<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for daddysteve</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-e11df28a" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/daddysteve/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 21:42:18 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Friday Afternoon Is Bad News Time</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2008/09/friday-afternoo.html#comment-12183719</link><description>It's a good thing people are beginning to realize that both parties are to blame for most of our problems.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daddysteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 21:42:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Economist: Culver engaging in ‘budgetary hocus pocus’</title><link>http://iowaindependent.com/?p=16994#comment-12016345</link><description>Tax revenue will fall short this year. What a surprise. The "experts" that didn't see all this coming probably just need more power.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daddysteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 23:01:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: As climate change bill moves forward, Boswell remains skeptical</title><link>http://iowaindependent.com/16571/as-climate-change-bill-moves-forward-boswell-remains-skeptical#comment-11863213</link><description>Bruce Braley is a political whore but I suspect his yes vote on this matter won't harm his credibility any more than selling out on the TARP legislation for 4 billion more in Iowa pork. And he won't sign on to the bill to audit the FED. He's one of the biggest party-liners in congress. I thought Iowans were smarter than average but I am mystified at this mans staying power.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daddysteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 18:30:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barbour: GOP must resist quest for purity</title><link>http://iowaindependent.com/16800/barbour-gop-must-resist-quest-for-purity#comment-11863018</link><description>Gay marriage and abortion? Is this what's bringing down America? I realize there is little else to distinguish republicans from democrats but still...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daddysteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 18:19:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Grassley proposes flag-burning amendment</title><link>http://iowaindependent.com/?p=14889#comment-9183942</link><description>12,000,000,000,000 national debt and rising. I'm sure this is the kind of legislation we need at this point in time. Both parties are totally irresponsible.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daddysteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 13:20:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Public employee union vows to work on cost savings</title><link>http://iowaindependent.com/11034/public-employee-union-vows-to-work-on-cost-savings#comment-5662162</link><description>So all the financial problems are the fault of Bush? That statement is ridiculous. Political intervention from both parties fostered Wall St. greed and a herd mentality. The result was a belief that houses and stocks would always rise in value. Once again, reality rears it's ugly head. Now the unions, just like the bankers and their political buddies, are going to fight it with every dollar your grandkids will ever have.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daddysteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:24:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2010 GOP gubernatorial prospects begin &amp;#8216;trial balloon&amp;#8217; phase of campaign</title><link>http://iowaindependent.com/10959/2010-gop-gubernatorial-prospects-begin-trial-balloon-phase-of-campaign#comment-5661871</link><description>And how disappointing the GOP was on this issue. Culver seems to be taking a pretty conservative stance on budget cuts, though, which is good. Did I just say that about a democrat? I guess it's just talk so far.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daddysteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:13:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Culver defends his budget-balancing act</title><link>http://iowaindependent.com/?p=10977#comment-5661627</link><description>Cutting taxes and government spending will hurt the economy? What??? I'm hardly a Chet Culver fan but at least he understands Econ 101.If losing some government employees is going to seriously affect the economy then there are too many govt' employees. As hard-hearted as it may sound, these workers don't create wealth,their paychecks come from someone who did. Taxes and spending should have been cut long ago when we began losing our industrial base but the only tax cuts were for moving the jobs overseas. Better late than never but probably already too late.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daddysteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:04:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quad City alt-weekly switches to bi-weekly</title><link>http://iowaindependent.com/10676/quad-city-alt-weekly-switches-to-bi-weekly#comment-5409093</link><description>Go River Cities Reader! The only paper I read regularly. No "corporate news" here.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daddysteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:37:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Right-wing bloggers respond to Krishna</title><link>http://iowaindependent.com/?p=10347#comment-4974124</link><description>"Not open to the public or media".  Sadly typical.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daddysteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 22:33:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Iowa GOP still sinking, says party treasurer</title><link>http://iowaindependent.com/10300/iowa-gop-still-sinking-says-party-treasurer#comment-4973411</link><description>I have yet to find a reason to keep my republican voter card.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daddysteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 21:38:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who will lead the Iowa GOP?</title><link>http://iowaindependent.com/9347/who-will-lead-state-gop-carroll-reed-among-candidates#comment-4528912</link><description>Ask the local Ron Paulers about how the republican party follows it's own bylaws. What a joke.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daddysteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 15:34:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Soul-searching Iowa GOP looks to lurch right</title><link>http://iowaindependent.com/?p=8453#comment-3906464</link><description>If these conservatives think "social" conservatism is going to bring people back to the fold then good luck to them. Makes for good "us against them" politics, though.