<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for daveinboca</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/daveinboca/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:40:31 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Report: U.S. Intelligence Agencies Knew Hasan Was Trying To Contact Al Qaeda</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/report_us_intelligence_agencies_knew_hasan_was_trying_to_contact_al_qaeda/#comment-22466202</link><description>As for the CIA, I seem to recall that that same agency neglected to inform the FBI of the arrival in San Diego in 2000 of three of the major perps of 9/11 because of some sort of turf battle, which the imposition of a "firewall" between the two agencies imposed in the mid '90s had facilitated.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The CIA loves to keep its little intel nuggets to itself lest the FBI actually take action on actionable intelligence. [I worked extensively with the  CIA  overseas during two assignments in the FS and a bit with the FBI after 9/11.]&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Another eff-up by the Feds, which seem to distribute their colossal mess-ups between the feckless FB( and the cockamamie CIA, regardless of who is POTUS.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;[BTW, the Morrissey article linked to this post blames the FBI, perhaps erroneously, given that the CIA would have been monitoring the communications to Al Qaeda from overseas in the normal order of business.  The reluctance of the CIA to divulge its intel with the FBI I mentioned above.]</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daveinboca</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:40:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Price for Health Care Reform: Poor Women&amp;#8217;s Health</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/the_price_for_health_care_reform_poor_women8217s_health/#comment-22247462</link><description>I agree with Leonidas, dave....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I disagree with Kat 99.9% of the time (until she wisens up and uses better logic - tee hee).&lt;br&gt;But to call her an unnatural creature is uncalled for.  Let's keep it civil, bro.&lt;br&gt;You should apologize.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JeffersonDavis</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 11:13:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Price for Health Care Reform: Poor Women&amp;#8217;s Health</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/the_price_for_health_care_reform_poor_women8217s_health/#comment-22246938</link><description>Dave, I respect your right to an opinion and I fall somewhere between your view and Kathy's.  I', pro-abortion up to the point where a mental synapse is possible for the fetus, the point at which I see human life as starting, then I become pro-life.  However, I cannot condone your reference to Kathy as an "unnatural creature" anymore than I could condone her saying the same of you.  This label is uncalled for, and I think you should rephrase it.  I would have no problem had you said "an overly partisan progressive  creature", but she is no more unnatural than you are.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Leonidas</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 10:56:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cable News Ratings During Ft. Hood Breaking News - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://tvnewser.disqus.com/cable_news_ratings_during_ft_hood_breaking_news_mediabistrocom_tvnewser/#comment-22241180</link><description>DrElephant---The libtard cadres must have been whining to SNL about the many put-downs of Dear Leader and the DNCTV types---last night they had an unfunny put-down of Greta Van and also had a View put-down of Elizabeth Hasselbeck, so the flak-catchers must have been heavily mau-maued over the last few weeks.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;SNL put-downs of Barney eFF and Mad Queen Nancy are even better than their Dear Leader slams.   Sadly, the Fox send-up wasn't even close enough to the real thing to be recognizable.   And The Daily Show and Colbert are trying to outdo themselves in Glenn Beck parodies.   &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of course, Stewart might be whistling past the graveyard a bit, although Colbert is still trying [sometimes] to be even-handed in his slams...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No use making fun of MS...oops, DNCTV.   It's not watched enough to even rate with the unwatched PBS Bill Moyers' weekly agitprop three-minute hates.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daveinboca</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 08:40:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cable News Ratings During Ft. Hood Breaking News - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://tvnewser.disqus.com/cable_news_ratings_during_ft_hood_breaking_news_mediabistrocom_tvnewser/#comment-22240916</link><description>Fox uses the correct term of "Muslim terrorist" and doesn't condescend to their viewers as does CNN and the unwatched MSNBC.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Fox haters are grinding their teeth down to tiny nubs by now!  Evening cable ratings consistently have them surpassing all other primetime cable news "outlets" which peddle PC drivel by more than the rest combined, not counting Glenn Beck who outdraws everybody but Oprah and would surpass her if he were on a primetime slot.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daveinboca</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 08:29:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Price for Health Care Reform: Poor Women&amp;#8217;s Health</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/the_price_for_health_care_reform_poor_women8217s_health/#comment-22237307</link><description>Infanticide is murder, no matter what the "law" of the land is.   