to be a supermom and don't attempt to make yourself relatable as a working mother.  I am a working mother, and the value that is most important to me is my work/life balance.  It's cliche, I know, but it's the truth of my life.  I would like to have government leaders who are sensitive to things like the Family and Medical Leave Act.  I want them to approve MORE benefits and MORE flexibility for working parents.  I have a hard time believing that someone who was okay with returning to work three days after having a baby is really going to be sympathetic to the working mom who needs more leave time.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Further, I don't want this to be interpreted to mean that I don't think that women can do great things or have powerful jobs.  I was a Hillary supporter and I think she would have been fabulous for this country.  However, my guess is that Hillary couldn't make it as mother of the year.  I want her to be my president -- not my mom.  The contrast, though, is that Hillary never put herself out on that whole I-am-Mommy-hear-me-roar platform -- she never claimed to be just like me because we're both working mothers.  I respect that.  I don't respect someone who has five (four?) kids, one of whom is a newborn, who is accepting a potential job that will require her to move her family to Washington, away from the supposedly close-knit support system they have in Alaska; that has already required her to be on the road consistently for months in her campaign; and that will also require her to travel and be unavailable for a good portion of the time if in office.  Who does that, and then claims that she can "relate" to the average American mom/woman?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Again, this all has very little to do with politics.  It has everything to do with her hypocrisy in maintaining a personal/professional life and how she portrays herself.  I don't care what anyone says; you CANNOT have it all.  I think that there are lots of women who are great moms and go a great job in their careers -- but none of them is vice president of the United States.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Melissa</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 09:01:21 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>