Do they belong to you? Claim these comments.
DWR
Is this you? Claim Profile »
2 months ago
in GARCIA WINS FIRST DISTRICT COUNCIL SEAT on The District Weekly
Venus:
I should've said Garcia "will be" a co-conspirator in wetlands destruction. It is based on endorsements from pro-development councilmembers Suja Lowenthal, Gary Delong, Mayor Foster, Dee Andrews and Val Lerch (all of whom received campaign donations from Thomas Dean); also endorsements from pro-development ex-Mayor O'Neill, Chamber of Commerce CEO Randy Gordon, the police and fire departments, the list goes on.
I should've said Garcia "will be" a co-conspirator in wetlands destruction. It is based on endorsements from pro-development councilmembers Suja Lowenthal, Gary Delong, Mayor Foster, Dee Andrews and Val Lerch (all of whom received campaign donations from Thomas Dean); also endorsements from pro-development ex-Mayor O'Neill, Chamber of Commerce CEO Randy Gordon, the police and fire departments, the list goes on.
2 months ago
in GARCIA WINS FIRST DISTRICT COUNCIL SEAT on The District Weekly
...and Garcia is another conspirator in wetlands and open space destruction.
The Gang of 6 (Mayor included) is now the Gang of 7.
The Gang of 6 (Mayor included) is now the Gang of 7.
1 reply
3 months ago
in ANOTHER WETLANDS VIGIL TONIGHT AT 5 on The District Weekly
Police Chief Batts was a supporter of Dean's Home Depot plan. His then spouse, Laura Richardson, voted "YES" for the H/P.
Don't assume Chief Batts is sympahetic to wetlands preservation.
Don't assume Chief Batts is sympahetic to wetlands preservation.
1 reply
Venus
DWR thank you for reminding everyone that LBPD Chief Batts was a supporter of Dean's Home Depot plan, and that his then spouse, Laura Richardson, voted in favor the Dean's Home Depot plan.
6 months ago
in RANK AND FILE on The District Weekly
Likewise here, Mr. B and LB City Girl.
12/31/2008 @ 1020PM; There's less than 2 hours left in 2008 and I've come up with this New Year's resolution the District Weekly can hold me to:
to NOT click on thedistrictweekly.com for all of 2009.
Kudos to the District Weekly for reminding how better time management is always a worthy New Year's resolution for nearly everyone. You know, like quitting smoking, watching less TV, exercising more, cleaning out the garage, blah, blah, blah...
While 2008 has been a blast here on the District's blog, may 2009 be a more peaceful and prosperous year for the nation and the planet.
Happy New Year everyone.
12/31/2008 @ 1020PM; There's less than 2 hours left in 2008 and I've come up with this New Year's resolution the District Weekly can hold me to:
to NOT click on thedistrictweekly.com for all of 2009.
Kudos to the District Weekly for reminding how better time management is always a worthy New Year's resolution for nearly everyone. You know, like quitting smoking, watching less TV, exercising more, cleaning out the garage, blah, blah, blah...
While 2008 has been a blast here on the District's blog, may 2009 be a more peaceful and prosperous year for the nation and the planet.
Happy New Year everyone.
6 months ago
in AMERICA TO DISINTEGRATE IN 2010 on The District Weekly
I strongly agree with both of you, LB City Girl and Mr. Greet.
1 reply
LB City Girl
Awwwwwwww, isn't it cute how we're all getting along?
6 months ago
in TEXT OF E-MAIL FROM “CHILDREN TODAY’S THERESA BIXBY AND JOSH LOWENTHAL” SUPPORTING GARCIA’S COUNCIL CAMPAIGN on The District Weekly
Whatever its legality, it's clear the Bixby-Lowenthal name machine is gambling Children Today's exemption status by soliciticing contributions for Robert Garcia's campaign. Since Garcia endorses a gay marriage movement that is calling for the revocation of the Mormon Church's exemption status, it's only fair that calls be made for the revocation of Children Today's exemption status.