There is such a thing as the Natural Law, and unnatural creatures like KKattenburg cannot be expected to understand this.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daveinboca</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 06:16:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Fox In The Hen House</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/the_fox_in_the_hen_house/#comment-22081562</link><description>FoxNEWS has broken numerous stories of incompetence,malfeasance, and downright corruption by this White House and points out frequently its ridiculous mistatements for the outright lies that they are.   Having worked for a few PR firms, for some news organizations and also having worked in political campaigns, it's easy to see that MSNBC is a PR firm for the DNC, and the three old-time networks are also almost always repeating DNC talking points.   CNN gives less slavish adulation to the Obama Chicago-style political machine.   Fox does point out absurd statements by Obama such as his claiming to be unaware that ACORN was receiving government funds [he was a counselor and advisor to ACORN for several years during the nineties] while the PR cable &amp; nets accept every mistatement &amp; outright lie, as the ACORN statement above was, at face value.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks, Austin, for pointing out this FEC policized law case.   It seems that the old "tyranny of the majority" might not be around for long, though.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daveinboca</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 23:32:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Olbermann, Hannity Get Along at World Series - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://tvnewser.disqus.com/olbermann_hannity_get_along_at_world_series_mediabistrocom_tvnewser/#comment-22011875</link><description>A little like pro wrestling, I guess, with all the sound and fury signifying a BIG FAT NOTHING.   Although Sean is more polite, and Keith-O not exactly big on the politesse, I guess their manners reflect their constituencies/viewerships.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daveinboca</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 23:47:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Conservatives Rework Rhetoric After Loss in NY Special</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.disqus.com/conservatives_rework_rhetoric_after_loss_in_ny_special/#comment-21949820</link><description>I have to disagree. A minimum of 30% of the district would have voted for a napkin if it was in the race as a Republican. Almost no one who would have voted for Owens switched to Hoffman when Scozzafava left the race, but apparently quite a few who would have voted for Scozzafava changed to Owens. In all likelyhood Scozzafava would have won, with every vote Hoffman got plus some that Owens got. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hoffman didn't need name recognition in such a staunchly Republican area, he just needed to pull a few votes from the undecided column and that is where it all fell apart. Losing a district that is more than 50% Republican is a loss for Rebublicans/ win for Democrats. Hoffman did what no Republican in 100 years has managed, lose.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">noisyrhysling</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 11:56:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Conservatives Rework Rhetoric After Loss in NY Special</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.disqus.com/conservatives_rework_rhetoric_after_loss_in_ny_special/#comment-21929025</link><description>Deborah Feyerick of CNN had it right.  Hoffmann came from zero-name recognition and single-digit poll numbers in the last month to almost pulling off a victory, losing by a whisker to a combo of a corrupt Repub RINO [who siphoned off the 5%  Hoffmann needed to win] and a Dem Plattsburgh lawyer with 85% out-of-district funding.   CNN isn't usually in the vanguard of political analysis, but Debbie got this one right.   She noted that the Blue Dogs across the country will take another hard look because of Hoffmann's experience.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nancy P. is suffering from advanced dementia, or perhaps botox side-effects, when she calls yesterday a win for Democrats.  If she'd graduated from high school, she might have heard of a Pyhrric victory.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daveinboca</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 05:57:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NY-23: 95 Percent of Hoffman Cash From Out of District</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.disqus.com/ny_23_95_percent_of_hoffman_cash_from_out_of_district/#comment-21771381</link><description>You use a lot of words incorrectly.  You are clearly very unintelligent.  Please be less stupid in future posts.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brendanm</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 12:56:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NY-23: 95 Percent of Hoffman Cash From Out of District</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.disqus.com/ny_23_95_percent_of_hoffman_cash_from_out_of_district/#comment-21743471</link><description>Actually, it would be interesting to make an attempt at journalism, which is evidently forbidden at this fishwrap for leftist boondoggles, and find out how much from  Owens' [who is incidentally a Plattsburgh lawyer who is also a "carpetbagger" in the terms employed by the fishwrappers here] contributors comes from out of district, or even out of state.