DISQUS

DISQUS Hello!  The comments on this profile are unclaimed and thus are unverified.

Do they belong to you? Claim these comments.

Luv2Box's picture

Unregistered

Feeds

aliases

  • Luv2Box

Luv2Box

3 years ago

in Brooklyn Bridge for Sale on The Technology Liberation Front
Excellent dissection of the Combs quote! As this debate continues, it is becoming more and more clear how ridiculous the notion of net neutrality really is.

3 years ago

in Neutrality Regulation In the Abstract on The Technology Liberation Front
Thanks for recommending the post - very good piece indeed! It is good that people are waking up and discussing net neutrality. My only concern is that it is being pushed by groups that really have no expertise in the Internet - MoveOn.org? Moby and REM? It would be nice to see some real solutions offered from the industry instead of just sides being taken.

3 years ago

in Daily Neutrino Spin on Broadband Politics
YES! Finally someone getting it right! Great post debunking all the muck that is flying around regarding NN. Let's just hope people will see past Moby and REM and get this one right - the Internet as we know it depends on it!

3 years ago

in Christian Coalition wants some of that ole time Innernet on Broadband Politics
This NN has really twisted my head and I think this may be the funniest posting I have read since the Democrats and MoveOn.org made it such an issue, so THANKS! With CCA joining, now everybody has got be shaking their head, saying, 'huh?' There is something just not right about MoveOn.org and CCA getting in bed on this issue. That alone tells me this issue is not even ready to be discussed!

3 years ago

in The poison pill bill on Broadband Politics
I just don't like how this is being handled. Since when did MoveOn.org, REM and Moby become experts on the Internet? Net Neutrality may POSSIBLY be a good thing, but it needs to be discussed by those who know what they are talking about, not government!

3 years ago

in Wall St. Journal gets it on Broadband Politics
Of course the WSJ gets it - they are all about business and they really know their stuff because they actually research it (wow, big shocker in today's MSM!). Thank goodness we have a widely read publication taking a stand against Net Neutrality. Microsoft and Google are doing a good job of making consumers scared about AT&T and Verizon entering the Internet fray and this piece really puts it into perspective. Let's keep fighting!

3 years ago

in The poison pill bill on Broadband Politics
Well when you have zero competition and lots of money to spend, what do you expect? It is great that Microsoft and Google have been so successful, but clearly they have forgotten where they came from….nothing. The beauty of the Internet is that it is an open source. Open to competition, which leads to innovation and better technology and who would be against that? Only those who have majority control over the Internet!

3 years ago

in Some Thoughts on the New Senate Telecom Reform Draft on The Technology Liberation Front
I've been trying to get my head around this Net Neutrality issue and this is the second great posting from you all that puts it into terms even my grandmother can understand! I'm now set in my belief that government interference in the Internet will slowly destroy the wonderful technology we have at our finger tips! Thanks again!

3 years ago

in Why Communications and Media Markets Will Probably Never Be Deregulated on The Technology Liberation Front
This puts another very good perspective on an issue that sometimes seems to go over my head. Regulation in moderation can be a good thing, but over-regulation and interference where it's not needed are two very different things. I love the fact that the Internet is so open. It takes on new technology and is constantly evolving and innovating and I really don't want to see that change!
Returning? Login