<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Rob S</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/dab16102353ea7fd255f4d82bb093af0/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Sep 2006 11:37:16 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Shorter Podcasts or Two Hosts Isn&amp;#8217;t Newsworthy</title><link>http://virtualeventsuccess.disqus.com/shorter_podcasts_or_two_hosts_isn8217t_newsworthy/#comment-22801629</link><description>Most podcasting "news" is worthless. I follow press releases and news reports on podcasting and I rarely ever see a newsworthy item. I commented as such a few months ago on my blog here: &lt;a href="http://www.podcastnyc.net/blog/2006/05/new-rules-of-podcasting-part-iii.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.podcastnyc.net/blog/2006/05/new-rule...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rob S</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 11:52:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: further evidence that PR and control are a bad mix</title><link>http://marketingbeginsathome.disqus.com/further_evidence_that_pr_and_control_are_a_bad_mix/#comment-4679090</link><description>How ridiculous. It reminds me of an episode of the show Curb Your Enthusiasm where a newspaper really messes up an obituary. Just another example of why it pays to be detail oriented in the world of published media.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rob S</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2005 13:11:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Geek dinner continued</title><link>http://marketingbeginsathome.disqus.com/geek_dinner_continued/#comment-4679096</link><description>David,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It was nice meeting you at the dinner. As an expectant father, you can be sure that I'll be subscribing to both blogs.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rob S</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2005 12:38:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2006/07/01/blubrry-launches-new-podcast-directory/</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/thread_571/#comment-5896808</link><description>Couldn't disagree more with the post. The concept of Blubrry is not for podcasters to drop a link and run. It's about bringing in quality podcasters who want to build something from the ground up.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As such they're not looking to pull in an OPML feed and call it a day. What would be the point of that? iTunes already rules as the king of directories.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rob S</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 16:42:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PodTech&amp;#8217;s content and Web site challenges</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/podtech8217s_content_and_web_site_challenges/#comment-9642443</link><description>Geez. I didn't mean to start a whole post on your blog Robert.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I like to hear people reporting tech stuff in a more passionate way. When I listen to (or watch) podcasts I'm motivated by the host's motivation and the fact that the opinions are unfiltered. Otherwise I might as well be reading copy on the websites of the companies that are talking on PodTech.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As I said in my post I look forward to hearing (and seeing) what's new with PodTech when you start exerting your might influence on the efforts taking place there.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rob S</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Jun 2006 20:23:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will Apple sue PodTech.net? (My employer)</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/will_apple_sue_podtechnet_my_employer/#comment-9654504</link><description>Forget changing the name. Let's rain down jeers on the Apple Representative who accepts the Directory of the Year award at the Podcast Expo this coming Friday night.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rob S</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 Sep 2006 11:37:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Shorter Podcasts or Two Hosts Isn&amp;#8217;t Newsworthy</title><link>http://marketingfit.disqus.com/shorter_podcasts_or_two_hosts_isn8217t_newsworthy/#comment-13647247</link><description>Most podcasting "news" is worthless. I follow press releases and news reports on podcasting and I rarely ever see a newsworthy item. I commented as such a few months ago on my blog here: &lt;a href="http://www.podcastnyc.net/blog/2006/05/new-rules-of-podcasting-part-iii.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.podcastnyc.net/blog/2006/05/new-rule...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rob S</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 11:52:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Shorter Podcasts or Two Hosts Isn&amp;#8217;t Newsworthy</title><link>http://marketingfit.disqus.com/shorter_podcasts_or_two_hosts_isn8217t_newsworthy_86/#comment-20601567</link><description>Most podcasting "news" is worthless. I follow press releases and news reports on podcasting and I rarely ever see a newsworthy item. I commented as such a few months ago on my blog here: &lt;a href="http://www.podcastnyc.net/blog/2006/05/new-rules-of-podcasting-part-iii.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.podcastnyc.net/blog/2006/05/new-rule...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rob S</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 11:52:28 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>