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When Dear Leader sends his resident court jester up to Watertown, you know that it's tight-sphincter time in the Oval Office and Environs.  How much cred will happy Joe have if Hoffmann wins after he can't fill a school hall and CNN calls him "Former Vice President Biden?"</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daveinboca</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 03:33:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NY-23: &amp;#8216;No Right Wing! No Right Wing!&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.disqus.com/ny_23_8216no_right_wing_no_right_wing8217/#comment-21743325</link><description>"Former Vice President Biden" as the CNN file from upstate-NY calls him, might be on the outs with Dear Leader Brobambi, the way it looks.   He can't fill a hall that holds 500 people and the so-called DNC candidate Owens is a lawyer from Plattsburgh, which makes him a "carbetbagger" too.  Being sent to Watertown in a losing cause is no way to increase the cred of a clown who routinely steps in it whenever he opens his mouth.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daveinboca</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 03:23:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dede Scozzafava</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/dede_scozzafava/#comment-21497662</link><description>The latest Pew poll shows that Pro-Lifers now outnumber abortion supporters.   Does that mean that in the funhouse mirror you use to make what Jazz rightly notices are off-the-wall pronouncements that the majority of those polled are "far right?"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You are far beyond pathetic.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And I find it hilarious that a Trotskyite like Frank Rich would call the GOP "Stalinists." Coming from insane lefty Rich, he's obviously reverting to the lizard-brain playground reflexes that rule leftist memes in general, only the Hitler meme and racist meme are now too shopworn!  "Stalinist" may be the new HIlterian!  Or the new "racist."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For a &lt;i&gt;Narodnik&lt;/i&gt; like Rich to call the GOP Stalinist makes about as much sense as calling effective border measures against illegal immigration a "Berlin Wall."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Leftists who call JFK's Commie assassin LHOswald a "right winger" might remember that the "Berlin Wall" served to keep workers INSIDE the Commie "workers' paradise."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The US anti-immigration measures are to keep undesirables OUTSIDE the USA.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;Mutatis mutandis,&lt;/i&gt; thimblewit Rich should call the GOP "rightists," which to the Trotskyite world view of revolutionaries like Rich are to the "right" of their own anarchic half-wit politics.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daveinboca</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 01:43:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lieberman Intends to Filibuster HCR With Public Option</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/lieberman_intends_to_filibuster_hcr_with_public_option/#comment-21180504</link><description>The Republicans have come up with policy alternatives.  You simply haven't bothered to even check them out.   And your specious comment about supporting criminals like Chavez and Ortega, and the Honduran wannabe?  Nobody has to support them.    And just which "right-wing dictators" are the Republicans now supporting?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Get serious.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daveinboca</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 11:22:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NY-23: Club for Growth Poll Has Hoffman Leading</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.disqus.com/ny_23_club_for_growth_poll_has_hoffman_leading/#comment-21067697</link><description>Most Tea Party people I know in FL in a wide range of social contacts are not for Crisp, a certifiable RINO.   Many of them are Blue Dog Dems or Independents like myself, and relatively few voted for RINO McCain without holding their nose.   &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The choice between Dems and Repubs is usually between Tweedledumb and Tweedledumber, with the T-dumber depending on location and context.   Sen. Nelson, for instance, has a single-digit IQ despite being a former astronaut----braindeath occurred perhaps prematurely in his case.   I voted against Jeb Bush for Gov &amp; for the Dem in '02, e.g., so every case has its unique circumstances.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daveinboca</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:24:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MSNBC Anchor Introduces Rev. Al Sharpton When She's Really Interviewing Rev. Jesse Jackson - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://tvnewser.disqus.com/msnbc_anchor_introduces_rev_al_sharpton_when_shes_really_interviewing_rev_jesse_jackson_mediabistroc/#comment-20772384</link><description>Brewer famously did show the Town Hall attendee with an assault rifle and the picture was purposely cropped to hide the fact that the fellow with the gun was a conservative black.   Brewer is such a shallow moron that she and  Ric Sanchez over at CNN should hook up and start another balloon boy family.  I'm sure the teleprompter said Sharpton too, but this double-digit IQ airhead BS'd her way out of the situation.  It's the teddavids of the population who are walking, talking brainfarts without any critical intellect and I doubt TD even knows what a critical intellect is.   Nobody on MSNBC certainly has one.  Ditto CNN with Lou Dobbs perhaps the lone exception that proves the rule.