<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for dansumption</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-8cac8054" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/dansumption/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 23:04:18 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Nokia Siemens Networks accuses me of bias toward Nokia</title><link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/10/nokia-siemens-networks-accuses-me-of-bias-toward-nokia.html#comment-20822500</link><description>Bit confused here - you say you've been accused of bias *toward* Nokia, but it sounds from the article as though you've actually been accused of bias *against* Nokia.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dansumption</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 23:04:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How far have we come?</title><link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/08/how-far-have-we-come-2.html#comment-15401270</link><description>I showed my HTC Hero's photo app to the 11-month old baby we're fostering: drag down on the screen and the photos is pulled down, to be replaced by another one. She got it instantly, and spent ages doing it herself. Finally phone interfaces are becoming intuitive.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dansumption</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 00:03:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thursday night at Leo Burnett&amp;#8217;s</title><link>http://www.sumption.org/2001/04/30/thursday-night-at-leo-burnetts/#comment-14620399</link><description>Oh yeah, I also kept up my end of a conference call from underneath the desk the following day, without the party on the other end (Morgan Stanley's American global branding team) being any the wiser.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dansumption</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 03:24:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Treacle Song, Radio 3</title><link>http://www.sumption.org/2009/07/01/treacle-song-radio-3/#comment-12805417</link><description>Hmm, seems I'm being invaded by interesting spam-bots. It's enough to loose [sic] my heart.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dansumption</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 05:14:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Treacle Song, Radio 3</title><link>http://www.sumption.org/2009/07/01/treacle-song-radio-3/#comment-11979285</link><description>Very good, but "ohne" means without, not "one" - I feel this&lt;br&gt;fundamentally undermines your analysis.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, I seem to remember that I spent ages dithering over "cooking&lt;br&gt;chocolate" vs "cook's chocolate", before settling on "cook chocolate".&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2009/7/1 Disqus &amp;lt;&amp;gt;:</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dansumption</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 10:54:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Improvised off-camera flash technique</title><link>http://www.sumption.org/2007/03/07/improvised-off-camera-flash-technique/#comment-7746037</link><description>Haha, you guessed it Yoshi. I always have to have a hand free for my bottle of beer!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dansumption</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 12:22:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sue Schofield</title><link>http://www.sumption.org/2009/03/24/sue-schofield/#comment-7465093</link><description>What was WAIS? Don't think II eveir useid thait oine.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dansumption</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 08:16:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ITV gave me my BBC Micro</title><link>http://www.sumption.org/2009/01/21/itv-gave-me-my-bbc-micro/#comment-5425642</link><description>For my first two or three years at secondary school, we only had one machine between approx. 1,000 pupils (a Research Machines). Us "computer club" members used to take turns every lunchtime to sit in the office and type in programs.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Usually of the variety that ended with:&lt;br&gt;20 GOTO 10</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dansumption</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 05:44:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter is brilliant, brilliant, brilliant for famous people</title><link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/01/twitter_is_brilliant_brilliant_brilliant_for_famous_people.html#comment-5009887</link><description>Yes, spot on. Turns out you *do* get it (though I still say there's a lot more to Twitter than celebs defending themselves against the media).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's been very interesting following @wossy's comments on the Daily Mail.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dansumption</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 06:34:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My arse with Twitter. Help.</title><link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/12/my_arse_with_twitter_help.html#comment-4964206</link><description>Yes, you're missing the point. And you should probably use an app like Tweetdeck or a site like Tweetree to get the context that you're missing.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dansumption</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 13:23:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: London</title><link>http://www.sumption.org/2007/08/21/london/#comment-4875526</link><description>NB "Lions are drinking" is a term used by London boatmen, for times when the tide is so high that it reaches the lions on London's Embankment.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dansumption</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 00:47:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Iomega drive on last legs</title><link>http://www.ewan.net/2008/11/29/iomega-drive-on-last-legs/#comment-7211189</link><description>I've never bought another Iomega product since the nightmare that was zip drives, 12 years ago. We had so many of them, had so many crashes, and lost *so* much data (inluding most of the websites I worked on during my first couple of years online) that I will never, ever, ever trust that company again.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dansumption</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 01:01:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NokiaWorldWatch: The 8 megapixel question – where are the handsets Nokia?</title><link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/12/nokiaworldwatch_the_8_megapixel_question_where_are_the_handsets_nokia.html#comment-4198245</link><description>There's a fourth factor, more important than processing software and directly related to the lens: sensor size. Trends towards thinner mobiles mean that lens and sensor can only get worse, and even 5Mp is pushing beyond the number of photons that a mobile's tiny sensor can reliably pick up. 8Mp phone cameras are purely a marketing gimmick and, like Nokia says, will actually produce worse images than 5Mp ones. All credit to Nokia for bucking the trend and aiming for real quality rather than just easily-marketable headline figures.