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daddysteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 21:46:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Red vs. Blue &amp;#8212; Iowa edition</title><link>http://iowaindependent.com/?p=8361#comment-3726808</link><description>So, who's ahead, US or THEM.  The republicrats are firmly entrenched in our state.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daddysteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 22:04:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Harkin: When it comes to Lieberman, maybe it&amp;#8217;s better to &amp;#8216;forgive and forget&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://iowaindependent.com/8209/harkin-when-it-comes-to-lieberman-maybe-its-better-to-forgive-and-forget#comment-3671000</link><description>That politicians want you to "forget" is something you can be sure of.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daddysteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 19:29:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ballot challenges could shift election</title><link>http://iowaindependent.com/?p=7955#comment-3461258</link><description>Don't worry, vote republicrat. Our grandchildren can pick up the tab. 10 or 11 trillion is nothing compared with the thrill of voting for the "winner".</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daddysteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 16:01:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tone of legislative campaign turns negative</title><link>http://iowaindependent.com/?p=8001#comment-3461069</link><description>Politics as usual. That's sure to help us in the tough times ahead.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daddysteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 15:50:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Press-Citizen endorses Harkin</title><link>http://iowaindependent.com/7697/press-citizen-endorses-harkin#comment-3350220</link><description>200 billion? ouch.  I see part of the problem with prices in the grocery store. This has to be driving up prices for foodstuffs.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daddysteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:31:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rolling the dice on Iowa</title><link>http://iowaindependent.com/7471/rolling-the-dice-on-iowa#comment-3285544</link><description>My prediction '08.  Republicrats win in a landslide.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daddysteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 18:12:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reed calls Harkin &amp;#8216;Tokyo Rose of al Qaida&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://iowaindependent.com/?p=7444#comment-3285501</link><description>If not Harkin or Reed then who?  Bigger government or warmongering. What a choice. Reed sure turned me off with that crap.  Like Harkin doesn't have enough negatives, Reed has to spout this neocon drivel? Sadly, this is likely to garner many more republican votes than pushing "Ron Paul" fiscal responsibility. As for the democrats,  everything seems to be coming up roses. Yip-f@#$king- eee</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daddysteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 18:08:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are Reed and Hartsuch being &amp;#8220;triaged out&amp;#8221;?</title><link>http://iowaindependent.com/?p=6941#comment-3073835</link><description>Vote out the incumbents !  Harkin , Grassley and Braley are all responsible for the mess we are in. They all advocate policies that will make the situation worse. Elect someone ( anyone ) that has the economic expertise of somebody like Ron Paul. I will be glad to vote for a fiscal conservative like &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hartsuch  over the sell-out Braley.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daddysteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 14:42:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hubler: Train financial anger on King, GOP</title><link>http://iowaindependent.com/6885/hubler-train-financial-anger-on-king-gop#comment-3032143</link><description>The Council Bluffs Democrat says the “total free market” and “deregulation” approach to governing from the Republicans has resulted in the current financial crisis. WHAT??  Show me a free market anywhere on this planet.  The "regulation" needed is TRANSPARENCY.  Make the banks disclose the crap on their books and make them value this garbage fairly. Banks (et al) don't trust each other and won't lend because they are all hiding this junk and the suspension of "mark to market" accounting will certainly exacerbate the mistrust. If this is the best opinion on economics that Hubler can come up with then he's ignorant or,more likely, pandering to the clueless voter. And ,of course, the ultimate blame lies with the clueless voters.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daddysteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 20:49:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Loebsack backs bailout with reluctance</title><link>http://iowaindependent.com/6749/loebsack-backs-bailout-with-reluctance#comment-2973990</link><description>No part of this problem lies with congress, Mr. Loebsack?  That this problem comes as a surprise is hard to believe with the amount of information available and even discussed in the House (ala Ron Paul ) months and even years ago.  That these problems weren't dealt with in a timely fashion is a condemnation of BOTH major political parties. Look at the biggest contributors to either major candidate. The same names we've been seeing daily in the financials. Smells like "conflict of interest" to me. Or what's called lobbying these days.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daddysteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 22:56:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Iowa Dems support bailout, GOP continues opposition</title><link>http://iowaindependent.com/6542/iowa-dems-support-bailout-gop-continues-opposition#comment-2869136</link><description>So it takes 4.6 bil. to buy Braley. He's certainly not cheap but he's still a whore. I definitely regret sending him a thank you letter after his no vote on monday.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daddysteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 19:18:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Grassley, Harkin support bailout bill</title><link>http://iowaindependent.com/6460/grassley-harkin-support-bailout-bill#comment-2811591</link><description>Our senators say "Put enough pork in my sh%t sandwich and I'll give every Iowan a BIG bite".</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daddysteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 18:53:39 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>