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daveinboca</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 04:45:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The White House&amp;#8217;s Curious War Against Fox News (Guest Voice)</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/the_white_house8217s_curious_war_against_fox_news_guest_voice/#comment-20751754</link><description>My dream come true will begin to happen in the 2010 elections when the decks will begin to hit the icy water for the &lt;i&gt;Dreams of My Alcoholic Bigamist Daddy&lt;/i&gt; POTUS.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daveinboca</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 20:15:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The White House&amp;#8217;s Curious War Against Fox News (Guest Voice)</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/the_white_house8217s_curious_war_against_fox_news_guest_voice/#comment-20704248</link><description>Enjoy your fantasy dave. ;-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JSpencer</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:06:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The White House&amp;#8217;s Curious War Against Fox News (Guest Voice)</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/the_white_house8217s_curious_war_against_fox_news_guest_voice/#comment-20678576</link><description>WH neophytes are now panicking is that Obama's poll numbers, even in the manipulated Post/ABC skewed attempt to alter reality, are sinking like a Titanic---Gibbs and Dunn are simply band members on the deck playing to keep the gullibles thinking the water ain't that cold where they're headed shortly to a one-term presidency.    Dunn's idiocy in particular convinces only the choir---and of these, only the slowest members. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama is an iteration of Jimmy Carter, with history repeating this time as farce.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daveinboca</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 00:24:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: RNC Mail Suggests Republicans Could Be Discriminated Against, Lose Their Health Care</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.disqus.com/rnc_mail_suggests_republicans_could_be_discriminated_against_lose_their_health_care/#comment-19945880</link><description>sorry Dave, I was away.  No way was TK the worst Senator.  As John McCain said '</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jjfitz</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 23:47:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Left, Tom Delay and Dancing With The Stars</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/the_left_tom_delay_and_dancing_with_the_stars/#comment-19371993</link><description>For a guy his age, he was just fine and the GOP on the back of his shirt showed a sense of humor, something lacking in the self-anointed elites [and out-and-out crooks like Rangel and Murtha] on the other side.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daveinboca</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:06:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Applebaum: I am not my husband&amp;#8217;s keeper</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/applebaum_i_am_not_my_husband8217s_keeper/#comment-17815441</link><description>Green Dreams, I got my two cents worth on slightly off-topic thrown off this subject for diverging onto ACORN,  Obama &amp; support of child-pedophile immigration.  So if what's sauce for the goose, etc., etc.   Saddam had special rape rooms for women who were lined up to meet the Prime Minister &amp; he selected the lucky recipients behind a one-way mirror.   Thought at first that's what you were referring to.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daveinboca</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 22:15:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: President Obama: Restoring Chain-Of-Command</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/president_obama_restoring_chain_of_command/#comment-17741165</link><description>McChrystal was named as McKiernan's replacement more than a year ahead of schedule.  That must have been at Petraeus's recommendation.   &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Of course he is a smart President, but to be fair, the act that he follows is really not much competition in the smarts department." is not only off-topic, but inaccurate, as the guts to go with Petraeus with the Surge was against nearly unanimous opposition.  Opposition which had effusively supported his earlier Operation Cobra II.  Until the going got rough.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But as a participant in the SouthEastAsian War Games, I can recall when LBJ would talk daily to Westmoreland, as would GHWB often do to Gen. Schwartzkopf where I also was in the war zone.  As TSteele says, it's a matter of style with Obama, and he has other fish to fry, but he'd better watch out or he'll get into a situation where he tries to do it on the cheap, and as Cobra II indicates, that can be disastrous.  Strange that Hillary Clinton should voice her opinion about Gen. McChrystal, and totally inappropriate.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daveinboca</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:05:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Roman Polanski: Scumbag</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/roman_polanski_scumbag/#comment-17732787</link><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Obama says he was unaware...&lt;/blockquote&gt;daveinboca is trying to hijack this thread... it seems that has become his standard (one-and-only?) M.O.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SteveK</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:24:02 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>