I
I
6 months ago
in OPINION: IS ROBERT GARCIA ANOTHER SUJA LOWENTHAL? on The District Weekly
How about everyone (anonymites and real namers alike) just getting back to the primary topic: Robert Garcia's candidacy.
6 months ago
in HOORAY FOR McCAFE! on The District Weekly
Funny comment! Thanks for the comic relief McCrap, whoever you are...
6 months ago
in OPINION: IS ROBERT GARCIA ANOTHER SUJA LOWENTHAL? on The District Weekly
No. The issue is that Suja used the controversy for her own political gain. If Suja is opposed to these people residing her district, why didn't she know about them prior? She snapped into action only after it was reported in the media. Otherwise, she would've conveniently ignored them because she has proved herself unresponsive to residents' concerns.
6 months ago
in OPINION: IS ROBERT GARCIA ANOTHER SUJA LOWENTHAL? on The District Weekly
You've precisely hit a couple of nails squarely on their heads Mr. McCabe: It is just so easy for Suja (and Garcia) to preach publicly to the gay choir her NO on 8 support (purely for political capital) while keeping her other potentially controversial stances quiet until council-vote time. Until he can satisfactorily explain otherwise, I can see the same political qualities in Garcia.
Same thing with the unenforcable sexual offender zoning statute. Her "too bad" brush-off was a too easy PR band-aid aimed at placating the residents who complained and exploiting for political public relations a group of people who are socially stigmatized and perceived as powerless.
After your meeting Mr. McCabe, many people will be very interested to hear what you've gleaned from Robert Garcia; whether or not he is publicly "liberally progressive" on the residents' side while privately "conservative", siding with moneyed land developer/business interests in the vein of Suja Lowenthal.
Keep us posted. Thanks Jim.
Same thing with the unenforcable sexual offender zoning statute. Her "too bad" brush-off was a too easy PR band-aid aimed at placating the residents who complained and exploiting for political public relations a group of people who are socially stigmatized and perceived as powerless.
After your meeting Mr. McCabe, many people will be very interested to hear what you've gleaned from Robert Garcia; whether or not he is publicly "liberally progressive" on the residents' side while privately "conservative", siding with moneyed land developer/business interests in the vein of Suja Lowenthal.
Keep us posted. Thanks Jim.
6 months ago
in OPINION: IS ROBERT GARCIA ANOTHER SUJA LOWENTHAL? on The District Weekly
Right-on Juan! I second Juan's challenge to Robert Garcia to line-item each issue and provide a thorough response.
1 reply
not leaving a name
I third that challenge.
We have heard enough empty promises from twerps who what to be politician supermodels. Stop posing for the cameras and telling us that you are a young minority - we've got one of those already. We want financial statements to back up poetry and promises... in all the city council areas!
We have heard enough empty promises from twerps who what to be politician supermodels. Stop posing for the cameras and telling us that you are a young minority - we've got one of those already. We want financial statements to back up poetry and promises... in all the city council areas!
6 months ago
in OPINION: IS ROBERT GARCIA ANOTHER SUJA LOWENTHAL? on The District Weekly
Similar to my experience Dennis. I e-mailed Suja regarding parking issues a couple of times and she promptly ignored them. No response, no call-back, NADA! I cc'd to her staff and got the same result. Nothing.
I've heard the same thing from a person who's an attorney in downtown and he informed that Suja has garnered a widespread reputation for ignoring e-mails, phone calls, inquiries that aren't praising and patronizing of her. This, after she pledged in a campaign e-mail that if elected,she would be the most accessible member of the city council. Bullshit! I had e-mailed Dan Baker only three times during his tenure and each time got a timely response from either him or his chief of staff.
Since Garcia and Suja are so closely allied, he will be no more than a Suja-clone fully beholden to the land developer (Thomas Dean) and business (Randy Gordon) communities. DIstrict residents and their concerns/complaints will be banished to the sidelines if not totally ignored altogether.
