<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for delmar</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/delmar/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:29:42 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2008/10/hacker-news-tec.html</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/thread_627/#comment-2806486</link><description>that's how you inform yourself? eek. you're really self-selecting. sorry but that ain't enough. i use all three of the sources quoted above - but that's just the beginning of knowledge.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">delmar</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:29:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Calacanis: the Tony Robbins of Web 2.0</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/calacanis_the_tony_robbins_of_web_20/#comment-2714819</link><description>wow, that was snarky and utterly rude. why are you making it personl? calcanis is right about the coming shakeout. others have warned of it as well. before this is over, the web 2.0 ecosystem will be devastated.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">delmar</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 10:19:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Palin-Couric interview (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/palin_couric_interview_scripting_news/#comment-2630662</link><description>reminds me of one of the characters in the movie, "fargo"   of course, that qualifies me now as one of the effete east coast/west coast commie/homo/jew/elitists that look down their noses at the booboosie. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;so be it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;sorry but i'm not going to apologize any more. yes, i do want smart people in power who are curious and ask questions and aren't wedded to doctrine at the expense of pragmatism. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;she's a dope. pure &amp; simple. after two terms of "heckuva job, brownie" i'm in no mood for more. sorry but being a baby factory doesn't qualify you to be vice president</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">delmar</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 16:06:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Palin-Couric interview (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/palin_couric_interview_scripting_news/#comment-2629963</link><description>vapid. absolutely vapid.  i don't want to jump ugly on palin but c'mon, this is the best that the republican party can offer? she's a ninny....</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">delmar</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 15:21:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Much Money Does It Take To Be A TechCrunch50 Finalist?</title><link>http://sproutly.disqus.com/how_much_money_does_it_take_to_be_a_techcrunch50_finalist_53/#comment-2334761</link><description>you're joking, right. "cream of the cream?" gimme a break. most of the products aren't even ready yet. for my $$$, i'll go with demo</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">delmar</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 22:40:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Humanize Microsoft? That&amp;#8217;s impossible!</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/humanize_microsoft_that8217s_impossible/#comment-2328268</link><description>i think you miss the point of the apple ads. despite the cult affectation - especially the obsession among the web 2.0/techmeme echo chamber - fact is that apple's share of market remains puny. to the degree that the ads trumpet the mac's technical prowess - and convinces more "switchers" - then it's all to apples advantage. i'm reserving judgment on the effectiveness of the microsoft/seinfield bits. most of the commentary posing as analysis on the marketing campaign are simply premature, imho</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">delmar</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 11:56:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Palin on the Bush Doctrine -- Political Wire</title><link>http://politicalwire.disqus.com/palin_on_the_bush_doctrine_political_wire/#comment-2294529</link><description>no, you're quite wrong about that. the 2002 document was a sharp break with US postwar foreign policy. it's not a question of "hey, we'll reply militarily to anyone who attacks us." this was a detailed document worked up to justify pre-emption. iraq, you may recall was only a year away at the time.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;go look up the document. it's online&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;she's a frigging amateur. and mccain expects us to remain sanguine that she'd be a heartbeat away from the presidency?  oh, yeah; i almost forgot: she's a "hockey mom." well, i guess she's qualified for the job then</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">delmar</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 20:54:08 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>