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dansumption</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 23:47:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FAD  &amp;raquo; Blog Archive   &amp;raquo; Time Out&amp;#8217;s New Street artists to watch</title><link>http://www.fadwebsite.com/2008/11/29/time-outs-new-street-artists-to-watch/#comment-4201722</link><description>Wot, no Kid Acne?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dansumption</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 05:35:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bitten by a Police Dog</title><link>http://www.sumption.org/2006/06/29/bitten-by-a-police-dog/#comment-4200823</link><description>No need for an attorney - I'm not dead yet.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dansumption</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 19:10:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bitten by a Police Dog</title><link>http://www.sumption.org/2006/06/29/bitten-by-a-police-dog/#comment-4200825</link><description>I wanted to sue, but left it too late - I'd heard that you had 3 years to act in, but apparently the original complaint needs to come in the first year.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dansumption</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 05:25:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;Who&amp;#8221; do you think you are using that RAZR camera?</title><link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/10/who_do_you_think_you_are_using_that_razr_camera.html#comment-3274453</link><description>Anyone know where my comment went?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dansumption</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 10:12:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;Who&amp;#8221; do you think you are using that RAZR camera?</title><link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/10/who_do_you_think_you_are_using_that_razr_camera.html#comment-3262818</link><description>"So what makes people think this tiny little, what does a RAZR have, 1.2 megapixels on a good day?"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Your photos above are 500x375 pixels - I make that less than 0.2 megapixels. Sure, they were more than that when you took them, but posting them at 0.2 megapixels doesn't do much for your point.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My first digital camera was 2 megapixels, but I only ever used it at 1.2 megapixels because 2mp photos took too long to write to the card. I've printed those photos at up to A4 and I bet they look better than anything you could produce with your N95.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Pixel dimensions are pretty much meaningless unless you're going to print at over A4 - lenses and sensors are what count. As mobile companies try to squeeze more pixels onto ever smaller sensors at shorter focal lengths, the picture is only likely to get worse. Never mind the marketing, do the physics! If I used a mobile-phone-sized camera, I really wouldn't want it to do more than about 2mp.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dansumption</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 17:07:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BBC iPlayer on the N95</title><link>http://www.smstextnews.com/2008/10/bbc_iplayer_on_the_n95.html#comment-2981088</link><description>Oh, and more here:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/bbcinternet/2008/10/bbc_iplayer_on_n95_update.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/bbcinternet/2008/10/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Love those BBC Internet blogs!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dansumption</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 11:53:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BBC iPlayer on the N95</title><link>http://www.smstextnews.com/2008/10/bbc_iplayer_on_the_n95.html#comment-2936976</link><description>Hi Ewan,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We're working on making iPlayer content available on as wide a range of devices as possible - see here for more details:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/bbcinternet/2008/10/bbc_iplayer_goes_portable.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/bbcinternet/2008/10/...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dansumption</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 10:52:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Swiss Institute New York Presents RACHEL MASON // THE TERRESTRIAL BEING</title><link>http://www.fadwebsite.com/2008/08/11/swiss-institute-new-york-presents-rachel-mason-the-terrestrial-being/#comment-4201632</link><description>Terrestrial being? Stig, more like.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dansumption</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 16:30:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Russell Herron Picks of the week</title><link>http://www.fadwebsite.com/2008/03/12/russell-herron-picks-of-the-week/#comment-4201561</link><description>Yay!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dansumption</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:20:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Acolytes Action Squad</title><link>http://www.sumption.org/2008/02/10/acolytes-action-squad/#comment-4201020</link><description>Lightroom pisses all over GIMP!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Gizmo missed you :(</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dansumption</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:37:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mouse-wobbling blobby things</title><link>http://www.sumption.org/2008/01/21/mouse-wobbling-blobby-things/#comment-4201017</link><description>Mozaz, yer a fuckin' nutter!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dansumption</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 06:36:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Canon EOS 40D &amp;#8220;user modes&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://www.sumption.org/2007/09/25/canon-eos-40d-user-modes/#comment-4201003</link><description>I think depends largely on what kind of events you are shooting - for outdoor events, the light will probably change so much from time-to-time and place-to-place that I would probably leave it in manual mode and work from there, perhaps flicking onto a user mode on the odd occasions when I want to use flash. But most of the events I shoot are in darkened nightclubs or similar venues, where I take a combination of atmospheric shots using the club's lighting (and usually 1600 or 3200ISO) and portraits using bright flash combined with long exposure for background-fill (usually at around 160-400 ISO).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dansumption</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 08:36:19 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>