I've heard the same thing from a person who's an attorney in downtown and he informed that Suja has garnered a widespread reputation for ignoring e-mails, phone calls, inquiries that aren't praising and patronizing of her. This, after she pledged in a campaign e-mail that if elected,she would be the most accessible member of the city council. Bullshit! I had e-mailed Dan Baker only three times during his tenure and each time got a timely response from either him or his chief of staff.
Since Garcia and Suja are so closely allied, he will be no more than a Suja-clone fully beholden to the land developer (Thomas Dean) and business (Randy Gordon) communities. DIstrict residents and their concerns/complaints will be banished to the sidelines if not totally ignored altogether.
1 reply
James
Ditto. Suja's office is complete nonresponsive. Dan Baker's staff were superior by far . Suja's doesn't even stoop to tell you to go away.
Of the entire self-serving Lowenthal clan, she is by far the most transparent. Second district is just a step-upon, step-over, step-around stone to her political ambitions.
Of the entire self-serving Lowenthal clan, she is by far the most transparent. Second district is just a step-upon, step-over, step-around stone to her political ambitions.
6 months ago
in SECRET SHOPPER on The District Weekly
Correction: Mr. Ruehle picked-up the torch for the BSRA.........BSBA et al.....
6 months ago
in SECRET SHOPPER on The District Weekly
Dear Mr B:
Mr. Ruehle picked-up the torch for the BSRA in fierce opposition to the tactics of the BSRA et al. How 'bout you do the same for the good tax-paying citizens of downtown Long Beach who are hyper-critical of the RDA and the councilmembers who rubber-stamp the redevelopment projects that most residents seem to oppose.
Just a friendly proposal idea......
Mr. Ruehle picked-up the torch for the BSRA in fierce opposition to the tactics of the BSRA et al. How 'bout you do the same for the good tax-paying citizens of downtown Long Beach who are hyper-critical of the RDA and the councilmembers who rubber-stamp the redevelopment projects that most residents seem to oppose.
Just a friendly proposal idea......
1 reply
John_B
DWR: I regularly communicate, both in person and in writing, with many of my elected and appointed officials.
Just ask them and they will confirm this (although some no doubt wish I would not communicate with them quite so often).
I am not a community organizer nor do I pretend to be. I am an individual private citizen who: Always votes; Always votes responsibly; Requires those we elect to be responsive to my requests for information; Closely monitors the actions and activities of our elected and appointed officials and makes my views crystal clear, to anyone who cares to listen, on how I believe our fine City should be operated.
That's who I am and what I do and all I ask is that more of the electorate in this city start doing the same. It is not only their right to do so...it is their responsibility.
Not everyone desires to be a public figure. Not all of us have the talents to organize or to lead groups of civic-minded people. And not everyone has to be.
But if more of us would simply personally participate in all levels of our government in a more constructive and educated fashion, many of the related challenges that people bring forth on DW and elsewhere would never occur in the first place.
You seem to misperceive my questions to Mike as some sort of personal attack. Nothing could be farther from the truth. Mike has my immense respect for being among the few residents in our City who consistently demand a higher standard of representation from our elected and appointed officials. Diana Bosetti is another. There are several others as well. I tip my hat to all of them.
I simply re-phrased Mike's questions and then addressed them to him (just as I did with Juan earlier) because he was the one who originally asked them.
We need to start re-framing these questions and these arguments. We need to remember that the government that so many of us have so many complaints about is, at the end of the day, *our* government. The government we have is *precisely* the government we deserve by virtue of our collectively poor participation in the process that creates it and then maintains it.
We need to remember that and then we need to start behaving as if we believe it.
If we do not do so, nothing will ever change.
Just ask them and they will confirm this (although some no doubt wish I would not communicate with them quite so often).
I am not a community organizer nor do I pretend to be. I am an individual private citizen who: Always votes; Always votes responsibly; Requires those we elect to be responsive to my requests for information; Closely monitors the actions and activities of our elected and appointed officials and makes my views crystal clear, to anyone who cares to listen, on how I believe our fine City should be operated.
That's who I am and what I do and all I ask is that more of the electorate in this city start doing the same. It is not only their right to do so...it is their responsibility.
