<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Chris Lynn</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/d6a5f8679f2fa845727f98aef5eb07e5/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 11:36:25 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Maker Faire Bay Area 2008 Ticket Giveaway</title><link>http://laughingsquid.disqus.com/maker_faire_bay_area_2008_ticket_giveaway/#comment-1811718</link><description>Whoo whooo!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Lynn</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 12:54:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Beacon Drama Ceases to End</title><link>http://allfacebook.disqus.com/facebook_beacon_drama_ceases_to_end/#comment-1638764</link><description>I think the difference between Beacon and Google Adsense is that Google doesn't have access to all of the data.  I might be wrong, but I think Adsense tracks with cookies and keywords; that's a lot different than sending data from one site to another.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Scoble also makes an outstanding point: Facebook has not responded, apologized or explained themselves, which seems to tell the userbase that FB just doesn't care what they think.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Lynn</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 19:18:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Listens to the Blogosphere</title><link>http://allfacebook.disqus.com/facebook_listens_to_the_blogosphere/#comment-1638780</link><description>First off, it was good that Zuckerberg finally posted.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree: I don't think FB members will Opt-Out of Beacon because most of them don't understand how it works.  For Opt-Out to work, FB has to inform the community of what that actually means and how member data is being used.  Until then, Facebook hasn't really listened, they are still pulling a fast one on their members.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Lynn</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 17:21:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;USA Today News Deck: The Latest News Headlines, Faster&amp;#8221; (and much less usable)</title><link>http://everydayux.disqus.com/8220usa_today_news_deck_the_latest_news_headlines_faster8221_and_much_less_usable/#comment-12698552</link><description>I think it's WAY too text heavy.  Those look like great sidebar bits, but they probably could have achieved the same thing with a more multimedia focus--big pictures or videos under the categories--instead.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Lynn</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 11:23:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2008/02/27/quarterlife-nbc-debut/</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/thread_62062/#comment-5995905</link><description>To me, quarterlife was never a web series.  It was actually a TV series broken down and repurposed for the web.  When approaching web series creation, writers and content creators have to look at the medium of online film as a platform that incorporates all of the social media tools.  Unlike their passive TV watching counterparts, audiences on the web are interactive and want to be immersed in the show.  Don't feed us content, engage us.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Lynn</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 20:50:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2008/04/25/dotcom-bust/</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/thread_19275/#comment-6001740</link><description>Adam, very thoughtful response.  Wondering if CNET was just upset bc they couldn't have a rocking party! \m/</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Lynn</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 04:21:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2008/07/10/how-to-develop-a-social-media-plan/</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/thread_23113/#comment-6010517</link><description>Hi Aaron:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think this is a good primer.  It's definitely important to listen and engage.  There are a couple key steps missing, however.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1) You have to set goals before you can determine your strategy.  Are you trying to increase awareness about your company or product? Trying to decrease calls to your customer service team? Trying to raise the positive sentiment around your brand? These are all different goals that require different strategies.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2) Define who you want to target.  Is it moms? Maybe you want to reach male teen gamers?  In the listening phase, find out where they hang out and what tools they use to communicate.  Since both of these target audiences use social media differently, you'll be able to better choose what tools to use when developing your strategy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;3) Don't just choose to do video or a blog because you feel like everyone else has one.  Choose the tools that best align with your goals and the technologies your target audience use.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;4) Since you have goals, you'll be able to measure how well you met thos egoals.  How many calls to customer service were deferred? Are people talking about your brand in a more positive light? If you have clearly defined goals, the ROI will be a lot easier to see.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Lynn</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 11:06:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: DataCase Turn your iPhone/iTouch into a wireless drive</title><link>http://stumblerz.disqus.com/datacase_turn_your_iphoneitouch_into_a_wireless_drive/#comment-5220407</link><description>Hi Dave! Thanks for sharing the app with your readers.  Hope you enjoy it!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Chris</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Lynn</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:55:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The brand promise of Apple</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/the_brand_promise_of_apple/#comment-9694063</link><description>Ok, so that ad does piss me off.  Ever since I "upgraded" to leopard, my MacBook starts up slower, the fan is in use all the time, things are crashing, and applications run really slowly.  WTF?!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Lynn</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 17:11:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Valleywag is only right 17.3% of the time and why we like it</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/why_valleywag_is_only_right_173_of_the_time_and_why_we_like_it/#comment-9695576</link><description>New Valleywag post:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Scoble Enters Rehab"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Podtech's Robert Scoble is in London allegedly for a conference, but sources close to the former MSFT employee say he has entered rehab for an apparent social media overdose..."</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Lynn</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 14:15:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The idiots laughing beside you</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/the_idiots_laughing_beside_you/#comment-9696153</link><description>I think it's a very interesting idea, but I don't buy it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I will agree that the gestures of those around us supplement a viewing experience, but they are not the entertainment.  I love people-watching, at a mall or plaza, but in a theater, content is king.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Almost like an enhancing drug, real laughter and real expressions of pleasure make the joy that we feel at a comedy show feel even more real. Dr. Cialdini in his book "Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion" calls this social proof; when we feel like others approve or disapprove, we are influenced to comply.  TV studios discovered this years ago and added the laugh track to their shows.  That may be somewhat ok for comedy, but what about news?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The gesture model may be a time-saver, but leaves people open to be influenced by shrewd marketers and politicians.  If everyone is tuning in to the same show, who is discovering content?  What is influencing them? Marketing? Advertising?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What about publishers that don't have the means to market or advertise? Who finds them? How do they get their voice to be heard?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Lynn</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 20:38:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cuil: Why I&amp;#8217;m trying to get off of the PR bandwagon&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/cuil_why_i8217m_trying_to_get_off_of_the_pr_bandwagon8230/#comment-9708331</link><description>I love teaching the little guys how to use social media and prosumer technology to take on the mainstream media.  I love seeing the faces of senior execs at big corporations when they start to understand the idea of conversing and collaborating with your consumers instead of shouting at them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I would love to meet with all the people in the world who have stories to tell in the face of supreme opposition and teach them how to get the word out, like &lt;a href="http://www.aliveinbaghdad.org/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.aliveinbaghdad.org/&lt;/a&gt; or a blogger in China or Africa....</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Lynn</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:02:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Can Blogs Do Journalism?</title><link>http://publishing20.disqus.com/can_blogs_do_journalism/#comment-13572932</link><description>Great post.  It's a good discussion, but I don't think what Gawker is doing is really innovative.  All Things D--published by Dow Jones and edited by Walt Mossberg and Kara Swisher--is one of a handful of sites that incorporate blogging with good, fact-based journalism.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Lynn</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 17:07:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pitching Food Bloggers: My Point of View</title><link>http://tastytouring.disqus.com/pitching_food_bloggers_my_point_of_view/#comment-17223988</link><description>Jodi: &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As a former PR person who now edits a local lifestyle blog, I can say this is great advice that can be applied across the board to most blogs. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Particular &amp;lt;3 goes to this quote: "Understand that this is first and foremost a labor of love. If I covered everything I was pitched, it would no longer reflect who I am and no one would read it."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hopefully PR people take note!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best,&lt;br&gt;Chris</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Lynn</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 11:36:25 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>