Not everyone desires to be a public figure. Not all of us have the talents to organize or to lead groups of civic-minded people. And not everyone has to be.
But if more of us would simply personally participate in all levels of our government in a more constructive and educated fashion, many of the related challenges that people bring forth on DW and elsewhere would never occur in the first place.
You seem to misperceive my questions to Mike as some sort of personal attack. Nothing could be farther from the truth. Mike has my immense respect for being among the few residents in our City who consistently demand a higher standard of representation from our elected and appointed officials. Diana Bosetti is another. There are several others as well. I tip my hat to all of them.
I simply re-phrased Mike's questions and then addressed them to him (just as I did with Juan earlier) because he was the one who originally asked them.
We need to start re-framing these questions and these arguments. We need to remember that the government that so many of us have so many complaints about is, at the end of the day, *our* government. The government we have is *precisely* the government we deserve by virtue of our collectively poor participation in the process that creates it and then maintains it.
We need to remember that and then we need to start behaving as if we believe it.
If we do not do so, nothing will ever change.
7 months ago
in WHAT TO DO ABOUT PINE AVENUE on The District Weekly
Thank you for the correction Mr. B. I regret my error.
7 months ago
in WHAT TO DO ABOUT PINE AVENUE on The District Weekly
If that's precisely the sort of out-of-the-box "Imagineering" downtown-waterfront Long Beach needed, then Disney's early-1990s water amusement park proposal would've been a reality by now.
But the-then city council had to go and screw it up.
But the-then city council had to go and screw it up.
1 reply
John_B
DWR: If I'm not mistaken, the various roadblocks erected before the old Disney Sea concept, part of a larger Port Disney project, were actually set up by the Coastal Commission and the Port of Long Beach, not by the Council.
Disney was fully prepared to spend some $2 billion in 1990 dollars to develop Queensway bay but, sadly, the concept never got past the drafting table and the Mouse's temporary operation of the Queen Mary and Spruce Goose.
According to one source, the Coastal Commission didn't like the thought of Disney dredging and then re-filling some 250 acres of the bay to build it's idea of the happiest place in Long Beach and the Port wasn't much interested in seeing its operations disrupted or otherwise encroached upon.
But, as they say, that's polluted Queensway Bay water well under the bridge.
I feel strongly that some of the best answers for Pine are going to come from regular folks in the community…from residents that love Long Beach and don't necessarily have a dime to be made from what eventually happens downtown.
I most certainly could be wrong.
Disney was fully prepared to spend some $2 billion in 1990 dollars to develop Queensway bay but, sadly, the concept never got past the drafting table and the Mouse's temporary operation of the Queen Mary and Spruce Goose.
According to one source, the Coastal Commission didn't like the thought of Disney dredging and then re-filling some 250 acres of the bay to build it's idea of the happiest place in Long Beach and the Port wasn't much interested in seeing its operations disrupted or otherwise encroached upon.
But, as they say, that's polluted Queensway Bay water well under the bridge.
I feel strongly that some of the best answers for Pine are going to come from regular folks in the community…from residents that love Long Beach and don't necessarily have a dime to be made from what eventually happens downtown.
I most certainly could be wrong.
7 months ago
in STUDEBAKER LLC APPLIES FOR PERMIT TO BUILD HOME IMPROVEMENT CENTER ON EDGE OF WETLANDS–AGAIN on The District Weekly
Snider (if that is your real name) : There's no reason for you to really care what moniker anyone uses; anonymous or not. You are just a wannabe or neverbe journalist in search of a fantasy by-line. A large chunk of your unoriginal "dribble" consists of copying text from Wikipedia, Encarta and other sources. Very unoriginal, uncreative and uniteresting. Yawn!
BTW, Dave Wielenga has gone by other monikers too.
BTW, Dave Wielenga has gone by other monikers too.
7 months ago
in STUDEBAKER LLC APPLIES FOR PERMIT TO BUILD HOME IMPROVEMENT CENTER ON EDGE OF WETLANDS–AGAIN on The District Weekly
Andy: It's a sure bet Robert Garcia will be on the developers' side.
7 months ago
in STUDEBAKER LLC APPLIES FOR PERMIT TO BUILD HOME IMPROVEMENT CENTER ON EDGE OF WETLANDS–AGAIN on The District Weekly
LB City Girl: Wetlands preservation has been in the works longer than the sports park proposal. SInce Tonia Reyes-Uranga voted in favor of the original Home Depot plan, I favor denying Tonia her sports park. Soccer players and skateboarders have alternatives for practicing their favored activities; the wetlands have no place else to go.
Yes, I'm a wetlander all the way.
Yes, I'm a wetlander all the way.
1 reply
LB City Girl
DWR, I guess I don't understand why the two even have become connected. A person like myself believes we should restore the wetlands AND have the Sports Complex.
I also oppose the Home Depot project, though I'll admit, I'd love to have such a conveniently located place to purchase caulk. Lord knows the two Home Depots, the Lowes, and the other assorted hardware stores we already have simply aren't enough.
I also oppose the Home Depot project, though I'll admit, I'd love to have such a conveniently located place to purchase caulk. Lord knows the two Home Depots, the Lowes, and the other assorted hardware stores we already have simply aren't enough.
7 months ago
in ANIMALS CONTROLLED? on The District Weekly
It almost doesn't matter who is running the shelter because stupid, lazy people will continue to dump their pets when they no longer want to be bothered with them.
7 months ago
in BRING ME THE HEAD OF ROBERT GARCIA on The District Weekly
Raphael: I'm neither homophobic nor anti-gay nor a troll. I voted NO on 8. Yes, I just can't resist poking fun at you and your brethen for throwing a collective public hissy-fit because you didn't like the election result. If you don't like the heat then don't keep feeding this fire.
My gay neighbor friend, plus one other gay acquaintance agree and refuse to join you in your pity parties. They believe your loud public protests against a fair election result hurt more than help your cause.
My gay neighbor friend, plus one other gay acquaintance agree and refuse to join you in your pity parties. They believe your loud public protests against a fair election result hurt more than help your cause.
7 months ago
in BRING ME THE HEAD OF ROBERT GARCIA on The District Weekly
My gay neighbor liked it. But you are correct. It is lame on paper. Feel free to delete.
1 reply
Dave Wielenga
(wink)
7 months ago
in BRING ME THE HEAD OF ROBERT GARCIA on The District Weekly
My Saturday wildfire-themed comment / joke about how downtown Long Beach was burning with 2000 fired-up flamers was deleted.
1 reply
Dave Wielenga
If that happened, sorry --- although, honestly, you ought to be thanking us. Pretty lame.
7 months ago
in BRING ME THE HEAD OF ROBERT GARCIA on The District Weekly
Point is, Mr. B, no amount of debate is going to change my mind. So I'm doing you a little favor by not wasting your time and energy.
Your welcome for the playtime.
Your welcome for the playtime.
7 months ago
in BRING ME THE HEAD OF ROBERT GARCIA on The District Weekly
I still stand steadfastly in my belief that neither Robert Garcia nor Suja Lowenthal are what they publicly portend to be.
That's what my stance boils down to Mr. B. It is immaterial what debatable issues are involved.
That's what my stance boils down to Mr. B. It is immaterial what debatable issues are involved.
1 reply
John_B
And you're welcome to stand steadfastly in any belief you care to hold, DWR. I can't argue against a belief, merely the supposed facts that are used to support it.
But like it or don't, your stance in this case (as well as the issues upon which you are basing it) is, indeed, debatable and for this reason I have made an effort to do so.
Thanks for playing along! See you on the next topic!
But like it or don't, your stance in this case (as well as the issues upon which you are basing it) is, indeed, debatable and for this reason I have made an effort to do so.
Thanks for playing along! See you on the next topic!

Thank you for your participation in this discussion. I did not know Garcia was involved in wetlands destruction. Would you please post more information about this, perhaps including a link to a news article, etc.? Thank you very much.
Respectfully,
Venus